• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Diagnostic essay on 'Waterloo' by Raymond Garlick

Extracts from this document...


Charlotte Joyce Diagnostic essay on 'Waterloo' by Raymond Garlick Raymond Garlick sets his poem 'Waterloo' through a frank and subtly persuasive narrative. The poem allows the reader to explore Garlick's viewpoint on a homage to The Battle of Waterloo and war scenarios and to view them from a perspective that could be considered to have a contemporary and ironic viewpoint. In order to be able to gain a greater understanding from this poem, it is important to take note of the historical context of the poem. From the outset, the subject of 'Waterloo' is directly addressed, through the immediate introduction of the rhetorical statement "Waterloo?...". This has the effect of inviting the reader, subconsciously evoking a response from them to its one-word question. The title of the poem does this to more immediate effect, but the use of a rhetorical question in the first line grabs the attention of the reader, whilst also tackling the main subject straight away. The style of the poem is narrative, conversational, whilst raising questions about the value of war in the reader's mind at the same time, (in this case, the Battle of waterloo). ...read more.


A sub-theme which could also be extracted, is the exploitation of the Battle of Waterloo for financial gain (the speaker lays the blame at the feet of the growing "royal Belgian / Tourist industry"). This is implied in an indirect way; the poet makes the reader aware that the poet is concerned that this is a problem that needs to be addressed through the insertion of the phrase "..it would appear" on the last line of the last stanza. The "China Wellington boots" (miniature reproductions of Napoleon's boots) and "Napoelons" at the beginning of the fourth stanza strikes a chord with the reader; the souvenirs and memorabilia tourists buy, 'cheapen' and degenerate the effect and historical significance that the Battle is supposed to have. This is an important point that the speaker makes, further realised by that statement that it was "what Waterloo was for", ironically, clearly not what Waterloo was for. It is clear whilst reading through the poem, that certain key phrases stand out, such as "A pyramidal man-made hill"; this phrase seems a good example of the strong imagery that the poem evokes in the reader's mind. "That other violent race" (referring to the English). ...read more.


assuming the readers have prior knowledge of the main facts about the Battle (for example, the "prince of Orange" is not explicitly explained), but this is also another example of the clear outlining of the speaker's attitudes and values of those involved in the Battle. It is also important to note the change in the readers' response as the poem is read through. At the beginning, the tone changes from (what could be perceived as), a perfectly innocent recounting of the events of Waterloo and its historical context, to the stinging punchline of the final stanza with it's ironic and cynical tone, which emotionally involves the reader to be concerned about what the "royal Belgian / Tourist industry" is doing to the significance of the Battle. In conclusion, we see that Garlick's ability to engage the reader in a 'soft sell' narrative, by the use of strong imagery, cynicism and irony, has a powerful and thought provoking effect on us as readers. Therefore, this proves literary devices such as these have a big impact on the way different individuals interpret 'Waterloo' from their own perspective and also the importance of understanding and acknowledging the historical background of the poem, in order to interpret the message the poem tries to bring across. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Comparing Poems "Eve of Waterloo"

    3 star(s)

    He smiles to hide his fear. The last line of the stanza describes Brunswick dying in the battlefield. The stanza also personalises and that gives variation in the poem, which focuses more on the two armies than individuals. It describes the scene very well with verbs like "fated", "bloody" and "rushed".

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    This poster fails to mention the death and makes the battle out to be a 'clean fight' and doesn't portray the true reality of war. The failure to mention such factors as the radar system makes it rather unreliable. The Daily Express constantly fed news to the civilian population as well as asking for more recruits within the articles published.

  1. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    Churchill is trying to boost morale by saying, "We will win" and "We will save the world from the Nazis" By saying this it makes the public feel confident that Britain would be victorious and also it makes the jobs of the Military especially the R.A.F.

  2. Battle Royal.

    The white men planned the narrator's participation in the brawl before he even arrived at the hotel. The narrator partakes in one of the most barbaric events imaginable in our society. Up to this point, Ellison portrays his main character as an urbane yet na�ve intellectual.

  1. Battle Royal

    The white men view all of them equally; therefore they share the same elevator. Ellison further supplements the friction between the author and the other fighters by the repetition of I, and them. When the subject is housing, we, is used because the white men saw no difference within the group.

  2. The Crimean War.

    At the time, obviously the British thought themselves 'lucky' not to have been wiped out at Balaclava, and Even modern historians, like Trevor Royle share this same view. Within the first hour after an unequal shooting slog between the Russians and the Turks, the Turkish resistance crumbled, and left the British alone on the battlefield.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work