• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Compare and contrast the way Curley's wife is portrayed in the novel and the film adaptation of "Of Mice and Men".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Media Coursework The purpose of this essay is to "Compare and contrast the way Curley's wife is portrayed in the novel and the film adaptation of "Of Mice and Men". The novel, written by John Steinbeck was compiled during the period of the Great Depression. It was first published in the year of 1937. The film was released in 1992 and was directed by Gary Sinise. The screenplay was written by Horton Foote. Gary Sinise also played the character of George and John Malkovich took on the role of Lennie. Throughout the film adaptation of the novel, there are many differences in the portrayal of the character of Curley's wife. A possible reason for this could be that the film was made just under 50 years before the novel was published. In the novel and film there are a few minor things which do not seem to important which, in effect are differences in which the Director of the film has portrayed the character of Curley's wife to be, such differences are: In the film, she is not wearing a red "house dress" as described in the novel, because this red dress would make her look rather flirtatious and the red "mules" (shoes) which would have made her look like she really was a tart, are also missing. In the film, she is only wearing a white dress with flowers printed on it, and she is also carrying a coke bottle when she is first introduced into the film, this is because the Director has chosen to make her look more innocent and childish. ...read more.

Middle

"He aint a nice fella" and says this in confidence to Lennie as she has no one to really trust and rely on. The filmmakers are trying to show her as having rushed into marriage as she says: I coulda made somethin' of myself" and believes she still can. She is referring back to how she was going to be an actress in the novel and the film, however, in the film, her voice and posture show that she is a young girl that has missed out on an opportunity and wants to do something with her life, but believes that she has made the wrong decision by going into marriage and does not want to change anything now, because she is too scared and is regretful of the past, for example, not being able to be in the movies. She says she met a guy who"...says he was gonna put me in the movies" and then says that she "...never got that letter" so she married Curley, whom she also met "...out the riverside palace that same night." I personally think that the Director chose to present Curley's wife as a young ambitious girl, trapped in a life where nobody wants to talk to her, because they seem to misunderstand her, and I think they have done this to make her seem more sympathetic and to respect the equal rights of women and not to be sexist or prejudice in any way. ...read more.

Conclusion

hand to show she could act, but while doing this, also gives off the sense that she is being flirtatious by being so openly friendly with someone she hardly knows. It is clear after having watched the film and read the novel that the filmmakers clearly had different intentions of the way they were going to represent the character of Curley's wife and this could be due to the fact that the Director wanted to show Curley's wife's character as a typical young woman of the time. This could be due to the fact that a lonesome woman with no one to talk to in the time of the novel being published would perhaps become a "tart" as suggested in the book by Candy and be overfriendly and playfully teasing. It could also be that the views of a single married woman, with a husband who does not care about her, being surrounded by constant male company are a lot different to woman in similar circumstances today. Today, a woman that is in constant male company would rarely be referred to as a "tart" or even "jail bait" as Candy describes her. Times have changed and so have people's views and opinions about certain issues, such as the social status of woman within a community and woman in general are thought of a lot differently by average working class men and groups such as the Suffragettes have changed things that we often overlook today. Sunny Gill 11B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE John Steinbeck section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE John Steinbeck essays

  1. Dear Diary.

    Didn't mean no harm. I threatened him with the thought of his pal, George Milton, who Lennie seemed to be fond of, leaving him behind. Of course, all that's unlikely to ever happen, but I dunno... It got his attention though.

  2. A comparison of John Steinbeck's novel 'Of Mice and Men' and the 1939 film ...

    This is powerfully described in the novel as "Lennie watched in terror". Lennie's body language is that of a frightened man and is emphasised by a close-up shot of his face, focusing on the fear in his eyes, also giving the impression that he is innocent even though he has just injured Curley.

  1. A constant dreamer

    It had, as is plain, something of nightmare about it, since it always ended in the same appalling terror, which so far from getting less, seemed to me to gather fresh fear every time that I experienced it.

  2. In this assignment I will explain why the main characters in Willy Russell's "Blood ...

    No, sir, we'd have our own place where we belonged and not sleep in no bunk house" (63). 3) The Boss, on George and Lennie: "Well, I never seen one guy take so much trouble for another guy. I just like to know what your interest is" (25).

  1. How would you use film language to make the final scene of 'Of Mice ...

    We opted for dynamic sounds to reflect and re-enforce the general mood/atmosphere. Very soft ambient sounds of hay and horses rattling the halter chains reveals the active, vibrant atmosphere of the ranch is no more. Horse running and feet pattering meant nobody waits and no time is going to be extended for either George or Lennie's fate.

  2. Curley's wife is a tart. Discuss.

    It is understandable that some of the men may see Curley's wife in this way because she uses excuses to be with them alone for example, when she is looking for Curley. Candy refers to her as a tart. He calls her a "god-damn tramp," and a "lousy tart."

  1. Having Read Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck the section of the book ...

    The camera deliberately looks down on Curley's wife and looks up at the big imposing figure of Lennie. The camera does this to Curley's wife as she (in the film) is designed to be a very innocent and angelic character.

  2. Compare Steinbeck's novel with the1992 film version of 'Of Mice and Men'. In your ...

    The Sycamore's horizontal limb has been worn away from people sitting on it so much. This has been told to the reader because it shows that this place has been encountered by man and is not hidden. Steinbeck sets the scene by giving vibrant colours to objects like the path in the first paragraph.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work