Compare the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding to Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad.

Authors Avatar

I compared the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding to Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad. The novels contain a great deal in common and the similarities between these two novels begin with their authors. The personal experiences of both Golding and Conrad encouraged them to write their novels. William Golding was greatly influenced by the violence and cruelty he witnessed during WWII, which forced him to realize the innate evil in man and his disgusted view of human nature is reflected in Lord of the Flies. Joseph Conrad’s experiences commanding a steamboat down the Belgian Congo showed him man’s capacity for evil and Conrad used his experiences as an outline for Heart of Darkness. The result is that both novels explore the central themes of civilization versus savagery, man’s inhumanity to man, man’s capacity for evil, and the desire for power.

 

Both Conrad and Golding believed in the idea that all human beings have a dark side that is kept in touch by civilization and their novels showed what would happen if a man was isolated from civilization long, enough to begin ignoring the morals that society had enforced upon him. His civilized instincts would begin to compete with his savage instincts to form the conflict between civilization and savagery, which is a major theme in both Lord of the Flies and Heart of Darkness. Jack is one character whose civilized instincts compete with his savage instincts but it isn’t long before his savage instincts take over because there is no one on the island that can stop him from doing what ever he wants. One instance where Jack struggles with the urge to abide by the rules of civilization and the urge to give into savagery is on page 31 where Ralph, Jack, and Simon find a pig caught in creepers and just as Jack draws his knife and raises his arm, his civilized instincts stop him and the pig gets away. When Jack is asked why he didn’t kill the pig, it reads “They knew very well why he hadn’t: because of the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living flesh; because of the unbearable blood”. Also, Jack’s promise that “next time” he will go for the kill foreshadows how he will let his savage instincts take over. Roger also demonstrates the theme of civilization versus savagery on page 62 when he is throwing stones at the littluns it reads, “Roger gathered a handful of stones and began to throw them. Yet there was a space around Henry, perhaps six yards in diameter, into which he dare not throw. Here invisible yet strong, was the taboo of the old life. Round the squatting child was the protection of parents and school and policemen and the law. Roger’s arm was conditioned by a civilization that knew nothing of him and was in ruins”. Roger’s civilizing instincts prevents him from hurting Henry with the stone, but as the novel progresses Roger turns more and more to his savage instincts until he is capable of killing Piggy with a boulder. Kurtz goes through this same thing in Heart of Darkness. He comes from Europe as a civilized man, but soon after he has been isolated from civilization for so long, he no longer feels a need to obey the laws and becomes a murderer and a raider who raids towns for ivory and kills anyone whom he considers to be a rebel.

Join now!

Another theme that ties into both the novels is Man’s inhumanity to man. This is seen in the beating of another person in both the novels. In Lord of the Flies Jack mercilessly beats a boy named Wilfred and gives no reason for his actions. In Heart of Darkness the manager beats a black slave for having lit fire to a shed full of goods. When in reality the manager was relieved that the goods were destroyed because they were the goods that he was supposed to send to Kurtz. The slave was not the one who burned the shed ...

This is a preview of the whole essay