Choose any two of Macbeth’s soliloquies and explore them in detail showing-what they reveal about Macbeth’s character, state of mind and motivation.

Authors Avatar
Choose any two of Macbeth's soliloquies and explore them in detail showing-what they reveal about Macbeth's character, state of mind and motivation.

At the beginning of the play Macbeth was recognized as a heroic and kind man, as his wife said, 'full of the milk of human kindness.' Throughout the book we see the gradual development and change of his character, and by the end he is classed as evil and a tyrant, as Macduff says, 'Of horrid hell can come a devil more damned/In evils to top Macbeth.' He is now overcome with greed and bloodthirstiness, which has been rooted into him by the witches' predictions. These predictions maximized his ambition {he would do anything to become king} and changed his usual good and honest motivation into an evil and malicious one. During the transformation of his nature his mind was divided. In the soliloquies, towards the beginning of the book he has an imaginative turn of mind, always thinking of consequences, but after the persuasions by lady macbeth and the witches, this aspect of his mind fades away and he becomes single minded and ruthless. When his wife dies, although he was already a changed man {mostly through her influence} the bitterness he felt maximized his anger and resentment in the mind that was already full of scorpions.

Act 1 Scene7

In one of Macbeths castle's rooms, Macbeth contemplates the killing of Duncan, in a speech that begins, "If it were done, when 'tis done; then 'twere well/ If it were done quickly." The change between 'if,' and 'when,' is Shakespeare's method of indicating Macbeth's uncertainty about the murdering of Duncan. Macbeth's character is trying to convince himself that he is going to commit the crime when, in fact, he is still very unsure, so his first sense of morality is immediately broken.
Join now!


When Macbeth's fears about the consequences of detection surface, Macbeth begins to list the reasons for not assassinating the king.

He turns, first, to personal loyalty. He is deeply disturbed at the prospect of killing a king and a blood relative; 'First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,' and therefore, he notes that he should protect the king against knife, rather than wield it against him.

Secondarily, he perceives that Duncan has been a good king, against whom he has no grievance. This proves his love for the king, especially when he says ...

This is a preview of the whole essay