Compare the ways in which tension is created in these two opening sequences of 'Great Expectations': David Lean's 1946 version and Julian Jarrold's 1999 version.

Authors Avatar

Compare the ways in which tension is created in these two opening sequences of ‘Great Expectations’: David Lean’s 1946 version and Julian Jarrold’s 1999 version.

In the beginning of Great Expectations we meet Pip, a lonely, fearful boy.  In both opening sequences, Julian Jarrold and David Lean encourage the viewer to feel sorry for Pip.  Both directors do this successfully by manipulating Pip’s innocence and his existence without a mother or a father.  In the 1999 version, the establishing shot shows Pip very small in the bleak, desolate background compared to his surroundings, the vast marshland.  Lean applies the long shot to full effect by showing Pip in the background as tiny and innocent.  This is one of the many ways David Lean tries to stimulate the viewer’s sympathy for Pip.  Lean presents Pip as a clean, well dressed young boy and again forces the viewer to show compassion for Pip through exploiting his innocent appearance in his actions of weeding the grave and in the way he runs and looks around warily.  Lean shows Pip going over to his mother and father’s grave and shows him weeding the grave predominantly to gain the viewer’s sympathy.  We view the dark and ominous looking clouds and the trees which look like intimidating faces through Pip’s eyes.  This is because David Lean wishes the viewer to sympathize for Pip, and so allows the viewer into Pips imagination and thoughts.  The setting of a lonely boy on his own in the immense marshland contributes to Pip’s vulnerability.  Lean zooms into to show Pips eyes and then the swaying trees consequently preparing us for the encounter with the convict.

In the 1999 adaptation of the story Julian Jarrold tries to create atmosphere by opening with a shot of a peaceful, empty cornfield until we suddenly see Pip from between the corn.  There is tranquillity in the first shot and the viewer feels relaxed.  The viewer has no idea what is going to happen until Pip begins to run.  Jarrold uses slow motion filming to show great detail of the surroundings and also to create suspense and frustration in the viewer as we want Pip to run faster and escape from whatever he is running from.  This causes tension and fear and further encourages the viewer’s anxiety for Pip as we see him look back in fear and plummet to the ground.  Julian Jarrold’s presentation of Pip is somewhat different in comparison to David Lean’s presentation.  Jarrold presents Pip as very grubby and scruffy, and uses this ‘poorly kept’ image to stimulate the viewer’s sympathy.  Jarrold does not seek to get as much sympathy from the viewer as Lean had.  Pip is shown to be hiding between two graves, although we are not directly informed that these are his parents graves, Pip crying out “Mummy!” is the only thing that suggests that he is hiding between his parents graves and again Jarrold tries to rekindle the viewer’s sympathy for Pip.  The point at which the viewer is likely to feel the most sorry for Pip is when he runs home and is attacked by his sister.  We feel sorry for Pip because he has not been able to find refuge after the awfully frightening encounter with the convict.

Join now!

When we first meet the convict in both versions we are able to immediately see how intimidating he can be.  He is presented very similarly in both versions of the story.  In David Lean’s version the convict speaks ungrammatically, informing the viewer that he is uneducated.  An illustration of this is when the convict says, “I wish I was a frog, or a eel.”  The way in which is does not use correct English, where he isn’t using ‘an’, sounds comical and makes his appearance seem less threatening.  In a way, Lean is seeking to create sympathy for the convict ...

This is a preview of the whole essay