Compare and Contrast how Blake and Wordsworth depict London

Authors Avatar by antlerssylvia (student)

The city of London has inspired many poets throughout the ages: from Chaucer’s Pilgrims to Larkin’s ‘The Whitsun Weddings’. Two of the most distinctive portrayals are William Blake’s London (1794) and William Wordsworth’s Composed upon Westminster Bridge, Sept. 3, 1803. Blake’s poem presents a bleak view of London in the late 18th century, a dismal picture of fallen humanity. By contrast, Wordsworth’s Composed upon Westminster Bridge shows the city of London as beautiful and benign, not in any way threatening or corrupting. This essay explores how these two impressions of London depend on what aspect of London is being examined. Blake wanders around London viewing its inhabitants and describing what he sees and hears; whereas Wordsworth remains static on Westminster Bridge admiring an early morning snapshot view of London while its inhabitants are asleep: an unusual opinion of the city for him.

It is more usual for Wordsworth to reject cities in favour of the countryside and nature. In Lines Written a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey composed in 1798, some five years earlier than Composed upon Westminster Bridge, Wordsworth writes:

                                             …I am still

A lover of the meadows and the woods,

And mountains; and of all that we behold

From this green earth; of all the mighty world

Of eye and ear, both what they half-create,

And what perceive; well pleased to recognize

In nature and the language of my purest thoughts, the nurse,

The guide, the guardian of my heart, and soul

Of all my moral being.   (lines 103-112)

Yet when praising London in Composed upon Westminster Bridge Wordsworth claims ‘[n]e’er saw I, never felt, a calm so deep’ (line 12). He sees the city as peaceful and calm, and this impacts on his own cast of mind. However, Wordsworth is viewing London from Westminster Bridge when the city is sleeping - without the chaos of daily life around him. He is simply admiring a scene – and doing so in unequivocal terms: in this empirical poem (which, unusually for such poems, draws its conclusion at the beginning) he states that ‘Earth has not any thing to shew more fair’ (line 1). This statement implies that his ‘heart, and soul’ are no longer under the guardianship of nature (as in Tintern Abbey). The broad noun ‘Earth’ suggests that this is where he would prefer to be – a poem (to steal a title from Thom Gunn) in praise of cities.

Wordsworth’s view of the city is aesthetic whereas Blake’s is moral. In his poem London Blake does not look primarily at scenery, at buildings or objects. Instead, he portrays the city’s inhabitants in a bleak and dismal way. Blake uses repetition (‘cry’, ‘chartered’, ‘mark’ and ‘every’) and hyperbole to demonstrate his disapproval of the city. He says that he can

Join now!

     mark in every face I meet

Marks of weakness, marks of woe (lines 3-4)

Blake sees and hears ‘weakness’ and ‘woe’ in ‘every face’. He emphasises negative aspects of life in London. He ignores people who may be happy with their lives. By omitting any reference to people who don’t fit his model, Blake can use hyperbole extensively - such as in the repetition and stress of ‘every’:

In every cry of every man

In every Infant’s cry of fear,

In every voice, in every ban

The mind forg’d manacles I hear (lines 5-8)

This repetition ...

This is a preview of the whole essay