Discuss how the two poets present their views of the city of London.

Authors Avatar

Alex Calloway                                                        Sunday, 22 September 2002

Discuss how the two poets present their views of the city of London

This essay is a comparison on the way in which Wordsworth and Blake present their views on London in the two poems, “Upon Westminster Bridge” and “London”. There are similarities and differences between the two poems, in both the poets views and the way those views are presented.

        The first poem, “London”, describes a very negative view of the city of London, Blake uses language with many negative connotations, “blood, … woe, … infant’s cry, … hearse”, this vocabulary reflects Blake’s negative views of the humanity of London as he is walking its streets. Yet, it is not just of London that his views are negative, his views of marriage appear so also, “The mind-forged manacles I hear”, Blake has used the metaphor of chains to illustrate marriage as a prison, one chosen by oneself, “mind forged”.  Particularly black and depressing is the final stanza, in which Blake describes the story of a young girl, “How the youthful harlot’s curse blasts the new born infant’s tear”. This miserable story of a prostitute and her illegitimate child represent the poet’s views of the misery and melancholy humanity of London.

Join now!

        The Second poem “Upon Westminster Bridge” is a complete contrast to Blake’s; it is a wholly positive image of London. It seems written almost in response to London’s critics, “Dull would he be of soul who could pass by…” the first stanza describes London’s “majesty” and ridicules those who cannot see it. Within the poem, Wordsworth describes the beauty of the view, from Westminster Bridge, across the rest of London, in the early morning tranquillity, before the rest of the city begins it’s day and shatters the piece, “Ne’er saw I, never felt, a calm so deep!” the poem is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay