By what means does Shakespeare show the ineviteability of Romeo and Juliet ending in tragedy

Authors Avatar

When Shakespeare was alive going to the theatre was a lot different than it is now, You didn’t get fancy seat’s, If you had a bit of money you might have a seat if your lucky but most people would stand up. It was a very social event so it was very noisy, It would have been like going to a modern day concert. Straw would be laid down on the floor because people would throw up and urinate on the floor. There was no curtain and no lights to dim so to let people know that the play was going to start. So Shakespeare had to catch the audiences attention another way.

      In Romeo and Juliet the prologue does this very well. Almost straight away, by the sixth line in fact, everybody knows that both Romeo and Juliet commit suicide. The prologue uses words like blood, fatal and death, which interest people.  It tells the audience about how the two families were old enemies. So it is immediately obvious that it will be difficult for Romeo and Juliet to tell any one about their love for each other. It mentions ‘star-crossed lovers’ which implies that their love is doomed right from the beginning.

Join now!

   Because Romeo and Juliet couldn’t tell people about their love and their marriage the play is full of dramatic irony. All the way through the audience knows something that the actors don’t. (There wouldn’t have been actresses in then). For instance when Tybalt challenges Romeo to a duel, but Romeo won’t fight because Tybalt is his cousin by marriage, the audiences know this but Tybalt doesn’t. Also when lady Capulet is talking to Juliet after Tybalt has been killed, and Romeo has been exiled, Juliet is crying because Romeo was exiled, But her mother thinks that she is grieving ...

This is a preview of the whole essay