• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Charles Kingshaw: A Coroner’s report

Extracts from this document...


Charles Kingshaw: A Coroner's report Ladies and gentleman; it is my sad duty to tell you all of the sad events and circumstances that lead to the tragic death of Charles Kingshaw who drowned near the family's home, the isolated, lifeless "Warings". Firstly, I will read what the events leading up to the death were. Edmund Hooper has had a very disturbing and a very abnormal childhood. Since his mother's distressing death when he was 4 years old, he embarked on a sad infancy of neglect and misunderstanding. Young Edmund's personality was mutilated by the awful lack of emotional and physical attention, which resulted from his mother's death. His father was obviously seriously affected also; he threw himself into his work and spared little time for Edmund. Edmund essentially brought himself up emotionally himself, which left him with very serious behaviour deformation. When Mr Hooper met Ms Kingshaw, it seems that he had less time still to spare for his growing child. However, a large addition had been made to the house. Not only did Ms Kingshaw (herself divorced) move into the house as a "temporary housekeeper", a place which, it is of my opinion, was only offered in order to give enough time for Mr Hooper and Ms Kingshaw to make a romantic bond, but also, a new child of Edmund's same age, Charles Kingshaw moved in also. ...read more.


Kingshaw's abnormal upbringing had left him with unusual neurosis and fears. "Warings" is a dark, old house. It is a gothic, dull place situated in an isolated area. There were few children to act as friends to the prisoners in this mansion. There was little to do, except for exploring the local area and entertain them selves about the house. One of Edmund Hooper's many complexes is to play mind-games on others. In this case, the victim was Charles Kingshaw. Hooper started a series of pranks designed to mentally destroy Kingshaw. He was playing a game, trying to break Charles Kingshaw. Such "pranks" included putting a large black crow at the foot of Charles' bed during the night, having previously known that Kingshaw was terrified by crows. Kingshaw awoke, scared and embarrassed. He was trapped in someone else's lair- imprisoned in a labyrinth of manipulation and strategy against him. No one could save him; not even his mother to whom he had previously been closer to but now to whom he felt estranged and disappointed. It was clear where her priorities lay- in Mr Hooper. Charles was fighting a psychological war against Hooper with no emotional support. This left him vulnerable and despairing, often crying himself to sleep. ...read more.


This "childish rivalry" would have ended in death, indubitably. So, who is to blame for this unusual, appalling death? I have described the circumstances surrounding the case. It is of my belief that Kingshaw did kill himself, ladies and gentlemen, finding himself incapable of continuing alone. "No man is an island", it is said- Charles Kingshaw was an island. The constant battering of Hooper followed him everywhere. There was no escape, and there was nowhere to turn. He despaired and killed himself. But who drove him to kill his self? Was it Hooper? Did he consciously mean to drive Kingshaw to suicide or was he so "emotionally disfigured" his self to recognise what exactly he was doing? In which case is it the parents' responsibility, for not having been aware of what was happening between their children, and not having shown genuine love nor attention to their children in such a strange situation after such a difficult childhood? Lest we forget, they themselves had personality issues and mistaken priorities, failed previous relationships; they were both widowed after all, and a lack of affection and emotional confusion must have distorted their acts. However was it their fault that Hooper's personality was "disfigured" at all? It is to you, members of the jury, to decide... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. Can Hooper be seen as anything other than Evil? A comparative Essay on 'I'm ...

    to make Kingshaw feel even worse for something hat he hadn't even done. The next evil thing that Hooper does to Kingshaw is in chapter fourteen when he says that Kingshaw pushed him off the wall at the castle that they all visited on a summer day trip together.

  2. Explain the importance of Warings in the novel?

    Warings and people will be hurt or even killed. There are "cases of grey fish", "stuffed bodies of weasel, stoat, and fox, glass-eyed and posed in stilted attitudes". When Edmund touches the Death's Head Hawk Moth, it 'disintegrated, collapsing into a soft, formless heap of dark dust'.

  1. Who was responsinble for the Death of Kingshaw?

    Hooper then tries to look for the stream while saying, "Right, I can hear it, it's over there.

  2. Compare and contrast the presentation of Charles Kingshaw and Edmund Hooper in I'm the ...

    Edmund is able to spot weaknesses in his victims, and Kingshaw's lack of attention is a weakness. Gregory has had deep love from his mother from before the birth of his half brother. This love from his mother is the reason he is so badly treated by others in his home.

  1. Who or what is to blame for the death of Kingshaw?

    Joseph Hooper was Kingshaw's last salvation, and he was too weak to help Kingshaw when he was in need. Kingshaw is ultimately responsible for his own death as he was the one who killed himself and although he did try to tell his mother what was going on, he could have tried harder.

  2. Compare and contrast the portrayal of parent / child relationshipsin the two novels

    This means that she is not prepared to be in anyway nasty or accusing towards Mr Hoopers son and thinks it is safer to just disbelieve her own son and pretend that it is not happening. Silas Marner, on the other hand, also faces difficulties disiplining Eppie but for different reasons.

  1. Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm ...

    Further more Kingshaw is exhibited to be a victim from Hooper's malevolence when they return from Hangwood. Hooper blames Kingshaw for the wound on his head. 'It was Kingshaw, it was Kingshaw he pushed me in the water' In the previous chapters at Hangwood where the two boys are drawn

  2. woman in black coursework

    It develops that something strange is about to happen, because in her novel every time the 'frets' are up something bad does happens and the Woman In Black appears. Hill sets the area in a happy, bustling town, this makes it seem more catastrophic because you know something bad is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work