• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the speeches of Brutus and Antony in Act 3 scene 2 analysing the various techniques they use to persuade the crowd to their opinion. Which speech is more effective and why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare the speeches of Brutus and Antony in Act 3 scene 2 analysing the various techniques they use to persuade the crowd to their opinion. Which speech is more effective and why? Caesar is dead and the people are looking for their next ruler, so are easily suede in the tide of opinions. Two different speeches, two possible outcomes, two great leaders. One could tear Rome apart, and one could bring it together. The fate of the Roman Empire is in the hands of the rabble. Antony and Brutus have stepped up to wield them, Brutus for the good of Rome, and Antony to exact vengeance on the murderers of Caesar. ...read more.

Middle

Another mistake was that Brutus left the forum, leaving Antony to usurp his new control of the people and sway their opinions once more. Antony's first major tool in his speech was the bloody carcass of Caesar, which adds a vital visual impact, increasing the fundamental elements of his speech; sadness, pity, sympathy, and anger! He starts off with "friends" this time unlike Brutus' "Romans" personalising his speech so it means more to the crowd. His speech is structured, with an obvious attempt to keep the lines of a similar length and rhythm which gives more of an impact. He repeats the words "honourable" and ambition eventually to such an extent that they loose there meaning and almost become insults. ...read more.

Conclusion

And now Antony is trying to stir up the crowd to go against, or even hate Brutus. His pause at the end of the first section leaves time for him to assess the crowd of how they are reacting to his words and also adds to his show to gain sympathy and sadness. His next section adds a new angle, Caesar's will. Antony now uses a lot of reverse psychology to increase the crowd's interest in the will, Caesar and on his words. Ultimately Antony's speech was far better than Brutus' was, it was well structured and planned and worked into the minds of the plebeians and bent them to his will. Antony made far better use of rhetoric and so the crowd was in his favour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Antony's use of rhetoric in Act3, Scene2 is more effective than Brutus'.

    4 star(s)

    Another of his favoured persuasive devices is antithesis7 such as, '...not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.', this sentence is combined with use of isocolon8 in order to increase the effect of exordium9 which makes the audience listen to his argument.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of the speeches of Brutus and Antony in Act 3 Scene ...

    order to make Plutarch's story performable - he condenses the time span of the play. For example, he places Caesar's triumph over Pompey's defeat in February, whereas his victory was in October according Plutarch's account. Moreover, in the play, Brutus and Cassius flee from Rome immediately after Antony has made

  1. Refer to Act 1 Scene 2, Act 2 Scene 1 and Act 4 Scene ...

    Brutus has taken this role he makes available his own house and garden as a meeting place. He wants to send out a message to the conspirators that now he is going to be in charge and he is going to be the leader of the conspiracy.

  2. Refer to Act 1 Scene 2, Act 2 Scene 1 and Act 4 Scene ...

    disagrees saying he is not worthy of being called, Cassius immediately agrees with him. This shows Cassius is being belittled; he also appears to be self-effacing. Cassius suggests that Antony should die with Caesar, because he is a cunning planner and could put them all in danger.

  1. By comparing and contrasting the dramatic presentation of Act 3 Scene 2 in the ...

    His first point is to declare to the crowd how honourable he is. Brutus stresses the words 'believe' and 'honour' (L.14-15), repeating them to leave a lasting impression in the minds of the crowd. Brutus is suggesting that the crowd should trust him and respect him because of his honour.

  2. Brutus and Antony's speeches.

    So if you don't agree with Brutus killing Caesar you couldn't say anything because of the way he asks the question. Brutus knows this he is so confident that no one will say anything he says ' I pause for a reply' and of course there is none.

  1. Explain how the Parts of Cassius [in Act I] and Mark Antony [in Act ...

    The word immortal is used ironically and is the first sign of Cassius's true intentions. In this first phase Cassius knows that before he can persuade Brutus into joining the cause he must first have him on his side and so he uses the praise and flattery to do this.

  2. In which way does Marc Antony’s speech sway the crowd?

    Certainly these two men are very prepared but sometimes your knowledge doesn't matter if you are standing next to a man that can transmit that knowledge to the people. From a start of Caesar's murder, Brutus without think in it twice, he goes to talk to the people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work