• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the two interpretations of Act 3, Scene 1 of 'Romeo and Juliet'

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the two interpretations of Act 3, Scene 1 of 'Romeo and Juliet' Romeo and Juliet is a tragic love story, which plays with its audiences emotions throughout the play. This dramatic play by William Shakespeare is about two young people from different families. Romeo is a Montague and Juliet a Capulet. They live their romance secretly so the feud between the families would not get out of hand. Due to the tension, the lovers take their own lives and the families are left heartbroken. Act 3, Scene 1 is so important in the play because until the key events of the scene unfold, the play is portrayed as a romantic love story, but as the scene draws to an end, the atmosphere is a lot darker and it actually develops into a tragedy. At the start of Act 3, Scene 1, Benvolio desperately tries to avoid an argument with the Capulets. Benvolio's eagerness to flee is shown in the line, 'I pray thee, good Mercutio, let's retire.' He makes a big effort to persuade Mercutio to go home as the heat will make them very agitated and there will be will a shorter tolerance of each other if they meet the Capulets. Benvolio's explanation of this is shown in the line, 'For now these hot days is the mad blood stirring.' Benvolio believes they would have no chance against the Capulets, as shown in the line, 'And if we meet we shall not 'scape a brawl.' In the opening few lines the atmosphere is tense and gives the audience a sense of excitement as they don't know whether the Capulets are going to turn up or if Mercutio and Benvolio will leave to avoid an argument. ...read more.


Contrastingly in the new version, Romeo totally backed down and did not defend himself, and this led to Mercutio having to risk his own life to protect Romeo. Tybalt and Mercutio did not use any weapons, apart from themselves and the fight stayed in the same place. A tense moment was when Tybalt landed in some glass and shattered it, and picked up a piece and went for Mercutio deliberately, unlike in the old version where the injuring of Mercutio was an accident. Mercutio was to blame for the fight happening in the older version compared to the newer version where Tybalt started it. I found the newer version more successful as it was more unpredictable and weapon was more imaginative, but I liked the way Zeffirelli made the fight travel and have levels. Mercutio doesn't realise how deep his injury is and jokes about how it is only minor, but it's enough and therefore they will find him dead tomorrow. This is shown in the line, 'No, 'tis not so deep as a well, nor so wide as a church door, but 'tis enough, 'twill serve. Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man.' In the newer version he puts on a brave face until he lifts his shirt to show the wound, his face displays an expression of terror and fear. The camera does a close-up on the wound and then onto Mercutios face. This makes the wound look devastatingly painful and therefore makes the audience feel a sense of dread, fear and sympathy for Mercutio. The wind then picks up which adds tension and drama. In the older version, Mercutio is laughed at by the crowd. He doesn't look at the wound as in the newer version, but covers it with a handkerchief. ...read more.


This was because there were no courts to take your case to four hundred years ago. The best way to take revenge on a criminal was to challenge them to a duel. An Elizabethan audience wouldn't react as bad to the extent as a 21st Century would. I think this because of the revenge code and that they would expect people to take revenge and that it might lead to a death. I feel the technology of the time and the period each film was made in would make a big difference in the way it would affect an audience. In the new film, better technology and skills were available and its modernisation let it relate to the audience of today. For example its setting, changing it from a square to a beach and using guns instead of swords. The sound effects were a strength as it adds to creating an atmosphere, and the way the weather could change very quickly when something bad happened. Luhrmann also showed the loyalty between the family members without saying it in a speech. He uses the family crest on the butt of their guns. I feel the old version didn't show this loyalty. An Elizabethan audience would prefer the first film because it's more to their era, just like the new version is more to mine. The added sound and light affects added to the new films effectiveness and the way it successfully played with its audience's emotions and feelings. I prefer the newer version as its more updated and the effects are far better than the old film, even though it showed more tradition. Both films have their own strengths, but my favourite comes down to the era it was filmed in and the way I can relate to it. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet.

    be his own interpretation of 'Romeo and Juliet' if he just used everything Shakespeare did. By limiting the amount of language he took from Shakespeare's version makes it interesting to hear, when you do realise a character is speaking it.

  2. In Luhrmann's version of Romeo and Juliet, the commencement of the Capulet Ball is ...

    In contrast, Shakespeare would have portrayed this scene in his theatre with two or three actors dancing on stage and wearing masks. There would have been no ornate costumes and no special lighting effects. And there would have been no music in the Globe Theatre, so people had to use their imagination to interpret the scene to its best effect.

  1. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    They see each other through a fish tank. The scene is a lot more 'flirty' and believable compared to the Franco Zeffirelli production, which I think, is quite important as it symbolises the emotional side of their relationship. In the Franco Zeffirelli production when Romeo and Juliet are dancing together they spin around and the background becomes more

  2. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    I have come to the conclusion that Romeo and Juliet is more to do with love than hate because of the style of language used and the way the characters express how they feel about one another. The story contains mostly references to love and therefore would conclude that the story was written about love.

  1. Baz Luhrmann's 'Romeo and Juliet': Cinematography

    As well as the choice of costumes to establish relationships, Luhrmann also uses the dancing. Paris dances awfully, and during that there is a private joke between Romeo and Juliet, though Paris interprets that as Juliet enjoying dancing with him.

  2. Analysis of a scene from Luhrmann's production of Romeo and Juliet: Act 3, Scene ...

    It also seems unfair that the Capulets are more advanced and prepared to fight with their bullet-proof vests, as the Montagues are at a disadvantage during any shootouts that may occur. This creates sympathy for the Montagues, which later means that the audience has sympathy for Romeo when he shoots Tybalt and is banished.

  1. Analysis of Baz Luhrmann's romeo and juliet

    A high angle shot gives a character a more timid look that makes them look small and less intimidating an example of this is when a Capulet boy retreats back into his seat after Abra showing his mouth brace with the word 'sin' on it.

  2. Compare and contrast Romeo's conversation with Mercutio (Act1.4) with his soliloquy before Juliet appears ...

    Here, Romeo is talking about the sexual side of love and Mercutio carries this on by making a pun on the word 'prick'. He says, "Prick love for prickling, and you beat love down." In Mercutio's view, love-sickness is caused by lack of sex; if he would stimulate his love

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work