• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the meeting of Stanley and Mompesson in Act 1. Consider it's dramatic effectiveness and it's importance in relation to the play as a whole.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the meeting of Stanley and Mompesson in Act 1. Consider it's dramatic effectiveness and it's importance in relation to the play as a whole. When the audience first meet Mompesson, he is being shown around the village, to the rector's house. You learn about Mompesson from his conversation with George Savile, "the rector of God has no enemies, only sheep to be fed" is what Mompesson thinks. Savile tells him he is wrong, "now rinse that starch from your face my boy...come two steps down from heaven to speak to these people...you'll have to make concessions". By Savile having to say this, and from what Mompesson previously said, we learn that he is quite high and mighty, or at least he thinks he is, and the people won't like him for that. Stanley first comes onto the scene when the harvest celebrations have begun. He disapproves of them happening, as it is against his puritanical beliefs, and the first thing he says is "this is a sad sight Edward Thornley". As he begins talking to Thornley, it quickly becomes clear that Thornley still sees Stanley as his rector. They both share the opinion put forward by Thornley about Mompesson, that he's "a youngster, full of arrogance and spleen, who spits in the dust as we pass." Stanley has a dark, brooding presence, which contrasts darkly with the happy feel of the celebration and the audience would be able to tell this about him from his appearance and the things he says. ...read more.


This meeting is also preparing the audience for any future conflicts that will occur, as in their second meeting later on in the play. Mompesson is less restrained than before-he is not so formal and polite towards Stanley, even though at first Stanley is stiffly polite to him. Stanley starts trying to tell Mompesson that he shouldn't be giving the people false hopes by saying its "too cold for plague", and Mompesson just points out if Stanley had helped him, if his "heart had been anything but stone", he wouldn't have to be. When Stanley tries to leave, Mompesson won't let him, as he wants Stanley to hear him out. Mompesson has changed a lot since the last meeting, he has seen forty-three people die and that there was no hope as Stanley refused to help him. He feels resentment towards him as well as anger, and now he is making no effort to be nice, since he was spurned last time. This gives a change in the creator of the antagonism, especially at the start of the meeting. At the end Stanley says, "we will not meet again", but even though Mompesson does not wish to meet him he knows "in a small village that is unlikely"-that them meeting for a third time is inevitable. Before their third meeting Stanley has a soliloquy where he is finally open and truthful about himself, and how he's changed. ...read more.


It makes the audience aware that their feelings go far deeper than just their personal beliefs and conflict. There were many plays written at this period of time, which were written as reactions to what had happened like when there was the Commonwealth. That had been a Puritanical rule, and so theatres were banned. After Charles II returned to the throne it was almost as if they were trying to make up for losses during the previous years, with the amount of plays written. They were popular then as it gave people a chance to laugh at the way it was portrayed if it was a comedy, or just for them to reflect back on what had happened if it was a drama, it also gave them insights into what life at court (with the king) might be like, or other parts of Britain. Nowadays, people studying plays know what to expect from plays from different parts of history-the difference in plot, themes and characters (like if a king is in one)-and they can identify where in history plays are from. This makes them popular now as it gives people an insight into what life might have been like back in the 1600's for example, and an example of such a history play is The Way of the World, by William Congreve, which was written about 1700. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Other Authors section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Other Authors essays

  1. How does Ayub Khan-Din portray conflict in the play East is East

    It is blatantly difficult for George to give his children the same upbringing as himself, as they were Anglo-Pakistani growing up in an English environment. One of the first examples of conflict due to culture was in Scene 1 on page 5 when he says to Ella "All men think bad, my son having this thing has to be cutting".

  2. In Harold Pinter's 'The Birthday Party' is it true to say that the character ...

    In the first act of the play it does not seem that the character of Stanley is tragic in anyway. It seems the complete opposite in fact. Stanley appears to be the 'man of the house' as he seems to have control over the two elderly characters, Petey and Meg.

  1. Looking closely at Pygmalion, consider the relationship between Higgins and Eliza. Where do ...

    At the end of the argument Eliza finishes politely by asking what she can take away with her so therefore telling Higgins she does not want to stay: "I want to know what I may take away with me. I don't want to be accused of stealing."(p79).

  2. How does Shaw draw the audience's attention to issues of social class in Act ...

    The audience find it quite comical and rather astounding when Eliza announces "I've never had a bath in my life" and then goes on to say "I've never took all my clothes off before. It's not right: it's not decent".

  1. Ralph says "Things are breaking up I don't understand why. We began well. We ...

    At the start of the novel the youngest boys are called small boys. They become 'little'uns' 'littl'uns', and finally 'littluns'. Percival Wemys Madison gradually forgets his name and address. When the naval officer finds them, he has forgotten it completely.

  2. What is the Importance of the setting in Rebecca?

    The detail runs right through the book and gives you every little detail that you need. The setting that Daphne Du Maurier describes, really draw you into the story and really make you feel like you are there in Manderley.

  1. I am going to write about how Walter undergoes a transformation in the play ...

    His feelings are shown by the quotation, "Mama, you know it's all divided up. Life is. Sure enough between the takers and the token".

  2. Explain how Arnold Wesker shows the way an everyday situation can turn into a ...

    This shows that it is just normal day because the way there are talking is normal and also they are playing a game and that?s normal. Also the place that is happing is in a train and this shows that it?s a normal day and people are acting normal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work