• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the change or lack of change undergone by the main characters in Arthur Miller's - The Crucible

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the change or lack of change undergone by the main characters. In 1953 Arthur Miller wrote a play entitled The Crucible, by writing this he aimed to challenge the assumptions of US society and led people to question each others responsibilities. In the 1950's senator Joe McCarthy started to exploit the US fears of communism and organised a witch hunt. Miller would have seen this as similar to the Holocaust in the sense that people were being wrongly accused of being witches when they were not. Arthur was a Jew and so would have had sympathy with these people and this in my eyes was one of the key factors in the writing of this play. During the 17th century there was an outbreak in the belief of witchcraft in Europe. This led to mass immigration from Europe to America; the immigrants were Puritans and so set up their own strict Christian communities. This is how Salem, Massachusetts came into being. Miller's characters convey my point through their change of personality from Act I through to Act IV. There are different types of change throughout the play such as change in character, beliefs and loyalty and these all occur at some point in the play to different characters. ...read more.

Middle

We are first introduced to him during Act I, Miller describes John Proctor as, '...a farmer in his middle thirties. He need not have been a partisan of any faction in the town' This shows that Proctor was a good man, and that, even though the witchcraft accusations had come about, there was no need for Proctor to be involved, he did not have anything to do with the Devil and was a Puritan throughout. He is also shown to us by Miller as a man worthy of admirers, 'In Proctor's presence a fool felt his foolishness instantly - ...'. This quote shows Miller wanted the audience to feel that Proctor was a figure that the people in Salem looked up to, aspired to be like in the future. Dramatic irony is then used when Proctor says, 'I've heard you be a sensible man, Mr Hale. I hope you'll leave some of it in Salem'. This line makes the audience aware that Proctor himself does not believe the witch claims in Salem, he is ridiculing them. In doing so the audience see him as a strong man with good beliefs and a man who is only trying to do what is right for Salem. ...read more.

Conclusion

She couldn't possible, meaning she obviously is like that deep down; it is just that Miller chooses to hide this from the audience up until the end. Act III happens to be the last we see of Abigail and even in this short period we see her for is enough to show she has changed somewhat significantly. At the beginning she tried to hide her real personality beneath a barrage of cuteness and innocence but towards the end she has been threatened by the whole ordeal that much that she no longer tries to hide it and instead is rather loud about the situation. The way Arthur Miller presents the characters throughout is obvious, he intends to show radical change throughout the play. The radical change of the characters in such a short space of time engrosses the audience and interests them. it makes them eagerly await the rest of the play and see if any more change is to occur. Personally I believe the only interesting part in The Crucible is the display of change from the different characters, this is because of how Miller presents it, using stage directions and speech to get his point across. This shows that as the play is so famous the way Miller presents change must be rather special to entice all these audiences. ?? ?? ?? ?? Daniel O'Donnell 11JR ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. How Does Arthur Miller Present The Characters of Abigail and Elizabeth and Shape Our ...

    trying to do: 'She wants me dead...she will cry me out until they take me'. Miller has presented Elizabeth throughout the play to be a gentle and rational Puritan, and for this reason he has not presented Elizabeth's dislike of Abigail to be as obvious as Abigail's' hate for Elizabeth.

  2. To what extent can John Proctor be described as a tragic hero in Arthur ...

    then the protagonist must need to be so pure and faultless as to force us to deny his validity as a character. From neither of these views can tragedy derive, simply because neither represents a balanced concept of life."(Miller tragedy and the common man)

  1. "The Crucible" - John Proctor says, "I'll tell you what's walking Salem, vengeance is ...

    there any other cause than you have told me, for your being discharged from Goody Proctor's service...she comes so rarely to church this year for she will not sit so close to something soiled. What signified that remark?" By the way that she responds to this, it is simple to

  2. 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller - Discuss the appeal of 'The Crucible' to its ...

    An example of how Miller tries to create a temporal setting to make the assemblage feel they are in the 17th century is evident because a candle is used as a source of light, which is extremely rare in our modern society.

  1. Choose one character from The Crucible and explore how they change throughout the course ...

    By just reading through the play there is no indication of how the character says what he/she is saying. With Proctor this indication are very useful as his mood changes in different situations and helps you to understand when he is angry like he is in the part of the act.

  2. Analyse and discuss the way in which Arthur Miller presents the relationship between John ...

    done the bad deed in the first place so it should be him dealing with such a situation. When the play itself was written it would have been the men in charge of the women, who were the once who saw to there every need and done everything for them.

  1. The crucible: "Proctor is a guilt-ridden individual struggling to find his true self." To ...

    A "knowing smile" usually suggests a secret, but this is not a small secret kept between friends, it is such a secret that can ruin a man's reputation forever; a secret shared by lovers. Even though Proctor knows that communicating with Abigail could seriously jeopardise his marriage, he still cannot resist smiling when he sees her.

  2. John Proctor is the tragic hero of "The Crucible". Discuss

    All along all John Proctor wanted was personal integrity. He reaffirms ?I am John Proctor?, Knowing he has lost everything exept his name. Thru this story proctors moral strength was tested Proctor emerges out of all of this, not with fame or riches, but with his name. Proctor had to decide what he was willing to do in order to remain a proper human being.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work