• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparison of Romeo and Juliet Oppening Scene

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the ways in which Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli present Scene 1 of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli portrayed the film 'Romeo and Juliet' in very different ways. Most of the scenes in the film are portrayed in different ways although there are some similarities. There are some very obvious differences including the intended audience, the setting, the place and the timing of the play. There are some smaller differences as well such as the use of music, camera angles, lighting, the way different people are introduced and many more. I think that in Luhrmann's version of the film the intended audience is a much younger audience, from teenagers to people in their mid 20's. I believe this because his version has much more action in it and is more modern which is more appealing to the younger generations than to the older generations. The audience intended for Zeffirelli's version, however, is most likely the older generation than the younger generations as it is quite slow moving and focuses only on the essentials of the story than to make the audience interested with the lack of action. The fact that the film was made in the 1960's makes it even more appealing to the older generations as it was made when they were young and so it is familiar as well as the fact that it is set in the times of when it was written. The settings in the two versions show the most difference and in Luhrmann's version it is more modern and so reflects life as we know it today. ...read more.

Middle

It is this introduction to the two families starting a fight that shows the problems already between them which will continue during the rest of the film. This is done very well with all the different types of music that are played and the way the camera moves quickly between showing each person and their reaction to the situation. The way that the camera zooms in on particular parts of people such as people's faces and feet is also a good technique as it gets a certain effect about the person which the director is trying to achieve. In the older film the director goes straight to the Montagues who are causing trouble but not in as much detail as the other film. In this version the Montagues also see the Capulets, which is seen from their point of view from afar showing an interesting use of the camera angle, and actually go to them looking for a fight. The Montagues are much braver in this version compared to Luhrmann's version where they were cowards in the other film and the Capulets aren't as sinister as in Luhrmann's due to the fact they are walking around with an old man which adds a gentleness to them. Zeffirelli doesn't really want music in this part of the film with just the use of background noise, which makes it easier for us to hear what is going on and what is being said in the film. It also allows us to pay more attention to their facial expressions rather than assume what they are like from the music being played. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Luhrmann's version we see him on the beach before a sunrise and in Zeffirelli's version we see him walking under a bridge and the soft music and the way the camera introduces him from afar creates a similar effect in both. The camera switches from far away to close up and so on until he reaches Benvolio and they then talk. The music has finally stopped at this point but soon starts again and gets louder as Romeo finds out about the fight increasing the drama. Interestingly, Romeo's introduction is the only part in the first scene where both directors have shown something the same. In my opinion, I think that both films have been successful in their own way but overall from my point of view and perhaps as a younger audience, I preferred Luhrmann's version. Zeffirelli has made a good version of the play with the way it is directed but I feel he was focusing more on telling the story of Romeo and Juliet rather than trying to get the audience interested into actually watching it and showing the range of emotions as to me it seemed quite dull and lifeless. Luhrmann's version attempted to make it exciting to the audience while still telling the story in a more interesting way. As I said earlier, Luhrmann's film is meant for the younger generations because of the action in it which would interest them, and Zeffirelli's version is meant for the older generations because of the way he has just focused on the story itself without adding action. Overall, both are very good and are alike in some ways but very different in other ways, so the favourite would depend on your personal taste. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. The problems faced by a modern director of

    or vice- versa. How Baz Luhrman solved problems First of all Baz Luhrman needed a modern setting to make the plot and the characters work. He chose Verona Beach city as his setting of the play and this really worked because the real play was set in Verona.

  2. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    Also the forensics brings in a sense of suspicion and distrust. Whereas in the Franco Zeffirelli you first hear screams and shouts, which show devastation and the fact that, the Nurse did actually care about Juliet. When Romeo finds out about the news, he is told in the misty red sunset which Is symbolic of death.

  1. How effectively do Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli interpret Act I Scene VI when ...

    Baz Luhrmann's version uses a modern set but the old text, this makes the film less realistic because we do not speak like the text is written. Both films try to help the audience understand the text by using camera shots.

  2. Choose two scenes from "Romeo and Juliet" and comment on how Zeffirelli and Luhrmann ...

    also helps the audience to quickly identify which characters are on which side. The audience can then pay more attention to the dialogue and visual images without worrying about learning characters. This allows Zeffirelli to not include some text from the original play that dealt mainly with character introduction.

  1. Consider how the dramatist's work is developed, modified and enhanced by the Zeffirelli and ...

    In the time of Shakespeare's writing, prose represented the lesser form as poetry was a superior style or scripture. And so it would have implied the aura of lesser characters: sexual innuendo and crude violence then infiltrates to demonstrate these traits.

  2. Compare & Contrast The Ways In Which, 'Baz Luhrmann' & 'Franco Zeffirelli' Present Scene ...

    The prologue of Baz Luhrmann's shot reveals the entire screen to be covered in pitch black and totally blank. Then from the centre of the screen moving at a steady speed a television screen moves closer to the audience. Once it is in focus it can be seen that there

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work