Comparing Poems

Authors Avatar

Rising Five and Mid-Term Break

Both Mid-term Break, by Seamus Heaney and Rising Five, by Norman Nicholson deal with the irreversible loss and wastage of life. Norman Nicholson in particular came very close to losing his own life as a young man. He expresses his deep regret over the manner people waste their life by rushing through it, in pursuit of future aspirations. This is unlike Mid-term Break, whose main theme is the incomprehensible loss of a young child and the contrasting reactions of all the family members involved.

The theme of Mid-term Break focuses around the grief and shock following the death of a very young sibling whose life was brutally ended and wasted by a car accident. On the other hand, the theme of Rising Five has a more broad application as it critiques a way of living that leads to a wasted life not so different from the case in Mid-term Break. In effect, Mid-term Break is rather one dimensional because it merely focuses on a single case of wasted life and does not attempt to consider moral or philosophical aspects of either life or death unlike Rising Five.

Join now!


Mid-term Break focuses on the tragic death of a four year old sibling and the reactions of the main character and other personalities involved. The sudden and brutal understanding of the death is expressed strongly with the last line, 'A four foot box, a foot for every year.' This line emphasizes the boy’s strong sentiment of helplessness and injustice in regard to his brother’s death with the significance of the phrase, 'a four foot box' and more noticeably, the separation of the line from the last paragraph. This is particularly effective because the poem is made up of three line ...

This is a preview of the whole essay