Compare and contrast the two poems ‘Slough’ and ‘No More Hiroshimas’

Authors Avatar

        Adam Bostock

Compare and contrast the two poems ‘Slough’ and ‘No More Hiroshimas’

In this essay, I will aim to compare and contrast the two poems Slough by John Betjeman and No More Hiroshimas by James Kirkup.

In the poem Slough, the poet urges bombers to destroy Slough.  He feels the town has no value – ‘mess up the mess they call a town’ and that men who profit from cramped housing conditions deserve to be punished.  The poet thinks that not everyone is to blame – ‘spare the bald young clerks’ – but has the opinion that having eaten too much artificial food, the humans in this town have become artificial themselves.  In the final verse, the poet states the earth would be put to better use planting cabbages.

The poem No More Hiroshimas is similar to Slough in that it is about bombs, but here the atom bomb has already fallen.  The poet appears to be a visitor to Hiroshima- ‘At the station exit, my bundle in hand’.  At first the poet is amazed to find that Hiroshima has become a major tourist attraction, but is consoled by visiting the Park of Peace and the Peace Tower at the Atomic Bomb Explosion Centre to find that the dead have not been forgotten.

Join now!

Throughout the poem Slough, there is a tone of cynical humour.  The poet has strong feelings about housing conditions, but doesn’t really want Slough to be bombed – ‘come friendly bombs’.  Perhaps the poet is using ‘friendly bombs’ as a metaphor, for government officials who might come and sort out the housing problems.  At times the poet adopts a superior tone – ‘spare the bald young clerks’, ‘it’s not their fault, they do not know’.  In the first and final verses, the poet adopts an environmentalist tone that might mean he feels the cramped housing is suffocating the earth beneath ...

This is a preview of the whole essay