• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. Link the representation of war to the times when the two films were made.

Extracts from this document...


Henry V Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. Link the representation of war to the times when the two films were made. Many films have been made of Shakespeare's play, "Henry V". The two I am analysing are by Laurence Olivier (1944) and Kenneth Branagh (1988). They are made for very different audiences with different aims. Although they seem very different, in some ways, Branagh's version used many techniques of Olivier's. Both productions were performed to communicate the director's feelings on war to the audience and were performed when war had played a part in recent history. Olivier's version is very pro-war in that he glorifies war but at the same time it lacks realism so that it was not too close to the reality that people had to endure at the time. The film was produced in 1944 in the middle of the Second World War so portraying war very realistically would cause uproar in society. There is no sense of death in the film. This differs to Branagh's version which was produced after the Vietnam War. Branagh's film is very anti-war in that it portrays war very realistically. He uses the film to give the audience an accurate depiction of war. The battles in Branagh's version are very graphic and gory whereas Olivier's is comparatively light-hearted. The films were aimed at completely different audiences and had different purposes altogether. They were set in different eras so the audience's response would have been different. Olivier's' purpose in dramatising "Henry V" was to make the English feel good about themselves. Olivier used this film to form propaganda, creating a world of pageantry in which England overcame tremendous odds to gloriously win a continental war. It states at the beginning that the film is dedicated to the English soldiers when it says: "to commandos and airborne troops. ...read more.


The air is filled with smoke and screams of pain and anger are heard. Explosions and sounds of bombs are going off in the background. It is very realistic. During Henry's speech, he is dirty and bloody. He seems frail and cannot speak very clearly unlike in Olivier's version. The speech is very heroic as Henry increases volume towards the end to psyche his soldiers up. Near the end he begins to shout as explosions go off in the background. They all seem worn out, covered in blood and dirt. The music is fast and solemn sounding. There are dramatic images with sweat, blood and dirt. Not many actors are shown but techniques are used to make us imagine there are more actors standing behind. An effective technique is used when Henry's horse rears on its hind legs as he is silhouetted against the explosions and fire. There are conversations like in Olivier's version but the men are fearful and tired. Their topics of conversation are much more appropriate to the situation than in Olivier's version. Both Branagh's version and Olivier's versions included the battle of Agincourt but in enormously dissimilar ways. Olivier portrayed war very light-heartedly. The previous night is portrayed very similarly to the play. Special lighting is used to highlight only certain parts of the faces of the men. This was experimental use of Technicolor. The lights show Henry's face as a silhouette. This makes it all look more overcast and makes Henry look thoughtful. In the morning's preparations, the set for the French's side is very circus like. They all look joyful and confident. They are more relaxed than a realistic army would appear before battle. It shows all the armour and men looking strong and well protected. It then changed dramatically from the upbeat French preparations to the slow and depressing set of the English. There are no sound effects here. ...read more.


The film was aimed to make the audience proud to be English and entering scenes in which English are being punished for treachery would not put across the right message. The scene in which Bardolph is killed is also omitted in the Oliver version as again the English would not have liked to be called traitors. It's also a very gory and emotional scene which may have had an adverse effect on the audience Branagh includes these scenes to show the realism of society and that not all people can be trusted. It conveys the message not to be too proud to be English as not all English are loyal to the country. The scene in which Bardolph dies would flatter the queen in that it shows that leaders have to stick to orders even if they do not want to. It also shows the emotional side to Henry's nature making us feel we know more about his character. Both films were a product of their times and society giving different ideas of war and leadership. Both productions were performed to communicate the director's feelings on war to the audience and were performed when war had played a part in recent history. Although Branagh used many of Olivier's techniques and ideas, the purpose of the film was very different. Both films turned out to be hits even though Branagh had a restricted budget with few actors and less advanced sets and costumes than Olivier. The differences in the films are understandable bearing in mind the difference in the times. If Branagh's film had been shown to the 1940's society, its accurate depiction of war would have caused uproar. If Olivier's film was shown to the 1980's audience, people would not be shocked by it as it was too light-hearted for that society who had become more used to seeing shocking events on the screen. Both were effective in conveying the desired idea of war relevant to the times of release and the director's view. Both were undoubtedly successful in entertaining their respective audiences. ?? ?? ?? ?? Laura Stark ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How Mise -en - scene creates meaning in Gladiator.

    4 star(s)

    This for me is the best use of editing in the whole scene as its really emotional and it brings the scene to a great end, although it may be seen as a bit of an anti climax it is still a brilliant and emotional ending to such a powerful scene.

  2. Enders Game - Summary

    And yet he continues to win, despite his growing hatred for the people in the government that push him and his friends so hard.

  1. Compare and contrast how the poets convey their attitudes to war

    These apostrophes are put in place of the 'e' in certain verbs: "Wonder'd...storm'd...thunder'd" and also "thro'...tho'". This is called elision and it is used to get the attention of the reader and to shorten the words. This makes the line shorter, so as the soldiers are charging, it quickens the pace.

  2. Pre 1914 War Poetry - The Drum and Drummer Hodge analysed.

    The fact that he repeats it could also hint that he also has something different to say about it in this stanza, because he showed war in one light, all the way through the last stanza. It then continues with 'To me it talks of ravaged plains, / And burning towns and ruined swains,'.

  1. Look at a variety of poems but First World War Poet comparing the different ...

    ones country' I personally think the reason Owen wrote this poem was to show his friend the true reality of life at war and the real things you see, not just hear about. The second Poem 'Anthem for doomed youth' was also written by Wilfred Owen in 1917 Is very

  2. A wife in london

    The poem is broken up into two parts because it is set over two days, so the parts mark the days.

  1. Attitudes towards War - "The Man He Killed", "The Drum" & "The Volunteer"

    He also says that he didn't "need any hearse to bear him hence," he wanted to die where he fought the battle. This shows how passionate he was for war, as he was not as ordinary about it as the soldier in The Man He Killed was.

  2. Saving Private Ryan Examine Steven Spielberg's use of images and Presentation of war. ...

    There are both high and low angle shots of all the gravestones. This is to show us the vast amount of graves there are symbolising the faceless nature of war. This scene ends with a close-up on Ryan's face, which zooms in to go to a big close-up and then, an extreme close-up of his eye.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work