• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast 'Of Mice And Men' and 'The Pearl' looking especially at how Steinbeck has interwoven the social and political concerns of that time.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast 'Of Mice And Men' and 'The Pearl' looking especially at how Steinbeck has interwoven the social and political concerns of that time. The story 'Of Mice And Men' is quite similar to the story of 'The Pearl'. Both stories deal with the social and political issues of that time. The stories deal with the issues of sexism, racism, greed, loneliness, hardship but also with friendship and ambitions. John Steinbeck was born in 1902, Salinas Valley, California. In 1929, aged 27, he completed his first novel 'Cup Of Gold'. He did work as a labourer and journalist for five years. After writing his first novel, he moved back to California where he wrote many more novels and short stories. Steinbeck often wrote about what he understood or what issues he felt were important to him. For example, he wrote many novels about the labouring people, he wrote 'Bombs Away: The Story Of A Bomber Team', he wrote about his travels and even a saga about his family history. He even studied marine biology so that he could write the 'Sea Of Cortez'. He won the Nobel Prize in 1962. John Steinbeck died at the age of 66, in 1968. This essay will discuss the various themes of the two novels written by John Steinbeck. These themes include the hardship and suffering endured by the characters of both of the novels, racism, sexism, greed, dreams, loneliness and friendship. ...read more.

Middle

There is a description of Kino and Juana, in the story that the beggars in the city had made. They saw Juana's old skirt, 'the tears in her shawl', the beggars even saw through the age of Kino's blanket and they saw the amount of times his clothes had been washed was a lot and so the beggars, who were 'great experts in financial analysis' came to the conclusion that Kino and Juana were 'poverty people'. In the beginning of the story, the family seem to be happy and comfortable. Steinbeck describes their mourning routine s though Kino and Juana didn't mind being poor, but we learn that isn't true. When Coyotito is stung by the scorpion, Juana and Kino feel helpless as they cannot afford to treat their son. To make the situation worse, Coyotito is their first born son, and so it is very important that they are able to provide adequate medical treatment for him. When Juana has to make do with the seaweed poultice, we learn that the traditional methods of treating a scorpion bite were frowned upon by Juana, as the remedy lacked the doctors 'authority' just because it was simple and it didn't cost a penny. Not only that but they couldn't afford to get married even. Lennie and George were very poor too. On average they got 50 dollars a month, but they got accommodation and food. The migrant ranch workers, tended to live in filth conditions and many had body lice. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lennie was just like a child, and children cannot have adult conversations. This is far better than the others on the ranch. Crooks isn't allowed to make friends with others because he isn't anything more than just a 'nigger' to them. Candy too, is discriminated against because of his disability and his old age. The shooting of Candy's dog was a fine example of how if something isn't of any use any more - then just kill it. I think Steinbeck tried to get his readers to be more aware and understanding towards the underprivileged. Steinbeck understood these people, so he wrote about them. There is a hidden moral here to be learnt, that I feel Steinbeck was trying to give across. I believe Steinbeck was saying that in those times and even now, money doesn't always equal to prosperity. Take for example, the doctor, he was a wealthy man in 'The Pearl', but he wasn't actually happy and content. Kino and Juana were by far better off than the doctor, as they had love, not money, even though money can seem to solve problems. As for George and Lennie, they seemed to be happy enough in their dreams and ambitions, far happier than Curley, who had inherited his father's wealth. Curley could have even been jealous of the ranch men and their freedom. Steinbeck showed that none of his characters, in either book, were fully content with their situation. This could be saying something about the nature of humans, how the grass is always greener on the other side, and how nobody is going to fully happy with wealth. SHIVANI PATEL ENGLISH ESSAY ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE John Steinbeck section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE John Steinbeck essays

  1. How Does Steinbeck Use The Character Of Crooks To Highlight Certain Issues Which Were ...

    is that of an animal, they class him as dirt, lower then the horses. His bed is just a box on hay and blankets as well, which is also Steinbeck creating an image of a man treated like an animal.

  2. Written Commentary - The Pearl

    The servant refused to speak in the old language, showing how much discrimination there is towards Kino's people. The sentence 'The glaring sun threw the bunched shadows of the people blackly on the white wall' gives us a mental image of black people and white people being contrasted and compared

  1. What issues was John Steinbeck trying to make us think about in "Of Mice ...

    Strong and powerful but lacking any real intellect. Lennie also has a dream in which he lives by himself in a cave. Maybe this would be the only way the natural world of Lennie would not come into conflict with the unnatural world of man. The human nature of the ranch workers is one of violence, loneliness and bitterness.

  2. A breakdown of Steinbeck's 'Of mice and Men'.

    From the outset, Lennie unwittingly incurs Curley's antagonism simply because of his size, and the reader immediately braces for future confrontation. Curley remains undeveloped, forever little and forever mean, poking his head in at various points in the novel, either to look for his wife or to stir up trouble on account of her.

  1. What does the novel 'Of mice and men' tell you about the way of ...

    Another example of Depression and unhappiness is when Candy's dog gets shot. "Got no teeth," Carlson said. "He's all stiff with rheumatism. He ain't no good to you, Candy. An' he ain't no good to himself. Why'n't you shoot him Candy?"

  2. Why I think Candy was added by John Steinbeck to his book

    An' never a god damm one of 'em ever gets it' But after a while he believes that they might actually get their ranch and decides he also wants in. His hopes are soon crushed by Curlys wife's taunts and changes his mind; 'Well, jus' forget it,' said Crooks.

  1. Of Mice and Men

    She becomes angered by Lennie's continual references to rabbits, and asks him what his attraction to them is. Lennie explains that he likes to touch and pet soft things, like rabbit fur. Curley's wife allows Lennie to stroke her hair, but panics when he won't let go.

  2. Comparing Of Mice and Men & The Pearl.

    Company 3.9.29 13.10.29 American Car $182 $86 General Electric $396 $168 Radio $505 $28 People heard that California had good soil and also had plenty of room and so headed West, where "Of Mice & Men" is set. The Pearl was written in 1944 and was published in 1945.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work