Comparing the ways in which tension and suspense is created in the opening sequences of David Lean's 1946 & Julian Jarrold's 1999 interpretation of "Great Expectations" by Charles Dickens.

Authors Avatar

Comparing the ways in which tension and suspense is created in the opening sequences of David Lean’s 1946 & Julian Jarrold’s 1999 interpretation of “Great Expectations” by Charles Dickens

In David Lean’s 1946 interpretation of “Great Expectation” Pip is portrayed as a small, smart, clean young boy, as he will be considered more innocent and vulnerable to the audience.  Pip’s fair hair colour against the darkening background makes the audience think that he is an angelic like figure.  Lean shows the vast landscape with tall-silhouetted gibbets to indicate just how small and vulnerable Pip is running across the marshland.  When Pip goes to visit and weed the grave of his parents, Lean shows this particularly to gain the audience’s sympathy.  The audience hears everything that Pip hears and this helps us to understand his apprehension.  The scream is shocking and makes us see his fear to his meeting with the convict.  When he is being threatened, Pip’s overwhelming politeness and naivety, despite the life-threatening situation he is in, makes the audience feel a great deal of sympathy for him.

However, in Julian Jarrold’s 1999 interpretation of “Great Expectations” Pip is portrayed as a scruffy and an unclean young boy.  This image gains the audience’s sympathy as we can tell that he is mistreated at home.  Jarrold’s Pip has dark hair; and although he is not seen as an angelic and innocent figure.  Jarrold engages the sympathy of the audience by presenting him as a hunted animal.  When Pip encounters the convict, he is undoubtedly terrified and traumatised.  He cannot even look at the convict, and is so paralysed with fear he can’t even speak.

When we first meet the convict we can see immediately how intimidating he can be.  David Lean shows a close-up of his face simultaneously to him jumping onto the scene.  This close-up view is being used to show us what the convict is thinking and also to show the anger.  This close-up view is also used to prevent us seeing what Pip is doing when the camera zooms up on the convict.  Therefore we worry for Pip and this adds to the suspense of the moment.  The convict is an intimidating large man who has a lot of power over Pip.  In the beginning he is always shot in darkness, whereas Pip is always shot in bright light to emphasise his innocence.  This is particularly noticeable when the convict is in control, trying to tilt Pip over the gravestone.  There is a cut between Pip and the convict to show Pip’s vulnerability and a close-up of his face highlights his terror.  Pip is shown as the opposite to the convict and looks innocent, charming and neatly dressed.  The convict however looks angry and dirty and we presume that this is what he is like and therefore regard him as a bad person.

Join now!

Language is also used to emphasise the convict’s aggressiveness.  The convict specifically emphasises the words ‘roasted’ and also ‘tear him open’.  These words are emphasised to scare Pip and also to shock the audience.  It draws the audience into the story and makes us feel Pip’s intimidation.  The convict’s terrifying image adds to the forbidding setting.

Julian Jarrold’s version of the convict is shown to be incredibly daunting and intimidating.  Although no dialogue is spoken we can see from his fixed stare on Pip and his angry scowl that he intends to do harm to him.  The convict is dressed ...

This is a preview of the whole essay