• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the style and impact of Brutus and Antony’s orations in Act 3 Scene 2 of “Julius Caesar”.

Extracts from this document...


Salmaan Bhutta 10.1 English literature coursework Julius Caesar The Question Compare the style and impact of Brutus and Antony's orations in Act 3 Scene 2 of "Julius Caesar". The answer Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare sometime between 1596 and 1599ad. The play is set in ancient Rome and starts just after Caesars return from defeating Pompey. Cassius leads some other patricians in a plot to kill Caesar. They plan this because they feel Caesar is becoming too ambitious and fear for the good of Rome. Cassius gets Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, Mettellus Cimber, Decius Brutus, Cauis Ligarius and the almighty Brutus together. They go to kill Caesar but decide not to kill Antony. They all decide to stab him in the Capitol. After this Brutus and Cassius go to the pulpits to explain themselves and convince the people of Rome that this was good for them. Antony then comes to speak but he doesn't want to convince the crowd he wants to stir up resentment and hatred against the conspirators so they are compelled to kill them. In this essay I will be comparing the style and impact of Brutus and Antony's speeches in the pulpit. I will compare them by looking at the tone, language, the effect on the crowd, the effect on the audience and what is revealed about the characters of the speakers. ...read more.


O judgement, thou art fled to brutish beasts". After this he describes the murder so becomes very passionate "And as he plucked his cursed steel away, Mark how the blood of Caesar followed it". He becomes very disingenuous saying, "I am no orator as Brutus is" It seems Antony then should become more and more enraged but manages seems to keep control and just make the crowd become enraged. The next comparison point is the affect on the crowd that each speaker has. At the beginning of the scene the crowd are hungry for reasons to Caesar's death and are in a raucous mood. The affect Brutus has is to calm them down and explain the reasons "I loved Rome more" He is trying to appeal to their common sense. This is a bad idea by Brutus because it becomes obvious later in his speech that they have no common sense. I am referring to when the crowd offer Brutus the very thing he killed Caesar for they ironically offer Brutus the crown. "Let Caesars better parts be crowned in Brutus" If the affect on the crowd were like a pop concert Brutus would be a support group brought in to warm up the crowd for the superstar performer, Antony. This is effectively what Brutus does he just gets them ready and calms them down a bit for Antony. ...read more.


This also shows Brutus' over confidence in himself and the crowd. He thinks he will tell the crowd what he has to and they will respect him and that will be it. I think the reason this is undone by Antony and the final revelation about Antony is he has the common touch. He can relate to the plebeians, which means they can relate to him, which means they are more likely to respond to him. Personally I agree with the statement that Antony's speech is the best speech written by Shakespeare. Well definitely so far from the Shakespeare I have read. His speech is far better than Brutus' as far as language, tone; affect on the crowd and affect on the audience are concerned. The language his use of imagery and honourable to a negative effect seem infinitely better than Brutus' use of honourable to remind everyone he's Brutus. In tone Antony's manipulation and suspense add drama and intrigue after a rather dull boring speech by Brutus. I didn't think it was really fair to compare Brutus' speech to Antony's as far as affect on people. Whether it is the crowd or audience Antony totally turns them round to his view or the way he wants them to be. That's not to say Brutus' oration didn't have good bits like his tone to calm and language to remind. But if put on a scales I think they would tip heavily towards Antony's side on good point. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Antony's use of rhetoric in Act3, Scene2 is more effective than Brutus'.

    4 star(s)

    Another of his favoured persuasive devices is antithesis7 such as, '...not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.', this sentence is combined with use of isocolon8 in order to increase the effect of exordium9 which makes the audience listen to his argument.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why is Antony a more effective speaker than Brutus?

    3 star(s)

    Antony continues to make his speech effective with the use of imagery in order to evoke sympathy. The first imagery he uses is of his 'heart [being] in the coffin...with Caesar'. As this imagery invoke sympathy, Antony is trying to convince the plebeians that he is a much more noble man than Brutus and thus win their support.

  1. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    Antony continues with saying "Moreover he has left you all his walks, his private arbours and new-planted orchards, on this side of Tiber" which is ironic as Caesar has not left this to the plebeians, yet as Antony is very persuasive they now believe anything he tells them.

  2. Julius Caesar - How does Shakespeare use the events, themes and language present in ...

    Whilst delaying the will for suspense, Antony delivers a dramatic anecdote as he relates back to the day when Caesar was assassinated. He descends to the plebeians and explains what happened when conspirators stabbed Caesar. Antony shows what happened in Caesar's point of view, and uses the tear marks in the mantle to show how vicious these conspirators where.

  1. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    It is not only the power of the orator to awake and arouse a reaction in the audience but the audience themselves that want to be awoken and have shared values and meanings. In conclusion, Mark Antony's speech is most important in this play, which focuses so much on gaining

  2. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    go against Rome then you are not deserving of your Roman status. Immediately after Brutus' fourth rhetorical question he uses a good persuasive technique, he pauses and tells them why 'I pause for a reply' This is a clever tactic from Brutus because he needs to ensure that the plebeians are firmly on his side.

  1. How do Brutus and Cassius change throughout the play of Julius Csar?

    Regardless of this, Brutus continues and mocks his temper, stating: "Go show your slaves how choleric you are, And make bondmen tremble. Must I budge? Must I Observe you? Must I stand and crouch Under your testy humour? By the gods, You shall digest the venom of you spleen, Though it do split you.

  2. Examine all the soliloquies spoken by Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony.

    Cassius now reveals his plan of how he will fully convince Brutus to be part of the conspiracy. The audience are surprised by Cassius; from being supposedly an honourable citizen, to becoming a sly and cunning traitor. From now on, the audience wonder if Cassius will really convince Brutus to be part of his evil scheme.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work