• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the speeches made by Brutus and Antony over the body of Caesar.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the speeches made by Brutus and Antony over the body of Caesar. Explain the ways in which Shakespeare exploits language for dramatic effect exploring the reactions of the crowd on stage and of the spectator watching theplay. "Liberty! Freedom! Tyranny is dead!" So claims Cinna as Caesar is fallen. Brutus his trusty friend killed for Rome while Cassius his jealous counterpart killed over hate. The conspirators brought his body to the market place to show the people. Over the corpse, two speeches were made. In this essay I will compare and contrast these two speeches. Both of the speeches have similar have similar beginnings. Brutus starts off with "Romans, countrymen and lovers!" He starts with "Romans", because in his eyes he feels his country is more important then his lovers, Caesar. He realises how much the crowd feel pride in their country, so manipulates their weak spot, in the hope that they will see his point of reason. This type of language is formal and elaborate, and he speaks as though he is talking to the senate. Antony, however, begins with "Friends, Romans, countrymen" By calling the crowd his friends, he is considering himself as though he is on their level, rather than elevating himself like Brutus. Through this, familiar and direct language, the crowd feels closer to Antony, because they realise that it is like speaking to their friend, rather than speaking to the senate, the way Brutus makes it. ...read more.


On the other hand, Antony's speech is constantly progressing, because he states the clear facts, as they appear to stand and elevates Caesar by mentioning his numerous achievements for example swelling the coffers of Rome, and looking after the poor. This type of style is the one used to speak to the senate, not to the common rank and file people, not to the common rank and file people, and for this reason he is not as effective as Antony, who is placatory and soothing. Antony's oratory is subtle, and gets straight to the point. These little differences all influence the crowd, and consequently they are all whipped up into an outrage once he has finished speaking. Another important element to be taken into consideration about Antony's speech, is that he manages to slowly but surely influence the crowd without his opinions being necessarily right, and all this is the consequence of his understanding of what make the crowd tick, the crowd psychology. Both speakers bring facts into their speeches, but in different ways. Brutus is very presumptuous when he says that if Caesar would've been allowed to live, he would have enslaved them all, and often claiming that Caesar was very ambitious. Antony uses facts in a clever way. He emphasises the facts, for example Caesar not appearing to be ambitious, and through this, he makes Brutus look a fool by making it seem obvious that Caesar had no ambition. ...read more.


Antony's use of questions is to strengthen the fact that Caesar had no ambition at all. He repeats "Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?" so many times that we are convinced Caesar had no ambition. The questions he asks are the ones that are possible to be answered by the crowd, and although this may seem a bit hazardous, he is still controlling the thoughts of the crowd, and convincing them to agree with him. Throughout his speech Antony appears overwhelmed with emotion, and he does this to make sure that the conspirators did not get away with this murder, but we know, he wasn't just upset, but very angry, so much so that when he was alone on the stage he said that "Mothers shall but smile when they behold Their infants quarter'd with the hands of war" And also "Let slip the dogs of war" so we see that he wanted there to be a civil war, because of his extreme anger over Caesar's death. The crucial distinction between the two speeches, are that Antony has a clear understanding of the crowd psychology, and persuade the crowd to see his notion very easily because of this. Brutus does not understand what makes the crowd tick, and this characteristic is clearly the most important feature of making Antony's speech so effective, and Brutus' an unconvincing, ineffective, dire address. 1739 Words ?? ?? ?? ?? Alex Haffner Coursework - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. The speeches of Brutus and Anthony over the body of Caesar.

    choice and so they are more likely to stick with Anthony than Brutus, who forced them to agree. Both Brutus and Anthony speak of Caesar's honour and how much they loved him. However in Brutus's speech he then speaks of Caesar's ambition.

  2. Compare and contrast the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus. Which is the most ...

    He would not take the crown; therefore 'tis certain he was not ambitious." This has undermined Brutus' whole speech. Brutus' whole speech and reasons were based upon the fact that Caesar was too ambitious, but here Antony has apparently proved that he was not in fact ambitious, and so has proved that Brutus killed Caesar for no good reason.

  1. Compare and contrast the speeches made by Brutus and Antony over the body of ...

    The crowd listened too Brutus talk about how much he loved Rome and why he had killed Caesar because he was ambitious, but didn't ask him to elaborate on how exactly was Caesar ambitious and so on. The crowd has no intellectual ability as we see from before that they

  2. If Caesar had lived, would he have become a tyrant?

    Wilt thou lift up Olympus?' This means, 'Go away! If you will kill me, will you kill a God?' this is ironic, and infuriating once more likening himself to a God. Caesar then tells Metellus that he is kneeling in vain and that he might as well give up.

  1. Comparison of the Speeches made by Brutus and Antony in the Marketplace

    Both characters use different tactics to convince the Plebeians that they should support their views. For example, during Brutus' speech, Brutus says that he killed Caesar because he loved Rome more than Caesar (not that he did not love Caesar at all)

  2. Julius Caesar Essay

    did he really deserve to be butchered? Throughout the speech, he makes himself subtly clear about what he think; that Caesar was wrongfully slain, without Brutus or the other conspirators being able to blame him for saying anything he shouldn't. He also covers himself against Brutus: "I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke."

  1. Brutus and Antony's speeches.

    is also here giving a bit of an explanation to why Caesar would end up being bad for Rome he says there is death for his ambition, he is saying that he was over ambitious. He is trying to get sympathy from the crowd and trying to give an explanation to the crowd.

  2. Compare and contrast the speeches made by Brutus and Anthony over the body of ...

    The spectators in the audience will be able to see this and conclude that Anthony understands the crowd better. In just the first few words of each speech we can see Shakespeare's excellent deployment of language.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work