Consider The Criticism That The Glass Menagerie Is A 'Clever Juxtaposition Of Scenes Rather Than A Unified Play'.

Authors Avatar

Consider The Criticism That The Glass Menagerie Is A ‘Clever Juxtaposition Of Scenes Rather Than A Unified Play’

∙ Structure Of The Play

∙ Chronological Development

∙ Static Nature

∙ Possibilities As A Memory Play

∙ In Terms Of A Unifying Elements:

        -Set

        -Motifs Of Father And Gentleman Caller

        The Glass Menagerie is often criticised as a juxtaposition, or arrangement of scenes, rather than being a traditional unified play. I believe this criticism is a correct one for many reasons. A major reason which fuels this criticism is the lack of acts. In Shakespearian plays there are traditionally 5 acts, with the play being divided into roughly two halves, the build up of problems and then the solving of these problems. More modern plays usually have 3 acts, which nicely divides the play into three parts, the build up of problems, the climax, and the solution of problems. This play, however has no acts, so has no solid structure as such. It is just an arrangement of seven scenes.

Join now!

        I believe this was intentional by Tennessee Williams, I believe the structure of the play is symbolic of the structure of the family, it has no real structure and is just an arrangement of people, or if you like, a menagerie. Right from the start in the opening speech of Tom, we are told that the play is a memory play. This gives the impression that it will not be an exact account of the events, rather an arrangement of memories that are often disjointed. As we read the play we can see that it jumps around in time, one ...

This is a preview of the whole essay