Compare Death of a Naturalist, Advancement of Learning and Roe Deer.

Authors Avatar

Death of a naturalist, Advancement of learning and Roe deer

Introduction

The assignment that I will be undertaking is based on the poems Death of a Naturalist, Advancement of Learning and Roe Deer. The Nobel Prize winning poet Seamus Heaney, who was Irish, wrote the two poems Death of a Naturalist and Advancement of Learning. Ted Hughes, who has written a variety of stories, one of which was the famous Iron Man, wrote the poem Roe Deer. The main task of the assignment is to

  • Explain the general meaning and storyline of each poem
  • Consider the feelings and emotions in each poem
  • Discuss the use of language in each poem

These three poems have a similar theme. They are all about nature, specific animals and how the poet sees them through his eyes. In the two poems by Seamus Heaney, the poems are about a change of opinion. In Death of a Naturalist, the poet at first thought frogs were entertaining and interesting however later found out they was atrociously disgusting. He was sickened by them. In Advancement of Learning, Heaney at first does not like rats, but later conquers his fears. In Roe Deer, Hughes finds deers fascinating in his own way. He begins to think he understands what they were saying to him, and then he gradually looses contact with them.

Death of a Naturalist is the poem told by Seamus Heaney as a child point of view. It is about his experience and encounters with frogs. He used to collect frogspawn as a boy but then became suddenly afraid of the frogs. Advancement of Learning is the poem told by the poet Seamus Heaney who is probably now older. The poem is regarding the incidents, which deal with the transition from childish innocence to an awareness of the fundamental threat implicit in all our lives. The poem is about a creature he despises, a rat, but when he really thinks about it, he sees what a pathetic little creature it really is and overcomes his repulsion. Roe Deer is the poem told by Ted Hughes as a man, who tells it in a sort of science fiction way. The poem is all about the possibility of experiences we cannot justify in the world we live in. He believes, as in science fiction, there is a kind of dimension for animals, they suddenly appear out of nowhere. They seem to look at him and try to tell him something but at the end, he looses contact. The deer’s try to justify something to him and when he is just about to understand, like a fortuneteller who loses contact with the spirits, he loses it.

Death of a naturalist

In stanza one the poet is enchanted and obsessed by the frogs, e.g. “warm thick slobber of frogspawn was best of all.”  Every spring he filled jam jars full of frogspawn to see it develop into frogs. The teacher called them “Daddy frog” and “Mammy frog” which is likening them to a happy family. There is a bit of fantasy in this as if it is a children’s story, which shows the imagination of the poet when he was a child.

Join now!

 In stanza two, the picture changes completely. The boy begins to fear the frogs. He was listening to angry frogs invading or barging through the flax. He had not heard the coarse croaking before. This is a new experience, which begins to make him afraid. When he saw them, he was disgusted in some aspects e.g. “farting”. He also sees them as threats. He uses the words that create imagery of war to convey his fears e.g. “Poised like mud grenades”, he said, “ the great slime kings were gathered for vengeance”. How would a person feel if a group ...

This is a preview of the whole essay