• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss The Dramatic Presentation of Justice and Morality in 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss The Dramatic Presentation of Justice and Morality in 'The Crucible' The crucible written by Arthur Miller, in 1953 is set in the heart of puritan 16th century America. The main plot is about the witch hunts during that period and the lives that were affected by it. Although the play is about the witch hunts in Salem in the 16th century, the sub plot is really referring to the injustice that Miller himself was experiencing when he wrote it. In the play, it was not only acceptable practice in Salem to accuse people of witchery (usually women) but it was also acceptable to render them completely unable to defend themselves from such accusations. The society's Puritanism, hysteria and conflicting views on morality and all that is just accounted for the horrendous tragedies to follow. Justice and morality are the main themes introduced throughout the play - justice, meaning the administration of law according to prescribed and accepted principles and morality, meaning the degree to which something is morally acceptable. Many issues associated with justice and morality such as the difficulties and dangers of conforming to strict principles including the consequences of the misuse of justice are also highlighted in the play. This essay will discuss those themes and how the audience is presented with them dramatically. ...read more.

Middle

But as we see in the next scene, she threatens her own friends into silence. "Let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word about the other things, and i will come to you in the black of some terrible night and i will bring some pointy reckoning that will shudder you. And you know i can do it." The "evil" that made her capable of drinking chicken's blood made the girls fear her, so much so that when Procter asked Mary (his house helper) to tell the courts about Abigail she replied "she'll kill me for saying that". Juxtaposition was also used to show the different levels of morality between the characters. Throughout all the chaos of trying to find who is moral and who isn't, the audience is fully aware that Abigail was behind it all and she is the person lacking in morals. This made it possible for the audience to make the contrast between her and the other members of the community. Again Abigail's acted superiority complex revealed itself when Reverend Parris asked her why no-one in the village had rehired her, she replied by saying how they wanted to enslave her and how she would not "blacken her face for any of them". ...read more.

Conclusion

Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang! How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!". Proctor's desire to preserve his good name kept him from testifying against Abigail. In the end, however, he came to a true understanding of what a good reputation meant and what course of action was needed. This defense of his name enabled him to muster the courage to die, heroically, with his goodness and name intact. Miller's purpose in writing a play steeped in issues of morality and justice is to leave a message for future generations. He lived in a time known as the Mccarthy era, where people would betray life-long friends by telling the government about their perceived communistic leanings. Many people lost their jobs, reputations, prides and most importantly their 'names'. Arthur Miller used his depiction of the Salem witch trials to further illustrate to people that they had not learned much from that dark chapter in American history. He also wanted to warn people of the dangers of blind conformity and the "sheep syndrome" where people find it is safer to follow the crowd because they are too afraid to take an individual and unpopular stance. Miller was trying to show us that if there were more courageous people like Procter, then many of the ghastly things that have happened in history could have been prevented. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. How Does Miller convey his Message through 'The Crucible'?

    Take it to heart, Mr Parris. There are many others who stay away from church these days because you hardly ever mention God any more.' Again, it seems he emphasises the evident 'lack' of God in church, and in deed, Salem. Later on, he states that when he was last there "...he [i.e.

  2. How does Miller handle the theme of Justice in 'The Crucible' and what message ...

    This shows by not allowing people to speak their thoughts no criticism could be accepted. If people cannot put forward their argument then it is not possible to conduct a fair trial. Like the US senators if no one was able to speak against them then they could carry out unfair justice because what they said would have gone unquestioned.

  1. How does the character and language of Abigail Williams contribute to the dramatic effect ...

    In summary of act three there is a lot of tension built up by Goody Proctor been found guilty. And the dramatic effect brought to the play by Abigail being selfish and very misleading. Act four is situated in a jail cell were John is tied up after admitting to being connected to the devil and possessed with evil spirits.

  2. Look at Miller's presentation of Abigail in 'The Crucible'. How realistic is his presentation ...

    The fact that Abigail's affair was with John Proctor (a moral and religious man of high standing amongst the other citizens of Salem) gives her more kudos than if it had been with another, more easily won, man. This is because he is described as being 'a sinner...against his own vision of decent conduct'.

  1. Examine the importance of leadership and morality in The Crucible.

    Although she knows that there has be no actual witchcraft, yet continues with the idea in order to save herself and attack others. She makes a number of allegations against other women, "I saw Alice Barrows with the devil" being one example of her condemning and innocent person.

  2. I have given you my soul. Leave me my name: What kind of character ...

    I feel she knows that John wont commit the sin of adultery again but she blames herself her him doing it the first time. It seems to me that compared to Proctor Elizabeth seems less sure of herself and that she thinks she has less power.

  1. The Crucible by Arthur Miller - Abigail Williams - Character Study.

    Unable to lie outright for the obviousness of it she makes another at Danforth. She is confident of her power over him from her last threat. And sure that it unsteadies him. After another heavily persuasive and insistent contribution from Proctor she knows its time.

  2. "The Crucible" as a piece of drama is structurally flawed. It reaches a climax ...

    Elizabeth is seen as a good Christian woman, wife and mother. She cannot lie and the audience know this though Abigail says she is a "gossiping liar". Now Abigail may be seen as a liar. After Abigail's conversation with John the audience know about her affair and that she still loves him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work