• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparison of The Crucible and After Liverpool.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Comparison of The Crucible and After Liverpool For this assignment I am going to be comparing two plays both of which I have studied and preformed. The first play, which I studied, was the crucible by Arthur Miller and After Liverpool by James Saunders. Each of the two plays are naturalistic but are set in two very different times. The Crucible is set in Salem Massachusetts in 1642 and After Liverpool is set in the 70's. The two are quite contrary in how they were set out first of all After Liverpool was made up of 23 small scenes some only having a few lines some having quite a few but most of them were short. The main things used in the setting for each scene are very basic. The scene was made up of a coffee table, a few chairs and a sofa. It os so basic as everyone has these things and this type of thing could happen to anyone of us at any time. ...read more.

Middle

The crucible has many different characters and each of the characters are described and are of quite significance. Compared to After Liverpool where there is no description of the characters. There is no description of characters as it is irrelevant of who you are in this piece as all people are involved or could be involved in a relationship. The crucible is based on a true story and some of the characters were real people. The crucible is an allegory and was written as Arthur Miller wanted to express his views but couldn't so he uses The Crucible as an allegory to do so. Miller wanted to express his views about the McCarthy communist hunts in America. What he was saying was that if America is so great and believes in freedom why is it that you were killed or exiled for believing in a contrary government to Americas own. ...read more.

Conclusion

The fact After Liverpool is written like this is also symbolic in that everyone can be in a relationship that is why the characters are labelled M and W. The reason they are labelled M and W is that it can represent anyone, which is rue as anyone can be in a relationship. The scenes did not have to be in any order this is also symbolic that the relationships in the play do not get anywhere they always end up asking the same questions. They had no specific chronological order as everything was happening in the present. Having looked at both plays it has given me an insight of two very effective ways of portraying relationships both of them very different from each other. I preferred performing After Liverpool as I could use my own drama skills to play each character, which I think is a lot better, and I enjoyed it more. Also I found it easier to understand, as it used more modern language, which was easier to learn. Daniel Cutts 11N ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. How successful is The Crucible as an allegory?

    We burn a hot fire here; it melts down all concealment. In Miller's lecture about The Crucible Miller says: The Crucible straddles two very different worlds to make them one, but in the

  2. The Crucible's Relevance to today's Society

    So now there is a witch-hunt in progress. This is similar to the events of 'The Crucible', as there was no evidence of Witchcraft by the accused. Just the dilutions of Abagail and her friends. An example of this is when they pretend that Mary Warren is controlling them and then turns in to bird and attacks them.

  1. In this assignment I am going to investigate the dramatic Intensity of The Crucible's ...

    The whole community is generally dynamic because they change from being good to each other to spiteful and horrible towards each other. Now I am going to discuss the development of the play and how Arthur miller lets the plat unfold gradually, therefore building tension.

  2. The crucible.

    This is the start of the others doing the same and lying to save them self's miller does this to show how the people who have no morale and are weak are easily pressured into admitting and passing the blame.

  1. The Crucible.

    The audience condemns Putnam for this and thus rejects the greed evident in the upper-middle classes. The Crucible, by demonstrating the flaws in the hierarchical nature of society reveal ensuing social and moral problems to the audience. Miller problematises religious extremism and religious corruption in his drama The Crucible and explores its causes and consequences throughout the play.

  2. The Crucible - summary.

    Finally Abigail blames Tituba, claiming that Tituba made her and Betty drink chicken blood. Abigail says that Tituba sends her spirit on her in church and makes her laugh at prayer. Putnam declares that Tituba must be hanged. Hale confronts Tituba.

  1. Essay on 'The Crucible'

    He's a good-hearted man who wants to make his wrongs right. An honourable man, who stands up for what is right and uses his wisdom against that which is wrong. Abigail, a very cunning young woman, she has committed adultery with John Proctor and uses this to her advantage by blackmailing and threatening him.

  2. The Crucible

    Tension is caused by him not confessing or accusing someone else of witchery consequently encountering a slow and painful death. Forced to plead guilty by pressing heavy stones on his chest he died by being crushed under the weight of these many stones .A slow painful death made it aching

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work