Compare the representations of Frankenstein in Branagh's Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and the 1931 film Frankenstein directed by James Whale

Authors Avatar

Lucie Parry 10 C

Compare the representations of Frankenstein in

Branagh’s Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and the 1931 film Frankenstein directed by James Whale

Language-

1931:

Camera -

  • Close ups are not used on Frankenstein as Branagh wants people to wonder what he looks like.
  • There are lots of pans to show the set and the people there.
  • There is a close up on the monsters hand when it is twitching.
  • There aren’t many edits which makes it boring and not very interesting.

Sound –

  • Diegetic sound is the machines, Frankenstein shouting, noise of the monster being taken up.
  • Non-diegetic sound is the thunder; there is no music at all in the extract.

Mise-en-scene –

  • Henry Frankenstein is wearing a lab coat/straight jacket, which gives the impression that he is crazy.
  • He has slicked back hair using hair oil.
  • The acting style is very over the top, like theatrical acting.
  • Frankenstein is side lit, to make him look scared and horrified.
  • Overall the lighting is mostly by top lights and sometimes the lightening.
Join now!

1994:

Camera –

  • There are lots of frantic zooms, pans and also up and down shots, which makes the audience intimidated.
  • The camera follows Frankenstein and shows his emotions/feelings.
  • The edits are very fast and unnoticeable, using cuts and jump cuts.
  • By making the editing quicker, this builds up the tension.

Sound –

  • Diegetic sound are the chains, machines moving, bangs, slots into the body, the electricity sparks and also Frankenstein’s voice and movements.
  • Non - diegetic sound is the dramatic theme music, building up to create much more tension.
  • ...

This is a preview of the whole essay