• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the way that the directors interpret the transition from Dr Jekyll to Mr Hyde in John S. Robertson's 1920 and Maurice Phillips' 2003 films.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the way that the directors interpret the transition from Dr Jekyll to Mr Hyde in John S. Robertson's 1920 and Maurice Phillips' 2003 films. The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson is one of the greatest stories of all time and a literary classic which has been adapted into countless movies . One of the first adaptations of the film was in 1920, directed by John S Robertson and one of he latest adaptations was made in 2003, directed by Maurice Phillips . The adaptation of 1920 was a very high budget film, one of the biggest films of the time. The film starred John Barrymore, one of the best actors of the time , as well as Martha Mansfield and Brandon Hurst. The cast was a high profile one and the film tagline was 'The worlds greatest actor in a tremendous story of man at his best and worst'. This shows that money was spent on the film and the film is still available today. The second, more recent adaptation has been directed by Maurice Phillips in 2003 and stars John Hannah and David Warner. The movie was not shown in cinemas, unlike the 1920 film and is a low budget film which was made for television but nevertheless has many special effects . ...read more.

Middle

There are different colours used in both adaptations of the book as well. The 2003 version is in full colour whereas the 1920 adaptation is in black and white, however, there are different shades of black and white used. The 1920 film uses white light to represent Jekyll, as white has peaceful ,good and religious connotations whereas when Jekyll turns to Hyde, he is now darker, and has more of a shadow, this automatically suggests something sinister and evil. The 2003 adaptation is very similar as Hyde is shown in a shadow in the dark but Jekyll is shown in a lighter area and is not under a shadow. This is similar to the 1920 film and suggests that Jekyll is good whereas Hyde is evil. This is because the dark colours are mysterious whereas white is considered good. Another main part of every film is what the characters say. The main job of the dialogue is to tell the story .In the 1920 version , there is no dialogue as technology at the time did not allow this. There is no sound on the film However, there is text so the viewers can understand what goes on and enjoy the film. The 2003 film is very similar here as even though the technology is far better and allows the characters to talk, there is not much dialogue in this scene. ...read more.

Conclusion

Jekyll is also seen walking into Hyde's footprints which suggests that evil and good are in every man. This coincides with the fact that good vs. evil is one of the main themes of the book . The film also has a special effect where the camera zooms into the eye, which gives the effect that the viewer is going inside Jekyll's mind. Both films use lighting in a very similar way despite the differences in technology. The 1920 adaptation uses white light for the face of Jekyll , to suggest purity and innocence and black for Hyde to represent sinister and evil feelings. The 2003 version is similar in this sense . Hyde being shown in dark light vagueness and immorality. Jekyll , however, has bright lighting on him which has pleasant connotations. This is extremely effective as Hyde and Jekyll both stand face to face during this scene. Both films show the transformation very differently . The 1920 film shows a physical transformation and Barrymore expresses himself very well, which is proved by the fact that he dislocated his jaw while filming the movie. Jekyll turns into a large , ape like animal . This contrasts with the 2003 version where physically both Jekyll and Hyde are the same but inside they are completely different. There is no physical transformation in the film which shows that the director is trying to prove that not everything should be judged on surface value. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Robert Louis Stevenson section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Robert Louis Stevenson essays

  1. Emily Smith Compare the author's treatment of the theme of good and evil in ...

    only light is from the "dull moon" or from the flickering streetlights. These are very symbolistic representations to show the darker side of human nature Stevenson throughout the novel tries to establish through an imagery of evil or menace in which dark streets twist and coil or are draped with fog.

  2. In what way is

    Utterson "...Richard, your tale has gone home. If you have been inexact at any point, you had better correct it." He seemed like an opportunist and took advantage of a situation e.g. the black- mailing incident with Mr. Hyde and the child.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work