• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Canterbury Tales: The Knight and The Squire. Their differences can be seen by their motivations for battle, how they conduct themselves on a daily basis, and how they chose to live their lives.

Extracts from this document...


The Most Interesting and Engaging Title Ever used by Man Geoffrey Chaucer's great unfinished work The Canterbury Tales has enraptured audiences for ages. The public loves to hear the tales told by all of these intricly described characters like the knight and the squire. The Knight and the Squire are an example of two characters in The Canterbury Tales who are at their core, very different people who at first glance seem to be very similar. Their differences can be seen by their motivations for battle, how they conduct themselves on a daily basis, and how they chose to live their lives. If one closely examines the text then they will see that the Knight and the Squire both pursued battle for very different reasons. The knight fights for honor, county and religion, "In fifteen mortal battles he had been / And jousted for our faith at Tramissene / Thrice in the lists, and always killed his man."(line 63-65), he is not trying to show off or boast of his skill but simply defend what he believes in. ...read more.


/ He never yet a boorish thing had said / In all his life to any, come what might; / He was a true, a perfect gentle-knight."(70-74). The squire, on the other hand is the knight's polar opposite, "He was embroidered like a meadow bright / And full of freshest flowers, red and white. / Singing he was, or fluting all the day; / He was as fresh as is the month of May."(91-94) This passage shows how the squire is all about the frill and the fluff and not about any real sort of substance. This is fundamentally different from the knight who is all about modesty and chivalry; he doesn't waste his time chasing after dames, but rather does something meaningful and important with his life. So despite them being father and son, "He [the knight] had his son with him, a fine young Squire," (81) ...read more.


and Chaucer says that "He loved so hotly that till dawn grew pale / He slept as little as a nightingale."(99-100), the squire has chosen a life of lust and personal pleasure, seeking only his satisfaction. While this may be somewhat selfish he does have a pleasant and enjoyable life. While the knight must enjoy what he is doing it seems that the constant fighting would be very tedious and depressing. So it is quite obvious that the knight and the squire are fundamentally different characters as can be seen by looking at their motivations for battle, their day to day lives, and how they have decided to live their lives. If forced to pick one of the two I would have to say that the Knight was correct for moral reasons, but in the grand scheme of things the squire really had a good peaceful life going for himself that I would pick over fighting and nobility any day. The Canterbury Tales. Geoffrey Chaucer. Trans. Nevill Coghill. The British Tradition. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2007. 98-119. Print. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Geoffrey Chaucer essays

  1. Middle ages.

    He was captured and he then returned to England after the treaty in 1360. There is no certain information of his life from 1361 until 1366, when he maybe married Philippa Roet, who was one of Queen Philippa's ladies. Philippa apparently gave him two sons: Lewis and Thomas.

  2. How do the Canterbury Tales explore the idea of gender? Discuss with reference to ...

    Her lewd actions perhaps give an indication to Chaucer's distaste for female aspiration. It seems that the Wife of Bath seeks to extracts as much for her benefit out of marriage, like Nicholas and Alisoun of The Miller's Tale she indulges her sexuality, on a somewhat grander scale; she uses

  1. How do the Canterbury Tales represent female desires?

    The answer unfortunately is yes. St Augustine proclaimed that 'women is a temple built over the sewer'. Thus claiming that although women may seem beautiful and pure, underneath they are as unclean and as filthy as a sewer. This diseased picture of women creates a catch 22 situation for females at the time.

  2. Carnival and Pilgrimage in The Canterbury Tales

    Springtime is represented with the microscopic image of sap flowing in twigs and leaves. We are drawn up close to people's faces; the Prioress, though in a nun's habit, displays a graceful nose, gray eves, a small mouth soft and red, a broad forehead.

  1. The Role of Women in The Canterbury Tales

    This causes the narrator to take an aside from the story to tell us his own opinion on women but says that it is the belief of many men and not his own in an attempt to perhaps cover himself.

  2. General Notes on Chaucer and the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales

    to foryeve it me Al have I nat set folk in her degree Here in this tale, as they shold stonde. My wit is short, ye may wel understonde. Jill Mann, in one of the best studies we have of The General Prologue, Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire; the Literature

  1. What are the differences + similarities between the book and the film? Which is ...

    This causes friction between them until Manolin tells them about Santiago's problems over the last time. When the old man then eventually returns, all the friction is gone and they live happily ever after. The second important difference is that in the film the old man has been given a

  2. The Canterbury Tales is more than a collection of stories, many of them taken ...

    Many texts, especially histories, had been written by monks or other clerics who consequently interpreted events in favor of the Church's, or the ruling class's, perspective. The clergy was notorious for sucking money out of the people any way they could.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work