• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare two poems that look at different aspects of war and explain how each of them is effective

Extracts from this document...


Into Battle...does it matter? Compare two poems that look at different aspects of war and explain how each of them is effective - (typed up timed essay) Does it really matter that you go into battle? According to Julian Grenfell it was a thing of virtue and patriotism. In his poem entitled "Into Battle", he talks of the glory and joy of tumbling over the ridge into the brazen frenzy. Julian Grenfell highlights the emotions felt before going to World War One. He galvanises the joys of war by euphemism. His diction entices the reader into thinking that the only way to fully enjoy life was by following Destined Will. He insisted that the true way to lead a human away from a stagnant and boring life was to go and fight for your country. "Dulce et decorum est" - this quote from the title of another poem significantly portrays what Grenfell thought. Although Wilfred Owen was contradicting the idea of grandeur in his poem, Grenfell believed that the struggle for survival was only a natural course to take. The title Into Battle seems to suggest a jaunty and uplifting motion. The idea of going 'into battle' was one to look forward to. Grenfell starts off the poem by using Mother Nature to inspire young men. ...read more.


His dictions is very contained and he makes sure that none of the words sound jarring. The soft wings are an impression of how angels will come to take those who have fallen for their country. Overall, it is romanticised and not in the least bit pragmatic. Many poems look at opposing aspects to those described in Into Battle, namely those written in Spring Offensive. However, I have chosen to compare "Into Battle" with "Does it matter?" by Siegfried Sassoon, simply because it is different. Sassoon sets a completely distinct tone, atmosphere, mood and image to his work. He uses numerous literary techniques to portray his true feelings. Unlike Grenfell, Sassoon uses virulent words which seem to attack the reader. One gets the feeling that Sassoon was foaming at the mouth by the time he had finished writing the poem. He launches into his scathing attack almost instantaneously, without giving the reader any time to think. The structure of the poem is very different to the one in "Into Battle". It is short (only three verses), sharp and succinct. He knew only too well the consequences of living through war and then having to come and live it every night in your dreams. He uses sarcasm to pretend to agree with the civilian speaker at the beginning of each of the stanzas and then contradict them by ending the verse on a very sardonic note. ...read more.


Each sentence is short, sharp and pointy. He has used strong consonants: hunting, sight and matter. The repetitive usages of the't' sound adds emphasis to this. He has even used a rhyming scheme to make the poem look jovial, but the rhyming words are contrasting too: blind - kind and glad - mad. He uses colloquial style language to really hit out at the virulent truths and shows how war is not romantic. He uses anapaest metre (where two unstressed syllables are followed by a stressed one) to symbolise the incongruous aspects of war. Everything is completely different to what the public imagine it to be. The glass painting which Grenfell took so long to paint with his intense pathetic fallacy and elaborate words has been immediately shattered by Sassoon's concise blade. Both poems are so contrasting to each other, that it is quite oxymoronic. Grenfell focuses on the idyllic, romantic, pre-war propaganda, whereas Sassoon highlights the aftermath and consequences of was. The structure, rhyme scheme, rhythm and literary techniques are also in contrast. Grenfell has a slow, soft and comforting style, on the other hand, Sassoon has written a cacophonous, satirical and virulent poem. I personally prefer "Does it matter?" because it is not at all pessimistic, but really depicts the harsh realities of war. I, in fact, despise how those like Grenfell have tried to romanticise war just to have lead more young men to their deaths! ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Comparing poems section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Comparing poems essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Dulcet decorum est

    3 star(s)

    The term has no real language feature but when deeply analysed. It is as if the tramp is the only person there to say good by which compares to the original send offs which were very glorious and honourable. The phrase from Dulce et Decorum Est which most resembles this

  2. In my essay I will be comparing the two poems nothings changed by Tatamkhulu ...

    he wanted people to know just how they are being treated and how difficult it is for them to live excluded from other parts of the town. The word white has to commas on either side this is because he wants us to pay more attention to that word white.

  1. Compare how Wilfred Owen uses the natural world to reinforce the suffering that the ...

    Owen uses personification to describe the pain from the winds, using the words 'knife us', shows that something like the wind was causing so much pain to the soldiers. Knives are usually associated with pain so the words 'merciless and knifes' shows that the wind went through the soldiers creating

  2. Comparing Three War Poems: "The Charge of the Light Brigade", "Who's for the Game" ...

    The reader thinks it is their duty to go to war because of the inspiring personification in these lines: "Your country is up to her neck in a fight and she's looking and calling for you". Moreover, it involves the reader.

  1. Compare the way the poems Half-Caste(TM) and Nothing(TM)s Changed(TM) deal with the ...

    phrases such as, 'explain yuself / wha yu mean / when yu say half-caste' are repeated. I think this repetition builds up anger within the poet, therefore from a conversation it turns into an argument. This is shown in line 22 'ah rass/' where he uses a rude expression to show his feelings and to emphasise his anger.

  2. Comparing and Contrasting Poems

    strong feedback from the reader, which is exactly what the poem is doing. Another similarity between the poems is that when one reads the title, the poem is thought to be from primitive and quite exotic areas. The reason for this may be because scorpions are found in exotic countries

  1. Comparison between Dulce et Decorum Est & The Last Night

    taken its toll, the young men evolving -- or more appropriately, regressing -- into haggard and withered creatures that have faced acute pain and loss. However, the change in pace within the stanza is evident - when faced by death, we experience "an ecstasy of fumbling", and this change in

  2. comapring and contrasting pre 1940's poems

    placing 'officious fool' at the end of the line, Browning emphasises the Duke's distaste at referring to the man. This could also be thought of as a representation of his opinions on all his minions. He finds them irritating and will not have much to do with them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work