• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparing and Contrasting war poems

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast poems by a minimum of 3 war poets who present different views on war. You should refer to at least four poems in your answer. During the First World War there were many attitudes towards the war such as pro-war and anti-war. Many people who were all for the war showed great enthusiasm and many men were desperate for glory seeking to be a hero instead of the "One in the stand" as Jesse Pope wrote in her poem 'Who's For The Game?' The main reason for everyone being so open towards the war was the propaganda that was published by Pro-War poets and publishers. That got all the men thinking that if they didn't join the fight to help their country they would be marked cowards in the eyes of all. Another attitude towards war was Anti-War. Most people didn't turn against war until they were at the front line, in the trenches knee deep in mud, watching close friends die in front of their eyes, even sometimes causing some to commit suicide just to escape the horrors of war. Some of the soldiers such as Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon wrote poems to show and inform the people back at home, what the war was really about. Jessie Pope was one of those pro-war poets who composed crude recruitment poems for the Daily Mail. One of her most famous poems was 'Who's for the Game?' ...read more.

Middle

The terrible physical condition of the men is also illustrated with the line 'Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through the sludge.' The simile compares the soldiers' physical condition to that of witches, and creates the image of very old wrinkled women slowly stumbling through thick mud. The word 'trudge' is an onomatopoeia used to emphasize the fact that the pace is tremendously slow. It portrays the image that it takes a lot of effort for them to take every step. 'All went lame; all blind' emphasizes that the war affected everyone and the fact that Owen uses personification to describe the shells as 'tired', gives the impressions that he thinks that the war is pointless and had been occurring for too long. In the second stanza there is suddenly a big contrast and the mood instantly changes. The pace speeds up to a much faster, more panicky mood. 'Gas! GAS! Quick, boys!' is the first few words written in the second stanza. It immediately highlights the speed of this section and that everything is happening unexpectedly and urgently. The image created is that all the men are in 'an ecstasy of fumbling', unaware of their fate. The word 'ecstasy,' is ironic as it gives the impression of extreme joy, yet the opposite emotion would be expected. Owen uses this line to try and portray a gush of energy. 'Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time,' and words like 'stumbling' are used to create the image that the process is urgent, life threatening and dangerous. ...read more.

Conclusion

This stanza generates great sympathy as it is a tragic waste of life. Like Owen he shows the reality of war. In the third stanza, Sassoon directs the poem at 'You' in an accusatory fashion. The 'smug-faced' crowds have no real concept of what it means to fight in a war. Sassoon powerfully advises them to 'Sneak home and pray you'll never know/The hell where youth and laughter go'. Like Owen he scolds the people and poets, who cheered and encouraged the men to enlist. In conclusion, I feel that all 3 poets are just as effective in their writing, yet Jessie Pope presents very different pictures of war to that of Owen and Sassoon. Owen and Sassoon are excellent examples of poetry portraying the realism of war whereas Pope's poem is an excellent example of the unfortunate attitude of those people back at home, who had not experienced war at all. Jessie pope aimed her poems towards young men in general, with the aim of persuading them to enlist in the forces. Yet Owen and Sassoon aimed their poetry towards a different audience, they scolded the people that had not experienced war, making them feel guilty for once encouraging and sending so many innocent men to their death. All poets are very successful in portraying their aims and views of war. Each poem was just as convincing. In my opinion I believe that Sassoon's poem and use of language is the most effective as it explains the harsh realities of life at war and the fact that he informs his readers that the war did not only affected men physically but also psychologically creates great sympathy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Pre and Post 1914 Comparison section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Pre and Post 1914 Comparison essays

  1. How does Rupert Brooke uses language in order to convey a war patriotism?

    Every English soldier is protected and glorified by England beauty, and when they die they will find peace and comfort.

  2. A criticacl comparison of Siegfried sassoon 'attack' and jeff curtis 'argonne forest'

    'Flounders' is an important verb that conveys the futility of hope along with describing the fate of men. It's a very pessimistic word, it captures them thrashing around in death.

  1. Compare the viewpoint on war in Charge of the Light Brigade by Alfred ...

    is mentioned again as the survivors make their escape. The survivors of this battle are also seen as heroes overcoming the power of death. Stanza 6 When can their glory fade? O the wild charge they made! All the world wondered.

  2. analysis and comparison of two war poems

    However in 'Dulce et Decorum est' the horror is much more obvious. This is because Owen wanted to show life in trench warfare and how terrible it was though Tennyson wanted to make a point that someone had made a mistake and sent many soldiers to their death.

  1. Compare and contrast the ways in which Owen and Sassoon present images of suffering ...

    The use of the word 'sag' seems to indicate gloominess and almost apathy, as if the clouds could no longer care to hold themselves in shape. Even the enemy (which in this case is the start of a new day which has been personified)

  2. Compare and contrast the poems Strange Meeting, by Wilfred Owen and I Have A ...

    perhaps a soft and pure pity, as he joins 'pity' with 'distil'. If Strange Meeting was supposed to be a glorious poem, expressing the "wonder" of war, Owen would not have used words like 'pity' and 'distil', but perhaps words more like 'strong' and 'mighty' - this consequently implies that

  1. The two poems, Dulce et decorum est and Charge of the Light Brigade both ...

    form Wilfred Owens "Dulce et Decorum est", this is because of three reasons, firstly, Wilfred Owen is depicting World War One and trench warfare, and Alfred Lord Tennyson is describing the failure of the Charge of the Light Brigade. Reason two is that Wilfred Owen is anti-war, but Alfred Lord

  2. Comparison Essay between "Out-Out" and "Disabled" by Wilfred Owen and Robert Frost.

    This quick change in mood is very similar to the change in mood in ?Out-Out?. In ?Out-Out? Frost uses the phrase ?dark of ether?. This could mean many things, it could have its literal meaning because the boy is unconsciousness and therefore can not see anything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work