• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Danielle Scarvaglieri

Extracts from this document...


Danielle Scarvaglieri Compare & contrast the love relationships in 1984 and The Handmaid's Tale Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale and George Orwell's 1984 are pieces of dystopian literature which embody repressive regimes and governments that rule through oppression and state controlled technology. One would think that love could not possibly be incorporated into such novels. Its antithesis, hate is understandably weaved in and expected, given the genre. However, in 1984 and The Handmaid's Tale, two totalitarian stories, the authors have given their protagonists a love interest. It plays both a pivotal and underlying role. There appears many ways in which Atwood and Orwell have approached the love relationships. Both protagonists are highly suspicious of their prospective love interests. Nick and Julia have been introduced in the two novels by chapter four to some degree, the early introduction highlighting their significance as characters. The level on uncertainty is shown through Offred considering Nick to be fishy and Winston not doubting that Julia was spying on him. Both also play with the idea that they might be government agents, and these sentiments as very ironic as one comes to realise that they form relationships, of which a fundamental aspects is trust. The idea of this is to highlight the societies they live in. ...read more.


Compared to the manipulation of language we see throughout the novel, it emphasises the fact that not everything can be changed easily, be it language or feelings. The ways in which both affairs rebel against their respective systems are crucially different. In The Handmaid's Tale, Offred's situation pushed her towards Nick because she years to be touched by someone, to be felt so greedily. One can tell of the sexual frustration caused by the Gilead regime as Atwood saturates the scene where Offred is for the first time touched by Nick with the tension felt by them both. Using the present tense, short sharp sentences and Offred's intrinsic dialogue diverged by brief verbal exchanges between them both. To live in a society so devoid in love is the catalyst for her affair, as she considers the parodic ceremony with the Commander to be fucking, with no affection or tenderness, just like what one sees in 1984 with everyone's duty to the party. So in essence anything that goes beyond sex for procreation is illegal in the eyes of both Gilead and Oceania. Unlike Offred, Winston is desperate to love but to fulfil his needs sexually; the primary reason that drove him into the relationship in the first place, also Winston's frustration is the reason for his misogynistic feelings, and the motive behind his rebellion. ...read more.


However, she notes he seems indifferent to what she has to say, which includes her real name, implying a strong trust in him, considering him an idol. Perhaps the way he watches her when she talks is what wins us round to thinking he is interested in her, in what she has to say, that he listens thus showing he does truly care. But the lack of information leaves us with little to compare him with Offred, especially when one notes that their love making is more suggestive than explicit, as no real detail at all is given, therefore Nick remains a mysterious figure. He gives her an identity, and for a brief time she experiences something real, just as Julia has done for Winston in 1984. To conclude, the parallels and the dissimilarities are apparent throughout both the books. Both Winston and Julia, and Offred and Nick were two separate quantities thrown together with suspicion and chance. Both couples were suppressed in regimes where they had no extrinsic control, but together sought hope from each other in order to maintain a level of sanity whilst living in testing conditions assessing their degree of trust in one another. Yet through the use of narration, imagery and language we pick up the major and sometimes subtle differences in these two different, yet significantly similar relationships; how they as people are so alike yet incongruent at the same time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE 1984 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE 1984 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How is Orwell's attitude towards totalitarianism personified through the characters of Winston and O'Brian ...

    4 star(s)

    "Withers, however, was already an unperson. He did not exist; he had never existed" (Orwell 1949 p. 46). (Orwell 1949 p. 53). "The proles are not human beings" (Orwell 1949 p.53). "Orthodoxy means not thinking-not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" (Orwell 1949 p. 54). "As he watched the eyeless face with the jaw moving rapidly

  2. Comparison of Offred and Winston in 1984 and The Handmaid's Tale

    Like Big Brother in 1984, reassuring sounding figures controls the characters, to lull the characters into false senses of security whilst exercising draconian rule. The connotations of matriarchy add a different dimension to interpreting both novels. Unlike 1984, Offred's bedroom is designed to prevent the Handmaid's committing suicide rather than

  1. Comparing Texts: 'Nineteen Eighty Four' & 'The Handmaid's Tale' How do Orwell and Atwood ...

    Even though it has no significance to her successive rebellion, to the reader it does have significance, as it is a realisation that Offred is capable of understanding such prohibitions on literacy. For both protagonists, there is a definitive extent to their freedom in the end, concurring realistically with the society.

  2. In the handmaids tale and 1984, compare their use of the dystopian genre.

    The main reason for winstons rebelion and eventual down fall is his imense sense of fatalism. He is intensly paranoid about the party and his belief that the party will eventualy capture him and punish him. "whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference.

  1. 1984 by George Orwell - summary

    over with instead of face the horrors that he may be subjected to. Work colleagues of Winstons were sent in the roomand they were all taken away to Room 101. which is the torture room. One of his work colleague's was dobbed in by his 7 year-old daughter for a Thought Crime that she heard him say in his sleep.

  2. "Compare the ways in which each author uses language and structure in their dystopian views of ...

    This is the complete opposite to proverbs of biblical allusions because Atwood's proverbs are of peace, this is why Oceania reconstructs the dictionary, as we know it in today's society. A similarity that the novels contain within their characters is their euphemisms of positive connotations.

  1. George Orwell and Margaret Atwood

    This form of control brainwashes its members into thinking along the same lines as the Party. It is very effective and helps the Party sustain their control. The tight scrutiny the Party places on the media can be paralleled in Margaret Attwood's The Handmaid's Tale.

  2. A key feature of a dystopian literature, such as "1984" and "Hunger Games" is ...

    Orwell creates a picture of a society that is influenced by the government through Winston diary. The word ?hope? indicates that something virtuous may happen and this would cause the readers to believe that Winston rebellious tactic of writing in his diary would be the spark that saves Oceania.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work