• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Keats 'Ode of Autumn' with Heaney's 'Death of a Naturalist' bringing out clearly the poet's attitudes and techniques

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast Keats 'Ode of Autumn' with Heaney's 'Death of a Naturalist' bringing out clearly the poet's attitudes and techniques By Rachel Miller 4H Ode to Autumn by John Keats This ode is a song to Autumn, and is a classic English poem, with that 'old authentic' feel to it. In it Keats manages to create a beautiful picture of what autumn is for him. Unfortunately Keats died from consumption in 1821, and so this was one of his last poems, written in 1819/20, after 'The Fall of Hyperion'. Some people acknowledge this ode as Keats' most perfectly achieved poem, and so this time was Keats' autumn of his life, when he came to produce his best. This typical English poem follows the rules of metre, and characteristically uses Iambic pentameters, as with most good traditional poems. The landscape is also typically English rural countryside, and the side of autumn, which Keats chooses to include, is the custom of the Harvest. Where all the fruits of autumn reach maturity - the farming tradition of autumn. This is a through and through English poem. It was composed soon after a walk in the fields near Winchester (S. England), September 1819. A letter sent to a friend (J.H Reynolds) shows just how much of the poem was written from experience. In the letter Keats makes reference to Diana, goddess of the moon and of chastity, but she is not apparent in the poem, except the hints of godliness perfection. Keats was fond of classical myth and legend and another goddess who seems to appear is Ceres, goddess of Harvest. She is most likely the figure 'sitting carelessly on a granary floor,/Thy hair soft-lifted by the winnowing wind;' The first stanza introduces autumn as close friend of the sun, personifying autumn, collaborating with it in order to bring about the maturing of the fruit and nuts 'Close bosom friend of the maturing sun; Conspiring with him how to load and bless With fruit the vines . ...read more.


You could tell the weather by frogs too For they were yellow in the sun and brown In rain.' Some of it is useful, but most it useless, but nonetheless classic child information, which accentuates just how much of a protected world he lives in. In stanza two it is possible to tell right away that something is about to happen by the first line, 'Then one hot day', which changes the atmosphere of the poem to one of expectation. The first words to signify an attack are 'the angry frogs / Invaded the flax-dam'. He thinks that the frogs are angry because he has stolen their eggs and so interprets the frog's actions of that of a hostile attack. So the imagery described by the child supports the feeling that an attack is imminent - 'coarse croaking that I had not heard / Before', 'gross-bellied frogs were cocked', 'their loose necks pulsed like sails' and 'Poised like mud grenades'. However the reader should know that it is an innocent situation, that frogs return to the same water every year. The child feels sickened by the images and so comes the shortest sentence 'I sickened, turned, and ran.' The child experiences new feelings, in contrast to the first stanza where the flax-dam was a comfort it now fills the child with terror at this side of nature. Then the child flees from the nightmarish visions he has conjured up: ' . . . The great slime kings Were gathered there for vengeance and I knew That if I dipped my hand the spawn would clutch it.' The child has to deal with these new emotions, the most immediate one being fear, and finds the urge to run. It is a new world for him, unknown, and he is no longer protected from it. In this poem Heaney has four different angles at which the poem is put together: adult Heaney as a realist, nature's lessons, his childhood perspective and stripping everything to down to basics. ...read more.


He is looking for answers because we only ever see part of the story (like in the poem, we only ever see the story from the child's point of view), because we don't know everything. We have to grow and learn from our experiences, and this is Heaney's experience, and there is a change in the child from being a child emotionally and being protected from things like that, and being an adult, as he grows and learns. Heaney allows us to feel and see the full force of nature, the horror, and see that we cannot control it, but that the decay can. The decay equals the change in nature, and is a metaphor for the change in the child. We are part of nature and while we are not controlled by the change caused by decay what we see and feel and thus learn from changes us. Keats' nature is a divine force, nothing, not even decay can change it for Keats. The power of this poem is supposed to bring alive for us autumn as Keats sees it. That's what Romanticism is about, turning something that an ordinary person would see as perhaps disgusting, into something beautiful and wonderful. For Keats art cures everything, it didn't matter that he was dying of tuberculosis but it did matter that he wrote this poem. I think Heaney is trying to show that maybe we are taught to see things by society, and nature is the untamed truth e.g. the child is taught at school about the frogspawn but not how it is made, not mentioning the sexual reproduction involved. Nature is a better teacher than man, it teaches about that, it teaches about recycling in the decay. It is not enough for Heaney to just watch nature like Keats does. He must be involved in nature. He gets his wellington boots out and gets stuck in. This most likely comes from having lived on a farm, and having all the experiences he did. Keats' poem came from his ultimately dreamy heart, forever impractical on looking at things as they are. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE John Keats section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE John Keats essays

  1. Compare and contrast William Wordsworth and John Keats' attitude towards nature in the poems ...

    This happens as Keats describes when the senses are disrupted sometimes by drugs and the mind then floats upwards out of the body, afterwards when the mind returns to the body, the person recalls the experience not as a dream but as a vivid and wide awake experience.

  2. Analysis of Keats' 'Ode To Autumn'Arguably Keats' greatest ode is 'To Autumn'. The poem ...

    they don't matter anyway, and nor perhaps does the end which is the timescale that this third stanza encompasses. Keats uses images of death when he describes how the gnats "mourn", and illustrates the idea of there being no control over death, as he talks of the "wind" deciding whether something "lives or dies".

  1. Analyse the different attitudes the poets John Keats and P.B. Shelley have towards nature ...

    Shelley is fascinated with the west wind because for Shelley, the west wind is a tool for spreading his ideas and thoughts. In his poem 'To A Skylark,' Shelley talks about recluse and freedom. Due to his own free life, Shelley finds peace and comfort in independence.

  2. Compare and contrast Keats' presentation of time, transience and mortality in "Ode to Autumn" ...

    lands forlorn" also this depicts emptiness as he realises that it will not be such a happy escape after all. In "Ode to Autumn" Keats can detect no clear change in his feelings of life. He appears to have a found a realistic balance between ecstasy and emptiness.

  1. analysis of "when we two parted" by John Keats

    the word "shudder" implies "cold", the poet uses the sensation of cold to convey the feelings of grief once more. This agonized question asked by the poet himself tells us that the lady is no dearer to him. He shudders at the thought of how dear she was.

  2. Compare and analyse the poems of Keats (“Ode to Autumn”, “Ode to a Nightingale”) ...

    The metaphor of a single person in a boat in the middle of a huge lake represents one person in isolation from society. The mountain that towers over the person in the boat represents the raw power of nature, so much more powerful than a mere human (a Romantic ideal

  1. Comparing Wordsworth and Keats' Romantic Poetry.

    Keats instead personifies many more diparate things about autumn, like the sun, "friend of the maturing sun". Autumn bears fruits because of the maturing sun, so he personificates them toghether in the first two lines of the poem. Wordsworth uses allitenation at the end of his poem "Daffodils" to empasise

  2. In what ways is 'to Autumn' alike and unlike 'Ode to a nightingale' and ...

    is using death images on nature, whilst also creating an idea of the flower drooping its head in sadness. 'To Autumn' on the other hand is filled with positive imagery and ideas such as, 'fruitfullness' and 'ripeness'. This gives the idea of fertility and birth, which are considered beautiful images

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work