• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Coursework B Animal Testing

Extracts from this document...


Coursework B animal testing In my essay I will be writing to tell about why people should and shouldn't agree to animal testing, I will be telling both sides of to animal testing from sources and both views. Animal testing is experiments on animals to benefit human beings, there are three reasons for animal experiments one is cosmetic, this is for beauty for example lipstick, make up etc. Second is cleaning products for example bleaching products, washing up liquid and more, and the last reason is for medical research this is to cure diseases and human health problems. Animal testing is topical and debatable because there are two groups who agree very strongly with there views, reasons and policy for there group and in my opinion the two different sides are arrogant and strongly disagree with there opposition they just ignore the points and just stick to what they believe. In article one Andrew Blake who is for animal testing and a member of the HLS (Huntingdon Life Sciences) argues that his company which is the U.K's largest contract research organisation carry out animal testing and they help to develop safety tests for human medicine. ...read more.


In article two Sarah Kite explains why she thinks animal testing is unethical and why it's wrong. She says that BUAV (British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection) is peaceful and oppose violence to humans and animals; this tells us that they are not terrorist. Sarah Kite then argues and turns the violence around on the animal research saying that they commit violent offences to millions of animal laboratory every year; she quickly blames it on the opposition in the article. She then explains the facts about what the HLS actually do, for example 'It conducts toxicity tests on animals...' she then explains the cruelty to animals 'These range from being dripped into the animals eyes, injected into the bodies, forced up their nostrils or forced down their throats.' This shows us the inhuman behaviour of these scientists. So she exposes the truth of the suffering of the animals. HLS does it to check for any side affects and other poisoning symptoms such as 'vomiting, diarrhoea, bleeding and fits.' These animals suffer badly for us humans which is cruel, she makes us think about the suffering animal and says is it really worth it? ...read more.


I think yes in order to prevent suffering for a human's life. Animal testing benefits us so why not do it? We kill animals for food so why can't we use them for health purposes. It may cure someone of a life mattering disease it could affect someone we love so that's why I am for animal testing. Even though animals has feelings and suffer I think that a human life is more significant in life than an animal so therefore we should find a way to survive and live of the expense of an animal's suffering. Animal experiments and research based on them helped us already with a number of medicines for example; insulin to help control diabetes is made from animals also children's immunizations were created with the work of animal testing and woman who take progesterone to prevent miscarriages, these are used from research on animals as well. But on the other hand I think that animal testing is cruel and cold-hearted because it is just spiteful to hurt animals to the top and to kill them after they have been used it's just not right. I would want the animal to have the minimum amount of suffering. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Animal testing

    than that of a human, which is a strong point to make and is felt as completely wrong by many animal lovers as they feel animals have as much right to life as that of a human. An example of this to them is that no new drug would first

  2. Should animal testing be banned?

    Only one of these statements can possibly be true, and I believe it is the latter for which we should stand for. Also, I believe that we are not more intelligent than animals; we may be in the sense that we can develop cures for disease, and invent things to make our lives much easier.

  1. Animal Testing

    Small animals, such as rats, are used to determine the side effects of new drugs. After animal tests have proven the safety of new drugs, patients asked to participate in further studies can be assured that they may fare better, and will not do worse than if they were given standard treatment or no treatment.

  2. Arguments for and against Animal testing. I disagree with K. Archibalds opinion of banning ...

    In addition, K. Archibald is calling to test new drugs on people rather than animals. I think it would be heartless to test new drugs on people and if we test new drugs on people, it will take longer to see any effects.

  1. Huckleberry Finn Coursework

    Huck would struggle as the poem would not be in reality. Although, Huck could believe that Emmeline is a fake; a spirit sent from somewhere above. How can someone be so into death and morbid artistic items and still be human?

  2. Supersize me coursework

    Furthermore, we are entertained by popular music. The music fits incredibly within the film and makes it appealing. As well as the director Morgan Spurlock sang songs to add emotional effects. One more technique that worked well with the movie was photo montage. All the photos are exposed at once, rather than showing the photos one by one which would get lacklustre.

  1. Advertising coursework (McDonalds)

    Although the toys are only suitable for children over three, McDonalds have not missed the opportunity to make as much money as possible. They achieve this by providing an alternative for children under three. From this we can conclude that McDonalds do not mind serving a happy meal (cheeseburger, fries and a coke)

  2. Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing

    This test is intensely painful for the animal, and blindness, scarring, and death are generally the end results. The Draize test has been criticized for being unreliable and a needless waste of animal life. The LD50 test is used to test the dosage of a substance that is necessary to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work