Discuss How Miller Presents The Theme Of Greed And Envy within 'The Crucible'.

Authors Avatar

                                4th October 2004

Discuss How Miller Presents The Theme Of

Greed And Envy within ‘The Crucible’.

‘The Crucible’ was written in 1953 by Arthur Miller in the time of the cold war, although the play was set in 1692. The play is about a town called Salem in America and about the witch-hunts that took place there. Because it was written in this time period there is a feeling of mistrust, greed and envy echoed in the play. Arthur Miller plays on these feelings and produces a theme of greed and envy that is critical to the whole play. I will be discussing this theme further.

 

Miller first introduces the theme of greed and envy by creating many social tensions in Act 1. We can tell there are social tensions because of the way the people speak to each other, such as when Mr Putnam says to Mr Parris ‘“No witchcraft! Now look you, Mr Parris –“’ (Pg 10.) This shows us that Parris and Putnam must have a history between them of unfriendly feelings, as not many people would dare stand up to a minister. This unfriendliness is confirmed by the piece of analytical text Miller has included (pg 11) to help us understand it better. In this piece of text he writes, ‘Some time before, Thomas Putnam’s brother-in-law, James Bayley, had been turned down as minister of Salem.’ This gives us the idea that Putnam is resentful of Mr Parris, because Parris acquired the job Putnam’s brother-in-law would have got.

Another example of social tension is when Mrs Putnam says, “You think it God’s work you should never lose a child, nor a grandchild either, and I bury all but one?” This is a sarcastic comment from Mrs Putnam to Rebecca Nurse and it shows that Mrs Putnam is bitter and blames Rebecca Nurse for her children’s deaths. An audience might react to these social tensions by becoming more involved with the play and resenting or accepting the characters as if they were real life people.

Join now!

We can tell there are social tensions between most of the characters because of the stage directions too. For instance when Proctor and Parris are having an argument (pg 25) there is a stage direction that says ‘Proctor goes angrily to the door and turns to Corey with a smile.’ Because of this direction we know that what Proctor is about to say is a taunt to Parris to evoke an emotion. Whereas, if the stage direction was not there we could interpret what he is going to say as having some different meaning. It is important to have this ...

This is a preview of the whole essay