• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Brutus' and Marc Antony's characters

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In this essay I am going to be writing about Brutus's and Marc Antony's characters. Brutus is a honest, noble and selfless. Antony is ambitious, devious and uses his speech to cancel out Brutus's speech. I am also going to be looking at their speeches and what devices they use. Brutus and Casseus work together with conspirators to kill Caesar. Caesar had good idea, which would work, but Brutus goes against him, thinking his tactics our good enough. Brutus is killing Caesar for the good of Rome, he knows that Caesar WILL OVERPOWER Rome and be too ambitious. Analysis of characters Brutus is an orator. Antony makes this clear by telling the crowd that he is "no orator as Brutus is". He can manipulate the crowds, because after his speech, the crowds cheer him. He does this by using rhetolical questions: "who is here so rude/ that would not be a Roman". By using the word "rude" nobody is going to object, or say anything. Secondly, I will note some of Brutus' negative points. The first point is that he is easily manipulated. We know this because Cassius makes him join the conspirators. This is quite strange, as Brutus was a good orator himself. He is decribed as a traitor by Mark Antony: "more strong than traitor's arms". ...read more.

Middle

Antony uses other clever techniques that help win over the Plebeians. He knows that hardly any of the Plebeians will be very well educated, so instead of appealing to their intellect, he decides to appeal to the one thing that he could be sure that they did have, emotion. He decides that he should try and be passionate, and make the Plebeians morn the death of Caesar (after all, it was a funeral!). Antony does this through several different ways. At the end of his first speech, Antony says: "O judgement, thou art fled to brutish beasts, And men have lost their reason! Bear with me,My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me." This would have been acted out on stage by a tearful Antony, who would be trying to continue his speech and not start crying out loud. This make the Plebeians feel sorry for Antony and it reminds them about Caesar and his good qualities. The affect of Antony crying also seems to dampen the mood in the crowd, so the whole crowd would probably be standing in silence, thinking about the decision that they have just made to follow Brutus. This would also allow Antony to pause and access the mood of the audience, gather his thoughts, and decide whether to pursue his strategy. ...read more.

Conclusion

It's the difference between Brutus, the idealistic leader and Antony, the idealistic realistic one. Brutus misjudges the audience and addresses them as if they were well-educated philosophers. Language used by Shakespeare reveals Brutus' intellectual mind and also shows how he lacks understanding of the human natures. He addresses them as if they were equal to him in education and philosophy, "Believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may to believe". Comparison is clear between Brutus and Antony who touches their emotions with his words, "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar and I must pause till it come back to me". Brutus refers to Caesar's ambition as a main cause for his assassination while Antony shows them Caesar's "will" and his wounds to inflame their feelings. I think that Brutus was right to kill Caesar. Julius Caesar was to ambitious, he was a person who when he wanted it he would get it. Brutus would of gone much further with Cassius's advice. Brutus was wrong in letting Mark Antrony speech last, even though he was only allowed to speech highly of them. He did that but he added more and twisted it so the audience thought differently. When they go to battle Brutus makes the mistake of walking write into Mark Antony and his army. If Brutus had followed Cassius's advice, they would both be alive and Mark Antony dead. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    And so he makes the crowds think twice about whether Caesar was in fact ambitious. This effects the development of the play as whole, as Antony is betraying and deceiving the conspirators and betrayal and deceit are two of the major themes of the play as Cassius deceives Brutus by

  2. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    hostile crowd, except this time they are opposing all of Mark Antony's views. Unlike Brutus, Mark Antony uses a more friendly opening, it is also more of a plea compared to Brutus' demand 'Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears' Not only does the first line show us that Mark

  1. Compare and Contrast Brutus and Antony's speeches

    as slaves, under Caesar's rule or would they prefer to live as freemen with Caesar dead. "Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen." Brutus continues on to ask if there are any Romans in the crowd, who love

  2. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    The introduction in similar to the speech of Brutus because it uses a pattern of three, yet Antony announces the plebeians as 'Friends' whereas Brutus does not. The speech is performed as poetry using blank versed Iambic Pentameter, which is powerful and appeals to the hearts of the plebeians and

  1. With close reference to the text explain how Mark Antony manipulates the crowd after ...

    much he has one the crowd but more importantly let the crowd absorb and reflect upon what he has said. Antony is rewarded for using the dramatic pause by a plebeian saying, "Methinks there is much reason in his sayings."

  2. Julius Caesar Essay

    "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears." He is appealing to their love for him first and patriotism last, the opposite to Brutus but again using the power of three. He also asks the crowd to listen instead of telling them to listen as Brutus did.

  1. Why is Mark Antony more successful than Brutus in winning over the crowd at ...

    sarcasm at intervals in his speech; he repeats these particular words; "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man". The repetition of these words after all the listed achievements that Caesar has made gradually convinces the crowd to favour Caesar, or rather at least put them

  2. Why is Anthony more successful than Brutus in winning over the crowd at Caesars ...

    These are all the reasons as to why Anthony's speech in convincing the people of Rome is much better than Brutus. Anthony speaks in a clever way than Brutus and says things indirectly to the people. Anthony lets the people decide about what he has just said where as Brutus gives the public pressure that they have to believe him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work