• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the two poems, "Nothings changed" by Tatamkhulu Afrika with Charlotte O'Neil's song by Fiona Farrell.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare the two poems, "Nothings changed" by Tatamkhulu Afrika with Charlotte O'Neil's song by Fiona Farrell When comparing the poems, 'Nothings changed' and 'Charlotte O'Neil's song' we see that they are set in different time periods and in different cultures. Charlotte O'Neil's song is set in the 19th century whereas; the poem Nothings Changed is set in the 20th century. However, despite this they are both autobiographical accounts about the injustices and inequalities of their own respective cultures. In effect, both poets are protesting about their life. The narrator of 'Nothings Changed' is a black peasant living in South Africa, and the narrator of 'Charlotte O'Neil's song is a maid serving a master in England. In 'Nothings Changed' the language of the poem is written in the present tense and although he is recalling the past, it is as if the poet is re-living the experience as he writes. Tatamkhulu is protesting about the differences in the way that black and white people are treated South Africa. He begins the poem in a calm mood, his description of the way he walks down towards where he use to live, tells ...read more.

Middle

The word 'squats' is not as though it were sitting, but as though it were occupying the land illegally. 'Incipient' means imported, thus saying the trees from the local area are not good enough so they had to get imported trees. The inn is also saying that to the narrator that it is too good for him and other coloured people in the area, it's almost as if the inn has a bad attitude towards coloured people in the area, as would the white people do who built the inn and those who run it. Comparing it with Charlotte O'Neil's song, it begins with comparing what it is like for her and she makes comparisons between the lives of how the rich live and how the poor live, "You lay on a silken pillow. I lay on an attic cot. That's the way it should be, you said" So she is saying that you are comfortable and I am not and it is similar to Nothings changed as there is a rich/poor divide where the poor are classes as lazy and worthless but as for the rich they were hardworking and ...read more.

Conclusion

So she is able to get out of her situation. Both narrators have both chosen to protest about different inequalities with words, and they do it well. The narrator in 'Nothings changed' protested about the difficulties faced by black people in South Africa, he bitterly recalls the injustices of racism and argues this situation has not changed. The narrator for 'Charlotte O'Neil's song' protested about the inequalities which faced by the poor in 19th century England. Both poems are similar, in the way that they both talk about hardship and horrible injustices in the human society. However, the narrator for 'Charlotte O'Neil's song', has a positive ending, the reader can celebrate charlotte's defiance and independence as she is about to escape the known bad and exchange it for a possible good future. By contrast, the narrator for 'Nothings changes' could not escape his situation whatever he did, just because of the colour of his skin. There is one definite feeling that both poems are talking about the same thing. injustice. They are poems that raise and to a degree complain about issues related to their cultural orgins, but which could be universalised living in todays world. People today still face problems with inequality, racism and injustice. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Tatamkhulu Afrika: Nothings Changed section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Tatamkhulu Afrika: Nothings Changed essays

  1. The two poems I have chosen which convey feelings of alienation and frustration that ...

    This makes him reflect that despite the changing political situation, there are still huge inequalities between blacks and whites. Even though South Africa is supposed to have changed, he knows that the new restaurant is really 'whites-only'. He feels that nothing has really changed.

  2. Comparing how the themes of freedom and oppression are explored in the poems 'Caged ...

    He disagreed with the unjust towards black Americans; this tells us that Afrika was a man of good nature. "Small round stones click", sensory language has been used here which tells us that life as a Black American was uncomfortable, full of suffering and pain.

  1. How do Tatamkhulu Afrika and Imtiaz Dharker make us aware of the society they ...

    The author Tatamkhulu Afrika express's a lot of deep anger in her poem. She does this by including various sentences that clearly demonstrate her levels of anger. These are towards the fact that there has been constant racism and segregation in district 6 and that it is said that there is no more segregation here.

  2. Compare 'Presents from my Aunts in Pakistan' by Moniza Alvi and 'Nothings Changed' by ...

    In 'Presents from my aunts in Pakistan' the poet describes how she is opening her gifts from her Pakistani relatives like "a salwar kameez peacock blue" and juxtaposing them with "...cardigans from marks and Spencer" and "...denim and corduroy" This shows up the difference between the two cultures as the

  1. "Nothing's Changed", by Tatamkhulu Afrika, and the poem "Island Man", by Grace Nichols. Each ...

    which is completely out of place; it is "Brash" and "it squats". As I mentioned before his connection with this place was because he lived there and he was against the apartheid. The "whites only inn" has brought about a non official segregation through money.

  2. Half Cast and Nothing's changed essay

    sky' shows a natural image - that there is nothing wrong with the mixture of colours as it occurs in nature. It is also a form of imagery and personification as it presents the image of colours mixing and is providing human-like features to the light and shadow as they mix.

  1. In the following essay I will endeavour to compare the two poems. Nothing changed ...

    shows how white people did not care about given the area a suitable name when the person said 'No sign says it is: but we know where we belong' this is ironic it as if they are speaking out. Towards the end of the last stanza in, 'Hands burn for a stone, a bomb, to shiver down the glass.'

  2. 'Nothing's Changed' A poem by Tatamkhulu Afrika

    only clear outside District 6 but in it he sees everything unclear. Also he just walked through all the weeds and when he exits it with the backlighting, there us a sense of power that he can cope with anything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work