• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley and "Flowers For Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, Discuss the themes of alienation and isolation in both novels.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley and "Flowers For Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, Discuss the themes of alienation and isolation in both novels. In 1818 Mary Shelley wrote 'Frankenstein', the story of a man, so consumed by ambition and a thirst for knowledge that in the end his desire to live his dreams, became his death. Almost 150 years later Daniel Keyes wrote 'Flowers For Algernon', this too chronicled one man's ambition and looked at what happens when science and ethics cross. Today, in the year 2002 we are faced with endless dilemmas and questions of integrity- test tube babies, cloning, genetic coding and as time goes on and science improves more and more has to be taken into account, especially as attitudes change. Though these books were written at completely different times and initially seem very different both share similar ideas and both question the consequences when science loses its conscience. 'Frankenstein' was written in a time of great decadence, Shelley was reasonably well off and her works reflects her own, upper middle class status in society. 'Frankenstein' has now become classed as a gothic horror novel, with an air of romance to it. In the grand tradition of all novels in the gothic horror genre, 'Frankenstein' is a tangled tragedy, in which surreal occurrences take place in real situations. The term 'romantic' is placed on this novel, largely because of the time it was written rather than any particular part of the plot. During the 1800s, music art and literature acted as an outlet for the repressed society, through their work people managed to show passion and imagination, rather than order and form, novels of the time were remote from ordinary life. In the example of 'Frankenstein', although Shelley had led a rather colorful life, involving an affair and elopement, society at the time was not very interesting for women, through her work Shelley could take an absence from her own existence and could explore new and obscure ideas. ...read more.

Middle

Both Shelley's and Keyes' work reflects this view and show that when science gains too much power the consequences cannot be foreseen and can end tragically. However, as someone who is interested in psychology, Keyes shows that as humans we are likely to suffer in the present because out subconscious won't let us forget our past. In the long term, we could blame Charlie's suffering on his mother. Rose (Charlie's mother) pushed him hard and over the years managed to erase any sense of self worth Charlie may have had, especially after his sister, Norma was born. These memories and past feelings stay with Charlie and mean that he suffers greatly and it seems fair to say that in the end Charlie's mind causes him the most pain as reminds him of his past. Strauss and Nemur did not create the suffering; they merely created a portal for Charlie to voice his anger and pain through. Throughout the book Charlie is compared to the lab mouse, Algernon, who has also undergone brain surgery to raise his intelligence, he is seen as a 'special' case as he has had a stable level of intelligence for the longest time, unlike the other case studies. When Charlie first started the treatment, one of his tasks was to race Algernon in solving a maze problem, these tests came to an end when Charlie became much more intelligent than the mouse, but Charlie continues to look for similarities he shares with Algernon. Because Algernon had the operation earlier than Charlie, it is possible for Charlie to look at the long term affects of the surgery, but when Algernon starts to deteriorate and become restless, Charlie realises what the future has in store for him. One of the major similarities between Charlie and Algernon is that they both lived before the treatment, but in a way led a half-life, where they were not fully aware of their surroundings and we held back, Charlie by prejudice and Algernon by physical bars of a cage. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although the settings of the novels differ greatly, it is clear that both authors used a similar technique in setting the scene. In Shelley's time the most hostile environment was the countryside it was isolated, much of 'Frankenstein' is set in the great mountains of the North, or in the dramatic and highly dangerous parts of the North Pole. These settings add a sense of drama to the text as well as reflecting the theme of isolation dramatic settings were also typical of romantic, literature, for example Bram Stokers 'Dracula' takes place in the harsh parts of Russia. Keyes takes a modern approach to creating a scene, he chose New York, a famous city, filled with people, he shows that even when surrounded by others it is still possible to feel alienated and face hostility. For Charlie the bustling streets are overwhelming and unwelcoming, to the monster the harsh landscapes mean that he suffers greatly and remains alone. Though the writers differ greatly, and come from completely different times, both seem to share a common interest analyzing people and society as a whole. Both writers looked at the psychology behind science and scientists themselves, both also explore the philosophical questions that science poses. I think that both writers wanted their work to reflect their own views that it is not acceptable for scientists to 'play God' and to intervene with human nature. Both texts also remind the reader about the psychology of our culture and remind us of the social stigma that surrounds both intelligence and appearance. The stories of these men are extremely interesting and raise important issues about science and human nature. Even thought they are written years apart, at completely different stages of scientific development, both writers successfully warn against taking science to far and convey the idea that science without conscience can only end tragically. Kate Rintoul Page 1 of 7 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How does Mary Shelly present the themes of rejection and alienation in the novel ...

    3 star(s)

    Victor also said that the monster was so horrible even Dante could not describe him.

  2. This essay will be an exploration of the causes of Victor Frankenstein's downfall, and ...

    This change is quite ironic as the creature and Victor switch roles. This ironic change also shows Frankenstein how he treated people at this time from this Victor learnt a very important lesson ' Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself '.

  1. How does Mary Shelley present Frankenstein the monster and what do we find out ...

    words to make us feel that this is such a monster that is so horrid that it will turn the heart black with disgust even to look at it. Mary Shelley gives us an early indication that this monster is not going to be such a first-class monster but a

  2. Compare three stories of suspense in three different styles of writing

    When he has to deal with the deaths of Justine, Clerval, Elizabeth and his Father, his emotions go up and down, he hates his creation and he wants to kill himself.

  1. 'Frankenstein Essay' - With reference to chapters 11-16, trace the development and change in ...

    and reassures him that men 'are full of brotherly love and charity.' De Lacey suggests to the monster that he should undecieve the family that he longs to protect. When the monster tells De Lacey that this family live nearby he offers to talk to them and assure them of the monster's good nature.

  2. In your view how do you think Mary Shelley wanted her readers to respond ...

    To him, the cottage it was attached to seemed pleasant yet he dared not enter as he remembered the barbarity of man shown to him previously. The monster seems happy to eat, sleep and learn from where he was. Mary Shelley at this point gives the image of the monster being innocent.

  1. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley - With reference to chapters 11-16, describe the development and ...

    By creating the monster Victor is usurping the role of women, in that he is reproducing and creating life, which one could consider to be a sign that he is scared of his own sexuality. It is also suggestive of the fact that Victor had an Oedipus complex and loved his mother too much.

  2. To what extent is Frankenstein typical of the Gothic genre?

    The monster is also wrongly convicted by the villagers and the De Lacys for being an outsider, and so they have both experienced heavy injustice and prejudice. They share also in their love of nature, although granted, Victor loses his way; he regains it whilst recovering from his 'breakdown'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work