• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast two films made by two different directors of, "Romeo and Juliet"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast two films made by two different directors of, "Romeo and Juliet". The two directors made the same story into a movie. There is a difference between the two though, one is an old 1968 version and the other is a more modern 1996 version. The 1968 version, Zefferelli's version, was truer to Shakespeare's original, while the 1996 version, Luhrman's version, had its own originality. In this essay I'm going to compare and contrast the two. The events that happen in Zefferelli's film is completely different from the events in Luhrmann's film. Zefferelli being true to Shakespeare and Luhrmann being modern and true to rock and roll there has to be differences. For instance the opening events in Zefferelli's version are much closer to the way Shakespeare would probably want it. The way it starts is a little more appealing to the older generation because it starts of with the narrator, Lawrence Olivier, speaking with his soothing voice as the camera slowly pans the gentle landscape of Verona City. Also in Zefferelli's film the Capulets start the argument by biting their thumb at the Montagues, then Tybalt, played by Micheal Yorke, comes and turns the argument into a fight, and instead of the police stopping it is the Prince who stops it. ...read more.

Middle

The acting in both films was good though and acting has a huge impact on the audience. If the acting is absolute garbage and everything else is great then the movie still would not be that great. The Zefferelli actors have a better effect on the audience, the same as the Luhrmann actors but better, because the acting helps you to get to know the characters and makes you love, like, dislike or hate a character and gets you into the movie a bit more, which is one advantage Zefferelli has over Luhrmann. Camera shots and angles is another big part in a film. There are many different types of camera shots and angles and many of them were used in both Zefferelli's and Luhrmann's films. In Zefferelli's movie he used a lot of long, high and medium angle shots, to show Verona's lovely landscape, with a lot of panoramics which helps you appreciate the beauty of Verona. Also before and after the fight started he used a lot of sow zooming and close ups to build up tension, which is what Luhrmann, pretty much, done. There is a difference though, Luhrmann takes advantage of the technology and uses higher angle shots, moves the camera faster so the shots and sequences go faster, a lot of extreme close ups, point of view shots, zooms and medium shots. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Luhrmann's film though it is passions and emotions of the characters that help the audience indulge. Both films are fabulous remakes but both have their highs and lows. They have a great effect on audience overall. The effect Zefferelli's version had overall, on me personally, is that it is a good film with humour that is more realistic in showing how Shakespeare's play was but it is more for the forty years and older generation. At the same time it has some magnificent acting and it's easy to keep up with. Luhrmann's overall effect, on me once again, is that it is also a good film with humour but is more a modern film for the fifteen and up generation because of the personality of the characters, the colours, the sword guns and the action and explosions. The acting, however, is terrible but can be overlooked because of the action. Overall they both are stupendous films with glorious opening sequences, but in my opinion, the German Baz Luhrmann's 1996 version is better than the Italian Franco Zefferelli's 1968 version. I prefer modern 20th century settings and action to old fashion 14th century settings and action even though the acting is better. By: Kallai Johnson-Hibbert ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were made by ...

    In Zefferelli's movie he tried to show the characters personality by their words they spoke or their actions, which was similar to Baz Luhrmann, but Baz Luhrmann wanted to use the costumes at the Capulet party to show their relevance and personality in the play.

  2. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    Franco Zeffirelli production, this is projected in the Baz Luhrmann production with fireworks exploding as if Mercutio's mind is exploding, as Mercutio finishes talking. Also the facial expressions in both films are very intense and they have to calm him down.

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    grant for prayers� sake.� Romeo comes back with, 'Then move not, while my prayers� effect I take�. Romeo then kisses Juliet and says, 'Thus from my lips, by thine, my sin is purg�d�. After their little escapade, we meet The Nurse.

  2. Compare and contrast the methods used by Zeffirelli and Luhrmann in the opening scenes ...

    Another major difference in the films that is seen often throughout the Lurhmann film is the actors smoking. Obviously in the time of this play, and in Shakespearian times smoking didn't exist. Something as simple as a lit cigarette in ones hand adds a cool and modern feel to the film.

  1. Consider how the dramatist's work is developed, modified and enhanced by the Zeffirelli and ...

    Again, the media is here used to the advantage of Luhrmann, displaying strong phrases of the chorus as headlines in newspapers, which reflects the intensity of the mutiny between the households as it has made the front page numerous times. The consecutive scene is composed as prose rather than verse.

  2. Compare and contrast the techniques used in the opening sequences of Romeo and Juliet ...

    Comparing the two films, bits of the storyline differed but as for the actual Shakespeare story, that had not changed. In both versions, we are introduced to Benvolio, the Montague gang 'leader' who was actually quite a peace keeper, very much unlike Tybalt, the Capulet gang 'leader' who is a very firey character.

  1. Analyse how Franco Zefferelli and Baz Lurhmann show the hatred between the Montague's and ...

    A man's voice say the words - his voice is quite low and very serious when these word come up and there is also really loud music. The music sounds very religious then the scene changes to a city with a big close up of Jesus then the camera goes straight into a long shoot of the city and statue.

  2. How the two directors (Baz Luhrmann and Zefferelli) convey the opening of Romeo and ...

    I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee," changing the atmosphere completely, adding a threatening note - he seems to be the real aggressor. This sudden change of mood is effective in building up tension. As even the masters of the houses try to enter the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work