Comment on Shakespeare's use of violence in Romeo and Juliet.

Authors Avatar

Comment on Shakespeare’s use if violence in Romeo and Juliet

Shakespeare wrote Romeo and Juliet in the Elizabethan times (1596). It was set and played in a town called Verona in Italy. Shakespeare sets the play with two households; firstly the house of Capulet and secondly the house of Montague at which they both have their own private army’s. Both sides hold an “ancient grudge” against one another. “Ancient grudge (from the prologue), gives a sense of violence and that the families despise each other. By this time the audience can already see that there is going to be a fair bit of violence between the two families. Shakespeare also sets our expectations for this play as he tells us how the play ends at the start. The prologue also says “star crossed lovers”. This also lets the audience know that the story is about two lovers which are doomed from the start. Violence is a backdrop of the play because without violence the love between Romeo and Juliet wouldn’t work and therefore wouldn’t effect the audience in the way that it does. It is more exciting because their love is forbidden by their families.

At the beginning of Act 1 Scene 1, Shakespeare starts off with dirty jokes between two Capulet servants in a public place. Words like “my naked weapon is out”, referring to his penis are used. This would make the audience laugh putting them into a good mood. This gives the book a good start which encourages the reader to read further. The audience knows that the scene ends in violence and the reason why the audience know this is because Sampson says to the Montague’s, “I will bite my thumb”, which in Elizabethan times meant that it was disgracing their honour and if they took it and did nothing it meant that they are cowards. Also a fight breaks out in a public place between Sampson, Gregory and Abram, but as a brave peacemaker Benvolio says “part fools” and the stage direction says “beats down their swords”. Benvolio is a Montague and so is Abram, so Abram stops.

Meanwhile Tybalt enters and sees what Benvolio does and he takes this as a chance to mock him by saying “What, art thou drawn among these heartless hinds”. What Tybalt means by this is that Benvolio is fighting with servants, which would have been taken as an insult. Tybalt then challenges Benvolio. Benvolio can not refuse as It would disgrace his honour. The stage direction says “they fight” which at this time would make the audience excited, but the audience doesn’t want anyone specific to win as the audience doesn’t know the characters and their personalities. At this time it was illegal for fighting to take place in a public place and so the watch come and break up the fight. The watch are enforcers of the law but the watch didn’t have as much authority as police these days.

Join now!

The prince then enters. The prince makes three rulings throughout the play. Each ruling is important as it determines how the story progresses. The first ruling was whoever has the next fight “your lives shall pay for the for fit of the peace”. By this he meant that the next person to fight in a public place will pay for it with their lives. The second ruling was that Romeo was to be banished from Verona and the third was that the two families make the peace. The next person to fight is Romeo, but he still lives.

...

This is a preview of the whole essay