• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare how Ted Hughes writes about animals in two of his poems.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare how Ted Hughes writes about animals in two of his poems. You should think about: * the way the animals are portrayed * the words and images Hughes employs * how you respond to the animals in the poems Below is a possible answer to the question above. It is not a model answer, and has several things wrong with it, but would achieve a grade C in the English literature exam. Read through the answer and try to see why it should gain a C. Here are the criteria it needs to match. * Sustained knowledge of text * Structured response to task * Personal involvement/empathy * Appropriate comment on meaning/style * Effective use of reference/supporting textual detail * Sustained comment on social/cultural/historical issues or context Response In both "Work and Play" and "Hawk Roosting" Ted Hughes writes about birds. ...read more.

Middle

Hughes makes his hawk a very violent creature with its "allotment of death". This is quite shocking and almost repulsive. In contrast to the arrogant and almost repulsive attitude of the hawk, the swallow is portrayed as a creature of beauty and grace ("a rainbow of purples") although there is a suggestion of violence ("whiplash") in the swallow too. Hughes uses a variety of linguistic devices to portray his swallow and hawk. He uses personification as the major device to portray the hawk. The hawk is given human qualities and a voice that Hughes uses to portray his hawk's unique personality. Hughes uses violent images to add impact to the hawk's violent nature ("tearing off heads"). ...read more.

Conclusion

However, this is changed at the end to leave the reader with a lasting image of beauty. Hughes uses structure in "Hawk Roosting" to portray the hawk as an orderly animal: keeping the verses the same length creates an image of order. The hawk is portrayed as a violent beast. It comes across as very arrogant and has a very limited view of the world. I think that the hawk was portrayed very effectively as a killing machine. It made me think about how a real hawk might view the world. So I think Hughes portrayed the hawk very well, making it seem as if these could be the thoughts of a real animal. The swallow is portrayed as a very beautiful and elegant creature and I feel that Hughes created such beautiful images to inspire awe and respect for the swallow in the reader ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ted Hughes section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ted Hughes essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Hawk Roosting" by Ted Hughes.

    His specific aim is to kill and his determination to succeed is apparent from poem: "For the one path of my flight is direct through the bones of the living". This line shows the Hawks mental effort to succeed in killing.

  2. How does Ted Hughes convey the ruthless power and violence in animals through the ...

    This line "killers from the egg" completely changes our judgment towards the pike. We question ourselves, how could such a beautiful creature be so ruthless? We get the answer from the phrase "Killers from the egg". Then the word "malevolent" also makes us feel ill of the pike just, as the pike likes to injury to others.

  1. Ted Hughes, the thought fox, is an effective poem on both a literal and ...

    "Across clearings, an eye, A widening, deepening greenness, Brilliantly, concentratedly Coming about its own business" This stanza also shows that the poet is so concentrated on brainstorming that no external factors will have an effect on his thought process, which is stated "Coming about its own business" However, there is

  2. A Critical Comparison Of Ted Hughes Poems: The Stag And Roe-Deer.

    car, and that his view may be partially impaired by the dense snow. He uses "abnormal" at the end of the couplet, which again reminds us of the idea of the different dimensions. The "disintegration" may be referring to the line between the two dimensions.

  1. Compare and contrast the two poems: 'Turkeys Observed' - (Seamus Heaney), and 'View of ...

    It also makes us feel that the dead pig is now nothing and it has no importance - it is just some 'bulk', worth no sympathy at all. Both poets describe the death of their animal, but in very different ways.

  2. Ted Hughes: "Hughes' early poems describe the animal kingdom with exact naturalistic detail. They ...

    It is nearly eight times larger than in the beginning and its grin is now menacing. Another of Hughes' poems "Hawk Roosting" is written from the point of view of the hawk, a bird of prey, which sits roosting in a tree.

  1. "Hughes thinks more highly of animals than humans." How far does his poetry support ...

    Whereas he describes humans in an uncomfortable way to give the impression that they are out of place. He extends this point with the aspect of time, there are several references to time each have a slightly different meaning. "The owl is pale on the gate post like a clock

  2. Ted Hughes famously quoted "What excites my imagination is the war between vitality and ...

    line reminds the reader of the men's fate - "their faces are four decades under the ground" ends the second verse and "Forty years rotting into soil" ends the fourth. This pattern is repeated, as the poet touchingly recalls how their clothes would not be fashionable today, but at the time their shoes shone, which reflects their respectability.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work