• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Brutus' and Marc Antony's characters

Extracts from this document...


In this essay I am going to be writing about Brutus's and Marc Antony's characters. Brutus is a honest, noble and selfless. Antony is ambitious, devious and uses his speech to cancel out Brutus's speech. I am also going to be looking at their speeches and what devices they use. Brutus and Casseus work together with conspirators to kill Caesar. Caesar had good idea, which would work, but Brutus goes against him, thinking his tactics our good enough. Brutus is killing Caesar for the good of Rome, he knows that Caesar WILL OVERPOWER Rome and be too ambitious. Analysis of characters Brutus is an orator. Antony makes this clear by telling the crowd that he is "no orator as Brutus is". He can manipulate the crowds, because after his speech, the crowds cheer him. He does this by using rhetolical questions: "who is here so rude/ that would not be a Roman". By using the word "rude" nobody is going to object, or say anything. Secondly, I will note some of Brutus' negative points. The first point is that he is easily manipulated. We know this because Cassius makes him join the conspirators. This is quite strange, as Brutus was a good orator himself. He is decribed as a traitor by Mark Antony: "more strong than traitor's arms". ...read more.


Antony uses other clever techniques that help win over the Plebeians. He knows that hardly any of the Plebeians will be very well educated, so instead of appealing to their intellect, he decides to appeal to the one thing that he could be sure that they did have, emotion. He decides that he should try and be passionate, and make the Plebeians morn the death of Caesar (after all, it was a funeral!). Antony does this through several different ways. At the end of his first speech, Antony says: "O judgement, thou art fled to brutish beasts, And men have lost their reason! Bear with me,My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me." This would have been acted out on stage by a tearful Antony, who would be trying to continue his speech and not start crying out loud. This make the Plebeians feel sorry for Antony and it reminds them about Caesar and his good qualities. The affect of Antony crying also seems to dampen the mood in the crowd, so the whole crowd would probably be standing in silence, thinking about the decision that they have just made to follow Brutus. This would also allow Antony to pause and access the mood of the audience, gather his thoughts, and decide whether to pursue his strategy. ...read more.


It's the difference between Brutus, the idealistic leader and Antony, the idealistic realistic one. Brutus misjudges the audience and addresses them as if they were well-educated philosophers. Language used by Shakespeare reveals Brutus' intellectual mind and also shows how he lacks understanding of the human natures. He addresses them as if they were equal to him in education and philosophy, "Believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may to believe". Comparison is clear between Brutus and Antony who touches their emotions with his words, "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar and I must pause till it come back to me". Brutus refers to Caesar's ambition as a main cause for his assassination while Antony shows them Caesar's "will" and his wounds to inflame their feelings. I think that Brutus was right to kill Caesar. Julius Caesar was to ambitious, he was a person who when he wanted it he would get it. Brutus would of gone much further with Cassius's advice. Brutus was wrong in letting Mark Antrony speech last, even though he was only allowed to speech highly of them. He did that but he added more and twisted it so the audience thought differently. When they go to battle Brutus makes the mistake of walking write into Mark Antony and his army. If Brutus had followed Cassius's advice, they would both be alive and Mark Antony dead. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    Whereas his second motivation step is telling the plebeians about Caesar being ambitious and questioning whether or not he actually was ambitious "Was this ambition?" He then asks a rhetorical question to the plebeians "What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?"

  2. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    Moreover by stating that it is Brutus who 'hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so...' he emphasises that it is not he who believes this. Also as he says 'if it were so' he emphasises that it might not be true as it is only 'if'.

  1. Julius Caersar - Analysis of Brutus

    Brutus could not really predict what Caesar would have done with the crown. He did know that if Caesar was crowned, however, then he had no chance of ever being crowned himself. Brutus filled the description of the tragic hero quite well.

  2. Comparison of the Speeches made by Brutus and Antony in the Marketplace

    But this is ironic, as earlier in the play, Brutus condemned Caesar for his self-inflated use of his own name. It is furthermore interesting when the Plebeians say: "Let him be Caesar." "Caesar's better parts Shall be crowned in Brutus" This suggests that the Plebeians did in fact like some qualities of Caesar.

  1. Compare and contrast the speeches made by Brutus and Antony over the body of ...

    They change their minds very quickly, and although they are on Antony's side after both speeches, one wonders that if Antony had spoken first, would they then be on Brutus' side? Antony understands the crowd's psychology much better than Brutus, and through this he manipulates them.

  2. Why is Mark Antony more successful than Brutus in winning over the crowd at ...

    in two minds about who they should believe more out of Antony and Brutus. Antony's speech and the Plebeians' uncertainty is heightened by his grief and sorrow, which the crowd are evidently aware of. "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man" gradually becomes said with

  1. Why is Anthony more successful than Brutus in winning over the crowd at Caesars ...

    that they rid of Brutus and the rest of the conspirators giving Anthony a clear victory in winning over the public. The mistake that Brutus had made was that he allowed Anthony to speak at the funeral but he kept his word that he did not blame the conspirators directly

  2. Julius Caesar Essay

    This would appeal to the people more and help in winning them on his side. When people quote these speeches in modern life, the starting part of Anthony's speech is always quoted, "Friends, Romans, Countrymen..." where Brutus' never is. This also helps to show that Anthony's opening is much more powerful and impressive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work