Creature or monster? How does Shelley's presentation of the creature (and Frankenstein) create sympathy or horror at different stages of the novel?

Authors Avatar

Creature or monster? How does Shelley’s presentation of the creature (and Frankenstein) create sympathy or horror at different stages of the novel?

The classic novel ‘Frankenstein’ was published in 1818 and was written by Mary Shelley. When the book was written in the 18th Century there great supernatural beliefs which Shelley used to influence the mood, tone and characters of the story.

    Shelley had the idea to write about a monstrous creation that was gentle and tender hearted, but was physically ugly and inspired fear into those who met him. Shelley wrote the story to challenge society and question their views of morality.

    The stereotypical idea that a monster is a hideous, deformed creature that appears in horror films and nightmares is only thought of as the creature generally acts and behaves monstrously, doing harmful actions with no consideration or feelings. It is often only the behaviour of the creature that defines it as a monster rather than its physical appearance.

    The idea of a student of natural philosophy creating a living being would be as well received today as it was back in the 18th Century. In the 18th Century people feared God and believed that life and death was best left to a higher force to control. Shelley shows this in Frankenstein’s realisation of his mistake, when he has finished assembling the creature out of dead criminals.

     Although repeatedly in the novel Frankenstein calls his creation a monster, it is he who is the real monster when he claims to have created life to defeat death but it is clear that his motives were largely selfish, as he states: “I was surprised that among so many men of genius… that I alone should be reserved to discover so astonishing a secret.” He creates the living being from the rotten flesh of buried convicts, which suggests that the creature would be evil stitched to evil, but the outcome of the novel suggests otherwise. Frankenstein doesn’t acknowledge that this grisly of its creation and physical form might repel others as much as it does him.

Join now!

    When Frankenstein abandons the creature and it escapes, it is out of disgust for its physical repulsiveness; he never stops to consider the creature’s emotions or how it will survive by itself. By doing this Frankenstein condemns the creature to a life of loneliness and hatred. The creature’s violent acts are not an inherent part of his character as he explains, “I was benevolent and good: misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous.”

    Frankenstein knew that he would have to deal with the consequences of what his creation might ...

This is a preview of the whole essay