• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the two books Frankenstein and Jurassic Park and pay particular attention to the language used, time in which the book was written and any other issues raised.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Daniel Freeman 11v1 Compare the two books Frankenstein and Jurassic Park and pay particular attention to the language used, time in which the book was written and any other issues raised. I am going to be looking the following two books in this essay Mary Shelly's Frankenstein and Michael Chricton's Jurassic Park. Frankenstein is a fictional biography of a man by the name of Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein is a man who has been heavily involved in science his entire life, but he is not into the conventional sciences his interests are within the more alternative sciences. These interests result in Frankenstein having a radical new idea. He desires to create a living creature using the `spare parts' of deceased human beings. But when he meets his goal he is filled with regret as he learns what he has created is far from human and never could be. And if it had any kind of existence it would be an unbearable and painful one. His creation would be forced to hide within the shadows of society and treated as an outcast when his only desire is to be accepted as a human. But he knows the only reason he can't is because of his gruesome looks. ...read more.

Middle

Whereas in Frankenstein the story is of Frankenstein's pursuit of the monster he created, the evil within it and its hatred and loathing towards mankind. Also the books differ in ending and the way the reader is left after finishing the book. Jurassic park's ending leaves you feeling happy and hopeful after the book tells you of how all the `baddies' get either killed by the dinosaurs or the trail of destruction behind them and the `goodies' escape the island reasonably unharmed so I suppose you would say that was a happy ending. Compare this to Frankenstein's ending which mainly consists of everyone dieing be it a favourable character or even the monster himself who Shelly seems to make you feel sorry for towards the end and actually dare I say it, like, well, he banishes himself from society and walks off into the snow in the hope of dieing. This could also be a reflection of the consumer in the different times nowadays we like to hear nice happy ending to a story but when Frankenstein was written it was a very dark time and a dark and malevolent ending was much more suitable for the consumer of that period in time (If they could even read it anyway). Another obvious difference between the two books is the language adopted for each one. ...read more.

Conclusion

I enjoyed reading both of these books and it was interesting to compare them the books are very similar in so many ways but still written so differently both writers should be proud of producing such excellent pieces of literature. I must say though being a boy born in the late 20^th century and being stereotypically lazy I did enjoy reading Jurassic park more than I did Frankenstein but I think this is because I had an idea more about what they were saying and the language was clearer. Another part of it would have to be that I found it easier to relate with the characters in Jurassic Park as they seemed more normal than good old Victor and of course being from the same period of time as them helps. Chricton's book gives the reader more of an action packed thrill ride, whereas Shelly's was more of an emotional book although still gruesome and quite enjoyable and it is much more mature book and didn't give u the impression it is deliberately accessible it also is a lot more personal and had Shelly's views all the way through but between the lines. But a great man once said: "Don't let acceptance exempt your expression. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Some good points made but not always expressed as coherently as they could be.
Make sure that if you are comparing two texts that is actually what happens and very specific similarities and differences are considered.

4 Stars

Marked by teacher Laura Gater 29/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Frankenstein essay

    3 star(s)

    When Victor tries to escape from the horror of his creature and its actions he runs off to Chamonix, in the French Alps. However the creature follows him here and tells his story. I think Chamonix is a clever location for this part of the book because it fits in well with feelings of the characters.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Frankenstein has been described as a 'novel of the Gothic genre' do you feel ...

    4 star(s)

    This emphasises that Frankenstein is not just a Gothic novel as the monster would only be presented as a villain causing immense devastation and grief. The more he reads the more he recognises his situation and feels neglected by society; 'I applied much personally to my own feelings and condition...

  1. Frankenstein: The theme of abortion

    Justine accused of killing William by exclaiming: "to have murdered the son of her benefactor, a child whom she nursed from its birth, and appeared to love as if it had been her own! I could not consent to the death of any human being, but certainly I should have

  2. Look at the significance of chapter five to the novel as a whole. Focus ...

    I was nourished with high thoughts of honour and devotion. But now vice has degraded me beneath the meanest animal. . . . the fallen angel becomes a malignant devil. . . . I am quite alone.' At the beginning of chapter 5, the language that Mary uses helps her to build up the setting.

  1. What is the importance of the Creatures Narrative to the Novel?

    I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous." This quotation presents to the reader the creature's own situation in a surprisingly articulate fashion, on top of which it uses the romantic image of a child being of uncorrupted innocence only to be corrupted by society (".

  2. Discuss the nature of monsters in Frankenstein and Beowulf.

    If he did people would be shocked that he had created the monster. Indirectly he killed the people by making the monster and so he to should be seen as a monster. The character of the creature is difficult to call a monster because though he kills peoples it seems that it is not totally all his fault.

  1. What are the parallels, or lack of parallels, between Walton's and Victor's experiences and ...

    There are many similarities between two of the main characters in Frankenstein, Walton and Frankenstein, and as the reader we wonder whether Mary Shelley intended for us to recognise these, so that we can see the ignorance of both characters, and therefore contrast it to the innocence of the monster.

  2. 'Frankenstein Essay' - With reference to chapters 11-16, trace the development and change in ...

    (like a child with acquired taste) After leaving the hut the monster has his second encounter with man, he arrives at a village. (the village represents human community) He sees this as his chance to gain companionship and so approaches some houses until he hears their reaction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work