• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss How Tension Is Created Through Character, Language and Action in Act III of The Crucible

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss How Tension Is Created Through Character, Language and Action in Act III of "The Crucible" The Crucible is a play written by Arthur Miller in 1953. Arthur Miller uses character, language and action in Act III of The Crucible in order to create a certain amount of tension and different atmospheres. The play has a dual historical context of the Salem witch trials and McCarthy era in America. In this Act, John Proctor loses his fight for justices in Salem. He originally goes into the court to defend and save his wife but ends up being accused of witchcraft himself. This becomes vital to the tension in the Act, as there is a very tin line between Proctor winning and losing his case. The whole Act revolves around the fight between Proctor and Abigail for Danforth's approval and belief. The rivalry between the two characters builds up the tension, as we, as an audience, know about Abigail and Proctor's previous affair. Miller uses dramatic irony to help create tension. We know that Proctor is seeking justice but also has a great secret. Miller also creates tension through language. Proctor is not quite in control so he uses implicit threats rather than explicit threats. ...read more.

Middle

'No, I cannot, I cannot stop my mouth; it's God's work I do.' Abigail also uses threatening language. 'You're the devils man!' This inevitably raises the tension, as the audience do not know how the threatened person will react. Abigail has enough power that she can threaten people explicitly, 'let you beware, Mr Danforth. Think you be so mighty that the power of Hell may not turn your wits, beware of it.' This raises the tension as Abigail is threatening Danforth, who is the most powerful person in the room; we have no idea how he will react to her explicit threat. Abigail's struggle for power creates the tension. Pleasing language is also used in order to increase the tension, Abigail pleads with 'Mary's Spirit' and the yellow bird, begging it to stop attacking her. This creates a climax of tension in which the frustration of both the audience and Proctor increases. Furthermore, action is used to increase the tension; Abigail's action is sudden and unexpected 'to the ceiling as if trying to talk it out of attacking her.' As she is so convincing, the audience is drawn into her deception, which also increases the tension. 'Pointing with fear, now rising up her frightened eyes.' ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, Miller increases the tension by making the audience wait for a reply, using pauses as a dramatic device. Danforth is the most powerful person in the Act and is biased towards Abigail, believing her instantly over Proctor. This allows Miller to create tension by having him in a position of authority. This means that Miller can use him to silence particular characters or to force them to speak. Miller uses Danforth to direct our attention and focal points. Danforth uses religious language, which builds up tension 'you are, in all respects, a gospel Christian.' By using religious language, Danforth asserts his power and supports his views. By asking questions about the other characters actions, the tension is also raises. Miller uses Danforth as a balance in the scene. Danforth also uses threatening language 'you will remain where you are.' This shows that he is still in power and will not be controlled by Abigail, even though we, as an audience, know that this is not true. It is not necessary for Danforth to have a lot of dialogue. His presence suggests power. Overall, the main tension throughout the Act is created through Language and Character. Action is used as an anticlimax from that great build-up of tension. The constant shifting of power between Proctor and Abigail causes the tension in the audience to build-up as they wish to know the final outcome. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. The Crucible - Power and Manipulation

    a very decisive judge, and was therefore in no position to be questioned by anyone. Danforth abused and manipulated his power because he was very well aware that his decisions could not be contradicted. Danforth was convinced that he was doing his job to the best of his ability; however his best was not good enough.

  2. A Close Focus On Act Iii of ‘the Crucible’ the Play, ‘the Crucible’.

    Hale travelled around the houses of the accused so he could get to know those who were being accused. But the truth is that even at this earlier stage, he was unsure about the truth of all this. When he goes to the Proctors, he tests John's Christian faith by

  1. GCSE Essay on Act III of the Crucible

    The characters on stage react to this in an expected way; Danforth appears to be confused and horrified and is shouting at Proctor "Man! Man, what do you-"we can see how severe the potential charge of "whore" could be. When Proctor attempts to justify this charge he is shown on

  2. By What means does Miller create a sense of Expectations within his audience in ...

    This quotation shows the anger building up inside Eddie and by his words you know he's angry. As Alfieri and Eddie Speak Eddie gets very dramatic and shocked that nothing can happen unless Eddie tells the immigration office. But Eddie refused and started shouting at Alfieri and complaining about the

  1. How does Miller use the development of characters and their interaction with others to ...

    (To Proctor and the others.) And I bid you all do like wise. In an ordinary crime, how does one defend the accused? One calls up witnesses to prove his innocence. But witchcraft is ipso facto, on its face and by its nature, an invisible crime is it not?

  2. The Crucible as a piece of drama is structurally flawed. It reaches a climax ...

    The historical context of this play shows us the social injustices of the Salem witch trials but it is also a reflection of the social injustices at the time of McCarthyism. In this play the character of John Proctor symbolically represents Arthur Miller.

  1. The Crucible - How does Arthur Miller make Act III of the Crucible exciting ...

    This is when the 'battle' between the two teams begins. The whole of Act III is a struggle between two groups of characters. The 'Goodies', lead by John, are the team that the audience want to win. They are up against the 'Baddies', lead by Abigail.

  2. The Manipulator and The Brainwasher.

    Meaning that the manipulator will force, threat, abuse and pressure you into following their beliefs or what they are doing. If you don't listen and follow what they tell you to do bad things will come upon you. Just look at what Abigail Williams did in The Crucible by Arthur

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work