• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the style and impact of Brutus and Antony’s orations in Act 3 Scene 2 of “Julius Caesar”.

Extracts from this document...


Salmaan Bhutta 10.1 English literature coursework Julius Caesar The Question Compare the style and impact of Brutus and Antony's orations in Act 3 Scene 2 of "Julius Caesar". The answer Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare sometime between 1596 and 1599ad. The play is set in ancient Rome and starts just after Caesars return from defeating Pompey. Cassius leads some other patricians in a plot to kill Caesar. They plan this because they feel Caesar is becoming too ambitious and fear for the good of Rome. Cassius gets Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, Mettellus Cimber, Decius Brutus, Cauis Ligarius and the almighty Brutus together. They go to kill Caesar but decide not to kill Antony. They all decide to stab him in the Capitol. After this Brutus and Cassius go to the pulpits to explain themselves and convince the people of Rome that this was good for them. Antony then comes to speak but he doesn't want to convince the crowd he wants to stir up resentment and hatred against the conspirators so they are compelled to kill them. In this essay I will be comparing the style and impact of Brutus and Antony's speeches in the pulpit. I will compare them by looking at the tone, language, the effect on the crowd, the effect on the audience and what is revealed about the characters of the speakers. ...read more.


O judgement, thou art fled to brutish beasts". After this he describes the murder so becomes very passionate "And as he plucked his cursed steel away, Mark how the blood of Caesar followed it". He becomes very disingenuous saying, "I am no orator as Brutus is" It seems Antony then should become more and more enraged but manages seems to keep control and just make the crowd become enraged. The next comparison point is the affect on the crowd that each speaker has. At the beginning of the scene the crowd are hungry for reasons to Caesar's death and are in a raucous mood. The affect Brutus has is to calm them down and explain the reasons "I loved Rome more" He is trying to appeal to their common sense. This is a bad idea by Brutus because it becomes obvious later in his speech that they have no common sense. I am referring to when the crowd offer Brutus the very thing he killed Caesar for they ironically offer Brutus the crown. "Let Caesars better parts be crowned in Brutus" If the affect on the crowd were like a pop concert Brutus would be a support group brought in to warm up the crowd for the superstar performer, Antony. This is effectively what Brutus does he just gets them ready and calms them down a bit for Antony. ...read more.


This also shows Brutus' over confidence in himself and the crowd. He thinks he will tell the crowd what he has to and they will respect him and that will be it. I think the reason this is undone by Antony and the final revelation about Antony is he has the common touch. He can relate to the plebeians, which means they can relate to him, which means they are more likely to respond to him. Personally I agree with the statement that Antony's speech is the best speech written by Shakespeare. Well definitely so far from the Shakespeare I have read. His speech is far better than Brutus' as far as language, tone; affect on the crowd and affect on the audience are concerned. The language his use of imagery and honourable to a negative effect seem infinitely better than Brutus' use of honourable to remind everyone he's Brutus. In tone Antony's manipulation and suspense add drama and intrigue after a rather dull boring speech by Brutus. I didn't think it was really fair to compare Brutus' speech to Antony's as far as affect on people. Whether it is the crowd or audience Antony totally turns them round to his view or the way he wants them to be. That's not to say Brutus' oration didn't have good bits like his tone to calm and language to remind. But if put on a scales I think they would tip heavily towards Antony's side on good point. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Antony's use of rhetoric in Act3, Scene2 is more effective than Brutus'.

    4 star(s)

    'Believe me for mine honour and have respect for mine honour that you may believe', is a prime example of ethos. In this phrase, Brutus attempts to show the crowd that he 'is an honourable man', an idea that Antony virulently counteracts during his speech6.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why is Antony a more effective speaker than Brutus?

    3 star(s)

    Antony continues to make his speech effective with the use of imagery in order to evoke sympathy. The first imagery he uses is of his 'heart [being] in the coffin...with Caesar'. As this imagery invoke sympathy, Antony is trying to convince the plebeians that he is a much more noble man than Brutus and thus win their support.

  1. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious; If it were so, it was a grievous fault, And grievously hath Caesar answer`d it. Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest, For Brutus is an honourable man; So are they all, all honourable men; Come I to speak in Caesar`s funeral.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of the speeches of Brutus and Antony in Act 3 Scene ...

    and the audience knows that this man is not to be trusted. They also observe that Caesar is liked by many, as seen at the beginning of the play when the crowd rejoices in the return of Caesar. This illustrates that Shakespeare wants the audience to realise that Caesar is

  1. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    He has succeeded. However Brutus feels that this is not enough, he needs some security that will keep the crowd to his way of thinking. So his third rhetorical question is again appealing to their sense of patriotism 'Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman?'

  2. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    "Room for Antony most noble Antony" was a remark from one plebeian, showing that they Antony has persuaded the plebeians well and do not believe Brutus. Antony adds emotion to his speech, and by being emotional he is able to be more powerful and stir the feelings of the plebeians.

  1. With close reference to the text explain how Mark Antony manipulates the crowd after ...

    Furthermore Antony mentions Ate "With Ate by his side, come hot from hell." Ate is the goddess of vengeance, disorder and mischief. Therefore, in mentioning her one can speculate how far Antony will go in order to get revenge. Antony plans to manipulate the plebeians into rising in mutiny to enable him to get revenge.

  2. English Course Work 2 On Julius Ceaser

    (Line 2)" then he says "Romans, countrymen, and lovers! (Line 13)". You can see the flattery he is trying to use again and again "Good countryman, (Line 57)". Shakespeare uses prose for Brutus's speech like a textbook, rather than verses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work