• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Baz Luhrmann's depiction of the characters in the opening scene of the 1996 film version of Romeo and Juliet. As a director, how would you have portrayed the same characters on Shakespeare's stage?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

English Coursework: Discuss Baz Luhrmann's depiction of the characters in the opening scene of the 1996 film version of Romeo and Juliet. As a director, how would you have portrayed the same characters on Shakespeare's stage? In the opening of the play, we are introduced to various characters of both houses; the Capulets and Montagues. We immediately sense the family feud when we see how the boys from each house are fighting with the boys from the opposite house. Both the Capulet and Montague boys are seen in the first scene to use bawdy humour, and this scene is all about machismo and agression. We sense that the boys of both houses are full of bravado and strutting bravery. There is a lot of sexual innuendo, along with punning and word play. The boys' sense of humour is based on low, simple, crude jokes, which are very unsophisticated. This was possibly due to the low status of the audience who watched this play being performed during the Shakesperean era. Furthermore, there is an implication that the Capulet and Montague boys are oozing testosterone in the very primitive idea of male domination, and how each male wants to have his enemy's female. For example, Samson, who is from the house of Capulet, describes "I will push Montague's men from the wall, and thrust his maids to the wall." Moreover, it is clear that the boys are quite young, as they wind each other up over who is the strongest and bravest, and who can dominate females better, which is a rather boyish thing. Indeed, it is quite obvious how the boys from both houses are so similar in thinking and in humour. From the first scene, we cannot identify any real differences between the boys, other than the fact that they are from different houses. Therefore, it is rather ironic how they extremely hate each other, when they are both very similar in many ways. ...read more.

Middle

It is something we cannot understand immediately while reading the play. Indeed, Luhrmann used this to highlight the extreme panic felt by the Montagues. It is interesting to note how in the original text of the play, it is the Capulets who bite their thumbs at the Montagues, and yet in his production, Luhrmann had the Montagues bite their thumb at the Capulets. When Tybalt seems to be looking for a fight, Benvolio is seen as the peace-maker, just like in the play. He draws his gun and threatens everyone with it. Here, Luhrmann again updated the sword to a gun because it makes it easier for modern audiences to appreciate this, and to take the idea more seriously. As soon as Benvolio draws his gun, everyone hesitates to do anything, and all the boys go silent, except for Tybalt, who lights a cigar. This is seen as a "cool" gesture. Luhrmann managed to portray to us Tybalt's more dangerous personality. He doesn't seem worried about what is going on. Luhrmann does a lot of camera close-ups, and they are very useful for the audiences' imagination. Close-ups are done on Tybalt's teeth, for example, to point out their sharpness and how they are so pointed. This is a very devilish image. Tybalt then speaks his words "What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word..." He speaks these words so slowly, and emphasizes on almost each syllable. This shows his fiery temper and his extreme hatredness and disgust towards peace. He then continues saying that he hates peace "As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee," referring to Benvolio. It is very clever how while Tybalt says the words "all Montagues", Luhrmann decided to close-up on Tybalt's shoes as he crushes the match which he used to light his cigar with. This image is very cruel and violent. It relates to the idea of his hatredness towards the Montagues, and it is almost as if he is crushing them. ...read more.

Conclusion

When Tybalt speaks his lines, he would act violently, and his facial expression would be one of agression and revenge. This helps bringing about his hostile nature. His words should stand out more than what the others are saying, because in this scene, he talks about hating peace, which is a very strong emotion, whereas the rest of the boys talk about bawdy humour. On the other hand, Romeo should appear to be a complete opposite of Tybalt. He would be wearing soft white clothes, which would symbolize his serene, romantic character. He could also be wearing a chain with a cross on it which would symbolize his na?vety or innocence to some extent. When Romeo speaks his lines, his voice would be dreamy and his face would be tilted upwards, so that he is looking into the sky. This would symbolize his deep thoughts in search of answers to his unanswered questions. When he looks into the sky, it is as though he is trying to go far beyond what man can see or possibly feel, and it would help bring out Romeo's philosophical mind and feelings. Moreover, the fact that he is madly in love with Rosaline, and the idea that she doesn't want him because she plans to be a nun, hurts him a lot. When he talks about Rosaline, and how he is "out of her favour where I am in love", he could sound a bit sorrow and unhappy. This would help point out to the audience Romeo's romantic, philosophical character, which contrasts greatly with the violent Tybalt. Considering the fact that I would be a director on Shakespeare's stage, which therefore means I can't use modern props or clever camera angles, I think that it would be necessary for all the characters acting on the stage i.e. Tybalt, Romeo, Benvolio etc. to face the audience. This is so that the audience would be aware of what was going on, and would be able to follow the story. The actors would also need to speak in a clear, rather loud voice to be heard by the audience. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    Romeo and Juliet had such a strong love that they would die for each other. This is what Shakespeare is trying to show us what love is all about and this is why he chose to write this story, not to show hate, but to show love.

  2. I intend to analyse and describe how Baz Luhrmann has converted William Shakespeare's written ...

    It can also represent a cross, showing the importance of religion in the story. THE CHARACTERS Baz Luhrmann has carefully chosen actors & actresses who have the right personality, speciality and looks for a particular character in the story. For example: For Juliet's part, a person who is pretty and

  1. How Shakespeare uses language to convey the relationship between Romeo and Juliet in his ...

    The prologue of this play is written in the form of a sonnet. Sonnets are a rhyming piece that has fourteen lines and follows a unique rhythm (a b a b c d c d e f e f g g).

  2. A Character Study on Tybalt and Mercutio, and as Director What Instructions I would ...

    a sin to take someone's life in this case more that it is his duty. Tybalt is a law unto himself. This scene also reinforces what I have already said about Tybalt, that he overreacts, is extreme, and excessive. I know this because he flew into a rage at the

  1. Compare Baz Luhrmann's version of the Shakespeare classic 'Romeo and Juliet' with the original ...

    The camera zooms in close to the gun and we see "Sword 9mm" on the barrel. Benvolio then puts away his gun and says that he wants peace. Tybalt replies with, "Peace? Peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee."

  2. How successful is Baz Luhrmann's adaptation of Romeo and Juliet in Representing William Shakespeare's ...

    The scene ends with the police helicopter containing Prince Escalus (ruler of Verona) warning the families of the consequence of a 4th brawl being death, being one of the final lines in the scene tells the audience that this line is important for what is to later be summoned.

  1. Auteur research study. Auteur? - Baz Luhrmann

    The audience is re-introduced to stories that appear tired but this theatrical device acknowledges their overuse. Luhrmann insists that his interest in universal storytelling has shaped his work into simple myths set in highly creative worlds. Unique as each of his films are, Luhrmann plays by three key rules; they are simple identifiable myths.

  2. I was confused at first when I watched Luhrman's version, as he has swapped ...

    The uniform consists of Hawiian shirts, trouser-braces and severe hairstyles; completing the 'cowboy-gangster' look with their trademark/signature-House weaponry. Both uniforms have an overall unique appearance, with similar attitudes, I get the impression that the 'Capulet' House are not as wealthy as the Montague House; for example the Leathers vs Hawiian shirts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work