Compare how the authors of the two texts use setting and other techniques to heighten tension and atmosphere in "I'm the king of the castle" by Susan Hill, and "The red room", by H.G Wells.

Authors Avatar

Compare how the authors of the two texts use setting and other techniques to heighten tension and atmosphere in “I’m the king of the castle” by Susan Hill, and “The red room”, by H.G Wells.

        The two texts ‘I’m the King of the Castle’, written by Susan Hill, and ‘The Red Room’, written by H.G Wells, use certain techniques and atmosphere, to emphasise different aspects of their work. Some basic differences between the two texts, are ‘I’m the King of the Castle” was written in the 1970s, and ‘The Red Room’, was written pre 20th century.

        The two texts refer to different things, for example, ‘I’m the King of the Castle”, refers bullying and it also has a sinister undertone, and “The Red Room”, is a ghost story, and that means that the length is different, ‘I’m the King of the Castle’, is a novel and is quite a lengthy piece, and ‘The Red Room’, is a short story. I’m the King of the Castle’ is written in the third person, and ‘The red room’, is written in the first person.

        The setting for “I’m the King of the Castle” is ‘Warings’, ‘The red room’ setting is an old castle, the castle wasn’t named, this is possibly because the author thought it would heighten the tension.

        Both of the two texts use personification to build tension. In “I’m the King of the Castle’, the author personifies Warings to build a sinister atmosphere, for example, Hill describes Warings, she saying, ‘The wood of the staircase settled back upon itself. The descriptions in the book, give the house a life of its own, to create a disturbing atmosphere and tension.

        Personification is used in ‘The Red Room’ to similar effect especially with references to shadows, to build atmosphere. ‘Shadows cower and quiver’, and ‘Shadows fell with marvellous distinctness’. Shadows are also personified later, ‘The shadows seemed to take another step towards me’. Wells also writes ‘A monstrous shadow poured and drank’, and shadows are also used when Wells writes, ‘The shadows in the alcove, at the end in particular, had that indefinable quality of a presence, that suggestion of a lurking, living thing, that comes so easily in silence and solitude. Personification is also used to build tension and atmosphere once more. Wells also uses personification, in reference to shadows by saying ‘The one in the alcove flared in a draught, and the fire’s flickering kept the shadows and penumbra perpetually shifting and stirring’.

Join now!

        Personification is used greatly in both the texts, to build tension and atmosphere, and to get the reader more involved with engaging in the texts.

        In the earlier quote ‘stirring’ is especially emotive, suggestive of an awakening as if the man has awakened some mysterious evil, which keeps the reader gripped. These shadows, which keep appearing in the story, are constantly personified to build up tension.

        Repetition is used in various ways in both texts. In ‘I’m the King of the Castle’, the word ‘ugly’ is often used to describe ‘Warings’, to keep the writer informed. This is to emphasise ...

This is a preview of the whole essay