• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Crucible confession

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'In what ways does Miller succeed in making the moment when Proctor tears up his confession particularly dramatic?' The Crucible is a play about the mass hysteria and persecution, which eventually led to the tragic Salem witch trials in 1692. It was written by Arthur Miller in 1953 and was performed all over America in the 1950's. It was set in the late 17th Century and follows the life of a farmer falsely accused of witchcraft. The tragic drama was set in Salem at the time of the famous witch trials and gives the audience an insight as to a possible story that may have occurred. The play shows how a calm, farming community can be rocked by fear and paranoia of the devil. The play leads the audience through a time period of around 3 months; starting with the first accusations made by troubled youths, through the trials of those accused and finally concludes with the false execution of a hero, broken down and built up again through the play. When the play was first released and performed in 1952 it was not accepted by society. This is because many of the people that became aware of the play and its themes related it to the communist trials of the time. The communist trials were trials of those thought to be supporting the expanding communist community in the 1940's and 1950's. People were called upon to name those they believed to be communist in front of a court. This had remarkable similarities to claims made by the youths in 'The Crucible.' People associated supporting Arthur Millers play to supporting the communist nation. However the play is now accepted as being one of the greatest English plays ever written. This is because now people do not see communism as such a major threat. The theme of fear even has relevance to today. People of today are scared of the growing power of China, especially the USA. ...read more.

Middle

The hearing is very biased and the judge seems convinced in his verdict from the beginning giving the impression that the court hearing is simply for show and that it is realistically impossible for the ruling to be in favour of the defendant. This makes the audience worry that Elizabeth will have an unfair trial and she will hang for her 'sins.' We see the first accusation made in the scene quite early on. It is made from Judge Hathorne to Martha Corey (the defendant) 'I am innocent to a witch. I know not what a witch is.' 'How do you know then, that you are not a witch?' Here we see how a witch is prosecuted, this makes us think of fragile Elizabeth and wonder of how she will cope under the strain of court. Here we also see the power used by Hathorne. He uses accusations to make him seem in control and that he holds the power. Proctor and his friend storm into the court and the judge sends them out but then goes to talk to them for disturbing his courtroom. Proctor tries to use Mary Warren's confession to lying to the court to free Elizabeth but soon realises that the only chance of saving his wife's life is to prove that Abigail is lying. The only way he can do this is by proving that she has a reason for wanting Elizabeth dead, to take her place. Proctor confesses to lechery and Danforth says that if Elizabeth will confirm that Abigail and Proctor had an affair he will let all the accused go free. This will prove that Abigail had an evil aim that she was trying to accomplish by accusing women of witchcraft. Elizabeth is brought in and Miller makes this part of the play a semi-climax. There is a lot of tension because the audience are pleading for Elizabeth to claim lechery on John, knowing that it is one of the Ten Commandments. ...read more.

Conclusion

Proctor is seen as a hero and martyr at this point in the play. This shows how Miller made the tearing of the confession dramatic. Miller built up tension throughout the play that resulted in the confession being dramatic in some respects exhausting. Miller used clear and lengthy stage directions to show how characters reacted to one another. These stage directions were often very descriptive which means that an actor performing the play could express Millers exact interpretations. This means that the audience could predict (whether they were reading or watching the play) how each character would react to the tearing of the confession. However most characters did not follow their expected routes. For example Parris was in hysteria and though the audience had seen him in panic in Act 1 he was never concerned of Proctor's life and business. At this point he seemed to be the most affected. This shows us how Miller used stage directions to create bonds, which would be broken at the tearing of the confession, between the audience and characters. Finally the ending of the play still seems very dramatic even though it was written over 50 years ago. This is because the play was based on fear growing into paranoia in a community. This theme can be related to any time period such as communism in the 1950's. It can even be related into the society of today (possibly with the growing fear of the power in china) which is why I believe that the play is still so popular and why it is still seen as a huge tragedy; people can relate to it. People could relate to it in the 1950's when it was written because of the conflicts with Russia and communism and people can relate to it now with the threat of China's growing power. People in society will always have fears, therefore the play will always have some relevance no matter which time era it is being read / performed in. Tarryn Christison 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is John Proctor a good man?

    4 star(s)

    This shows how he has lied to her about Abigail again as he already did lie about her before when they were in the affair. This shows that proctor must be a very untrustworthy, sneaky man as this is how he treats his own wife.

  2. "John Proctor is the tragic hero of The Crucible". How far would you agree ...

    Proctor lists nine and is reminded by Elizabeth "you forgot adultery John, adultery." Adultery committed by John Proctor is definitely a point against his imagery as a hero. All the facts that he has an affair with Abigail, then lies to the court and leaves his family behind are controversial to the heroic figure.

  1. How does John Proctor change throughout the play? Does Act Four show him as ...

    This bravery is crucial to enable the audience to build up a relationship with Proctor that will allow the audience to connect with him towards the end of the play when he chooses to die as a martyr. The text at this point frequently uses religious symbolism so that Proctor will appear in the same light as Jesus perhaps did.

  2. Elia Kazan's film On the Waterfront and Arthur Miller's play The Crucible tell similar ...

    Proctor decides not to confess. Thus, there are some basic similarities between the these stories: in each story, both are confronted to confess their sins for the better of the people and each man has to face certain consequences that come with their confession.

  1. Do you consider John Proctor to be a modern tragic hero?

    right and courage to act, despite the risks on his own reputation. In his actions toward Elizabeth, we see he is loyal and caring. Even though he strayed from his vows, he seeks forgiveness more than anything else and puts off Abigail's advances, "I will cut off my hand before I reach for you again."

  2. How and why does Arthur Miller encourage audience sympathy for John Proctor

    this way, and he can't expect her not to, as it was his wrong doing that is causing her to behave in this manner.

  1. The Crucible - Act 1 – Abigail Diary.

    He would realise that this is all Abigail's fault. She's the most scheming, vindictive person I have ever met. Whatever did John see in her? Now I'm being charged for witchcraft all because of my husbands lust for an eager ready to give everything child.

  2. Using both Act 2 and Act 4, explore the relationship between John and Elizabeth. ...

    "I am not used to this poverty; I left a thrifty business to serve the lord" "Don't a minister deserve a house to live in". Parris' greed is juxtaposed against the tenth commandment "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house; you shall not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his male

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work