• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the relationship between the two characters, John and the female speaker in the passage from Charlotte Perkins Gilman's short story 'The Yellow Wallpaper.' Why do you suppose the speaker feels that she 'must' write what she thinks and feels?

Extracts from this document...


Consider the relationship between the two characters, John and the female speaker in the passage from Charlotte Perkins Gilman's short story 'The Yellow Wallpaper.' Why do you suppose the speaker feels that she 'must' write what she thinks and feels? What does writing mean to her? Why would John think her writing 'absurd'? Is this merely an account of a woman going crazy or is Gilman offering us 'social protest' here? What evidence do we have that the speaker is unstable? What aspects of life in late 19th Century America might the author be protesting against? The very fact that the speaker feels the need to write down and not articulate her feelings of unease arouses the reader's suspicion that the relationship between her husband and herself is not as sound as it should be. Even on first reading there appears to be a distinct lack of understanding between the couple, for the speaker states, "I know John would think it absurd," implying that he would not be able to see the situation from her perspective. The speaker's declaration that she 'must' write further enforces the idea that she is not understand, for her need reveals the true extent of her entrapment and desperation, exposed through her strong choice of language. Although he does not directly speak, through the speaker's portrayal of him, the reader can assume that he had undertaken a very patronising attitude in dealing with his wife's illness. ...read more.


In this respect, the colour of the wallpaper could be seen to reflect her mood. Her statement, "It is such a relief," is considered by John to be absurd, portraying the complete lack of communication the couple share. The idea that the narrator feels repressed continues when she states, "of course I never mention it to them anymore," revealing her inability to share her thoughts with someone that is supposedly dear to her. Therefore, John's inability to listen to her thoughts further adds to his overall governing of her, for she feels belittled by his disapproval and lack of understanding. Treated like this, it is no wonder that the narrator finds it difficult to stand alone as an independent woman, for her husband treats her as though she her opinions and perceptions are of little importance. The reader can assume that this occurred even before her illness. The way in which the speaker is being denied her basic human rights and secured in her room, causes the reader to wonder whether she is being forced into such a state by her husband or her frustration provoked by her lack of freedom. The passage appears to contain various contradictions, primarily in the narrator's opinions towards her husband John. She initially begins by calling "dear John" and placing her up-most faith is his advice. ...read more.


Set in the late 19th century, when women had not yet acquired the vote, the feminist movement had just begun its quest to force people to acknowledge women as first class citizens. It can be seen however, that in some respects, the speaker's deterioration into her poor mental state does provider her with some form of release, and therefore ironically, she is ultimately victorious in escaping her husband's control by giving in to her illness. The piece contains a vast amount of punctuation marks, and consists of fairly short sentences providing the reader with the impression that it is a stream of consciousness she is writing down and not a planned series of thoughts. If this is so, then these may be her feelings at that present moment, and not as earnest as the reader assumes, a consequence of what her husband says is an illness. The sentences flow more fluently when she talks about seeing her cousin, her thoughts become more organised when the subject moves onto something unrelated for in one moment she can forget her current situation and focus on a more positive issue. Despite this, John takes pains to remove her optimism, making almost cruelly sure that the speaker understands there is little point imagining such a outing, for she will not be able. His brutal reality serves only to enforce the former idea that he is fulfilling his traditional masculine role in dictating what his wife can and cannot do. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aldous Huxley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aldous Huxley essays

  1. How have John Pilger and Tony Parsons used language to persuade the reader to ...

    With parsons only mentioning negative things about the beggars he just shows us the bad side of the beggars and builds on that until he convinced us that they are bad top to bottom. With directly opposite views, Pilger portrays the beggars as being victims.

  2. Throughout The Crucible the visual effects of the play indicate a lot about the ...

    However John is strongly opposed to the idea. He knows why Abby is accusing Elizabeth, in order to get to him. John now knows that he needs to prove to the courts that the girls are only pretending to see spirits, and that all the accused are in fact innocent and the girls are the guilty ones.

  1. Analysis of John

    We briefly hear the speaker in the background say what he is about to do, "a running bomb." Peter Kay throws himself off the platform, making the water splash everywhere, even over the judges. The commentator then says, "oh terrific the crowd love it, and so do the judges!"

  2. How do the authors of two texts you have studied express the reasons for ...

    surprising," similar to Zamyatin's depiction of controlled names in order to promote collectivism. Such an idea is emphasised when we are introduced to Bernard Marx whose physical imperfections immediately link him to revolution not only to the reader, but also other characters.

  1. Investigating John Calvin, the founder of the Calvinist faith.

    Calvin's wife died in 1549 and he never remarried. Calvin developed a constitution for Geneva with dealt with both secular and sacred matters. He also pushed for the development of a municipal school system for all children. In 1559 Calvin open! ed the Geneva Academy as the center of instruction for the best students.

  2. Essay on Conflicts in two short stories: "The Quartet" and "The Snob"

    all three in the bedroom, sharing stories and ideas, projecting the love of a mother and a father: " Every night when John came home, whether it was early or late, he used to go into his father's and mother's bedroom and turn on the light and talk to them

  1. Original writting... A Horror story... Julie's worst nightmare.

    Julie's mother was very angry. She told Julie that she never can skip school again.

  2. What is the John Lewis Partnership?

    Thirdly, 40% of the interviewees go to John Lewis because there are a large variety of products for them to choose, 23% of the interviewees go to John Lewis because it has a good reputation, 20% of them say that the customers services are good and 17% of them go to John Lewis due to its good availability in location.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work