• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss this view of responsibility, guilt and blame in ‘An Inspector Calls’ and discuss how the Inspector functions as a dramatic device.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The Inspector does not condemn- his job is to warn- he is more concerned with the principle of collective responsibility. "We'll have to share the guilt." (PG 28) He is only concerned with individuals in so far as they help or hinder society as a whole. "We are members of one body." (PG 54) Discuss this view of responsibility, guilt and blame in 'An Inspector Calls' and discuss how the Inspector functions as a dramatic device. Priestley wanted to ensure life after the war was better than before and he hoped that through his writing he could influence people's ideas and change society. Although he wrote an Inspector Calls in 1945, (a week after the war ended) he deliberately set it in 1912 because that time represented the sort of society everybody wanted to leave behind. The message of the play was particularly effective to the audiences of 1946. Priestley knew that the message of his play would reach the war-weary audiences of the era more effectively than it would reach the audiences of a different time. The "fire and blood and anguish" reference to the First and Second World Wars would be very influential to the audience. The audiences had experienced the horrors of war and were not eager to experience them again, so they may think that if they followed JB Priestley's message, they would prevent yet another world war. Priestley wrote this play intentionally as he saw an urgent need for social change and used the play to express his desire for social equality. The time span between the dates used (1945-1912) is to make us aware of what has happened and learn from mistakes made. Priestley hoped his play would give society the chance with hindsight to look back on the past and not just carry on life in the same way as before. He was particularly concerned about the living conditions of the lower classes, represented by Eva Smith (the name "Smith" being cleverly used: a common name ...read more.

Middle

She is very distressed by the girl's suicide and thinks that her father's behaviour was unacceptable. She readily agrees that she behaved very badly and insists that she never meant the girl any harm. The Inspector says that she is only partly responsible and later on, when he is about to question Gerald, he encourages her to stay and listen to what he has to say so that she does not feel entirely responsible. Not only is she prepared to admit her faults, she also appears keen and anxious to change her behaviour in the future, "I will never, never do it again". (PG) She is aware of the mystery surrounding the Inspector, yet realises that there is no point in trying to hide the facts from him. She is mature about the breaking up of her engagement and remains calm. She will not be rushed into accepting the ring back once the Inspector has left. She is unable to accept her parents' attitude and is both amazed and concerned that they have not learned anything from the episode. Although the Inspector might be a hoax, the family have still behaved in an entirely unsuitable manner. She learns of her responsibilities to others less fortunate than herself (the idea of the community) and is sensitive. Her readiness to learn from experience is in great contrast to her parents. Gerald croft, at the beginning of the play, is thought of a respectable upper class man who is getting married to Sheila. Unsurprisingly, he also has a secret that is uncovered. He had kept Daisy Renton as his mistress for a time when simultaneously courting Sheila. Indeed, had he not been engaged to Sheila his conduct would have been entirely acceptable for a normal relationship. However, the fact that he was means that he is thought of in very low esteem by Sheila and her parents after he tells the details of his affair. ...read more.

Conclusion

It symbolises that you cannot run from your conscience, as the Birlings will find out. Priestley uses the dramatic twist of the Inspector returning at the end of the play to emphasis this point, and makes it more effective by placing it just as the characters are beginning to relax. It serves to 'prick' the consciences of both the characters and the audience. At the end of reading the play, I was left feeling as if I would like to think I had learned from the example of the Birlings and the message it contained. As it is a play though, I would have liked to see it acted out. The ending is well crafted, leaving an open ending to add to the dramatic effect, but looking at it differently, there is not really another way to have ended the play after that plot twist other than an open ending where it was without ruining the play itself. I think the majority of people who have seen this play would have liked to think of themselves as an Eric or a Sheila. The aims of Priestley when he wrote this play, I believe, were to make us think, to make us question our own characters and beliefs. He wasted to show us that we can change, and we can decide which views we side with. He wanted us to ask ourselves if we wanted to be a Sheila or a Sybil, an Eric or an Arthur. Or, were we in-between like Gerald. Priestley wanted the audience to learn from the mistakes of the Birlings. I think that Priestley wanted to make a difference; not a world changing difference, but a small difference in the way people think. Then, if you think of every person who coming out of the play gave some money to a beggar in the street, you would see that Priestley did make a difference. It would have changed people's views on society, however small those changes would be, and so Priestley achieved his aims in writing the play. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lucy Webster 10H ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The apportioning of blame and responsibility are central themes in 'An Inspector Calls'. Each ...

    4 star(s)

    At the end when everybody realizes the inspector was really a fake the only people who seem happy about this are Mr and Mrs Birling and Gerald. This shows how narrow minded they are. Mr birling most of all, treating the occasion as something to celebrate by saying 'Gerald-have a drink'.

  2. Discussthe role of the Inspector in the play 'An Inspector Calls'

    The inspector challenges the audience's attitude. He is a mouthpiece for J.B Preistley and has a strong moral voice, which stands out. He constantly rises above the Birlings. The inspector is so dramatic because of his method of investigation. He talks to each character about the death in tern.

  1. How does Priestley use the Inspector as a dramatic device in "An Inspector Calls", ...

    Just as Mr. Birling begins to finish his speech, a ring of the doorbell interrupts him. When the Inspector calls unexpectedly on the wealthy Birling family his startling revelations shatter the very foundations of their lives. The timing of the entrance of the inspector is quite an important part of the play.

  2. An Inspector Calls. How does J.B Priestley use the Inspector as a dramatic ...

    This was a very touchy subject at the time; women were beginning to get more and more power and made differences to society such as in 1918 when they were first able to vote in a general election. However, with this event taking place after the play was set, this

  1. How does Priestley use time as a dramatic device in 'An Inspector Calls'? How ...

    This accentuates further dramatic irony, considering that the audience from 1947 have the wisdom of hindsight and can see that 1914 and 1939 brought two wars. The audience thus humiliates Mr Birling, as he portrays himself as a "hard-headed business man" but is only proven wrong.

  2. What message do you think that Priestley is trying to give in 'An Inspector ...

    I feel that this particular speech concludes the Inspector's reason for being at the Birlings' house, and the effect that it has on the audience and reader as well as the characters is quite similar. The Inspector's speech shows frequent emotive language to trigger feelings in the audience, which then

  1. An Inspector Calls by J.B Priestley is a play about an inspector who tries ...

    For example, 'yes, I'm afraid it did. It was the last real steady job she had. When she lost it-for no reason that she could discover- she decided that she might as well try another kind of life.' J.B Priestley's use of punctuation enables the inspector to use the 'dash'

  2. Priestley presents ideas about responsibility in an 'An Inspector Calls'

    Priestley?s uses microcosm to reflect the wider problems in a capitalist society. Mrs Birling is also presented to be an irresponsible figure even though she is a parent and ironically the chair person of a charitable committee. However she is not a charitable woman.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work