Compare and contrast the poems upon Westminster bridge, by William Wordsworth and London by William Blake. Explain which one is more effective and why

Authors Avatar

Compare and contrast the poems ‘upon Westminster bridge’, by William Wordsworth and ‘London’ by William Blake. Explain which one is more effective and why

The first poem ‘upon Westminster bridge’ by William Wordsworth is about his love of London as he looks out from Westminster bridge in the early morning.

        The poem is written in the form of a sonnet, which is appropriate given the poems main theme of his love for London. He has cleverly structured the poem to follow the pattern of iambic pentameter which puts stress on certain words to provide emphasis for instance in the first line “fair” is stressed to show how beautiful he considers London to be. The rhyming pattern changes throughout the poem with it starting as ABBA but then changing to an alternative rhyme scheme (ABAB) at the start of the sestet.

        The atmosphere and mood created by Wordsworth is that of awe and splendour. This mood shown by lines such as “a sight so touching in its majesty” emphasises the poems meaning of his love for the city. Calmness and tranquillity are also present throughout the poem, for example “the beauty of the morning silent, bare”.

The title itself tells us that the London Wordsworth is writing about is just what he can view from looking out from Westminster Bridge. This setting explains why the poem describes London as beautiful and awe inspiring. If Wordsworth had written the poem from another perspective, for example a rancid back alley, it is likely he would have been much less complementary. The title tells us the date when the poem is written (1802).

In the first line Wordsworth makes the statement “Earth has not anything to show more fair”. His use of hyperbole makes this line powerful and a good introduction on which he can elaborate throughout the poem. His use of iambic pentameter allows him to put emphasis on “fair” to show how beautiful he considers London.
        In the next line “dull would he be of soul” Wordsworth challenges that anyone who might not share his perception of London as being uncreative and having little or no imagination. This may have been a personal attack at fellow poet William Blake who harboured a clear distaste for the city.

        The following line “a sight so touching in its majesty” follows on from the previous line as enjambment. To emphasise the end of the point Wordsworth has said “ a sight so touching “ to create an emotive impact. His use of the royal connotation “majesty” provides further emphasis by showing importance as well as the added significance that London is where the royal family reside.

The next line “this City now doth like a garment wear” personifies London to make it seem alive it also provides a feminine description to contrast with the masculine descriptions in the following lines for example when the river Thames is described “glideth of his own sweet will”. Wordsworth spells city with a capital to purposely point out that London is the capital city.

        In the next line Wordsworth subtly builds upon the personification shown in the previous line with “the beauty of the morning: silent, bare” suggesting that the city is alive but not yet awoken. It could also be that he’s furthering his feminine description by suggesting that the city is like a beautiful woman sleeping. The use of punctuation with “morning: silent, bare” leads to a staccato deliverance making each of the words emphatic. Again a clear bias in Wordsworth’s writing is shown simply by the use of the word “morning” as it shows that hardly any people would be hardly any people about and an accurate description of the grimmer side of London could not be made.

Join now!

        The following line “ships, towers, domes, theatres, and temples lie” alludes to various London landmarks. For example “towers” could be referring to the houses of parliament or the tower of London, “domes” a direct reference to St Pauls cathedral and “theatres” meaning Shakespeare’s ‘globe’ while the identity of the “ships” and “temples” remains anonymous.

        The next line “Open unto the fields, and to the sky” is written to suggest instead of factories and warehouses of the industrial revolution encompassing the city and blotting its sky with smog London nestles between idyllic countryside with clear sky’s.

          The following line ...

This is a preview of the whole essay