Discuss The Dramatic Presentation of Justice and Morality in 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller.

Authors Avatar

Discuss The Dramatic Presentation of Justice and Morality in 'The Crucible'

The crucible written by Arthur Miller, in 1953 is set in the heart of puritan 16th century America.  The main plot is about the witch hunts during that period and the lives that were affected by it.  Although the play is about the witch hunts in Salem in the 16th century, the sub plot is really referring to the injustice that Miller himself was experiencing when he wrote it.

In the play, it was not only acceptable practice in Salem to accuse people of witchery (usually women) but it was also acceptable to render them completely unable to defend themselves from such accusations. The society's Puritanism, hysteria and conflicting views on morality and all that is just accounted for the horrendous tragedies to follow.

Justice and morality are the main themes introduced throughout the play - justice, meaning the administration of law  according to prescribed and accepted principles and morality, meaning the degree to which something is morally acceptable.  Many issues associated with justice and morality such as the difficulties and dangers of conforming to strict principles including the consequences of the misuse of justice are also highlighted in the play. This essay will discuss those themes and how the audience is presented with them dramatically.

'The Crucible' meaning something in which substances are melted at high temperatures could be referring to a cauldron used by witches or an explosive situation. 'The Crucible' also means a severe test or trial which could be referring to the difficult decisions the characters had to make. The ambiguity of the title makes it difficult for the audience to fully understand and predict the nature and mood of the play outrightly. Throughout the play the audience is subtly presented with particular emotive issues.  Miller used the literary device of an allegory to be able to depict them to maximum effect.  He used lighting to convey emotions and tones, the same way he would a character. For example the footnotes of act one mention a candle in the room and sunrays beaming through the window giving the room "an air of clean spareness". This could be interpreted as reflecting the way in which the puritans perceived themselves, free from corruption or impurities.  Throughout the play, light was used to symbolize scenes depicting kindness, softer, more sincere emotions or highlight good characters in the play.  But as the plot thickens, Miller uses less light which draws the audience towards the climax of the play. Dark lighting generally denotes bad atmosphere, for example the courtroom in Act Three is described as a "solemn, forbidding place" even though light shone through the back window.  Again, at the very end of Act Four, when John Proctor is finally led away, Reverend Hale begins to pray and a light shines on his face.  Again light is used to show raw emotions, and to portray both Proctor and Hale as good pious people.

Join now!

John Procter is one of the main, if not the main character in the play, however in the Act One he is hardly mentioned.  He was a local farmer who lived just outside of the village and was married to Elizabeth Procter with two children.  He was the only person in Salem able to see through the hypocrisy of many of the townsfolk.  Whereas people like Judge Danforth and Reverend Parris who claimed to have god in their hearts and lives were quick to condemn people they thought were less holy than them.  The question posed therefore is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay