• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you think that Baz Luhrmann or Franco Zeffirelli is more successful in their presentation of the last act of Romeo and Juliet?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Romeo and Juliet Do you think that Baz Luhrmann or Franco Zeffirelli is more successful in their presentation of the last act of Romeo and Juliet? The last act of "Romeo and Juliet" is the climax of the play. It is where the tragedy occurs making it the part of the play that everyone who reads it remembers. Therefore in order to be successful in their presentations of the last act, Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli, would need to highlight the tragedy of the deaths of Romeo and Juliet and make their audience remember their productions. In deciding which film is better in its portrayal of the last act, I will look at a number of different aspects of each film compared to the play itself to see which is more successful in it's presentation of the last act of "Romeo and Juliet". The Franco Zeffirelli version of "Romeo and Juliet" stays much closer to the original story than the Baz Luhrmann version. However, it does change certain facts and some characters and speeches are left out in the last act. In the play the last act begins with Romeo in Mantua being brought the news of Juliet's death. In the Zeffirelli film an extra scene is added; this being Juliet's funeral. This is really where the last act begins in the film. However, the funeral scene is quite effective. As Juliet is being laid in the crypt Friar Lawrence smiles knowingly at her. ...read more.

Middle

Another change is that in the play Romeo is not discovered to have come back into Verona. In the film he is chased by several helicopters. This adds excitement to the film but perhaps is a bit over the top. There is really no point to it. Another thing changed is that Juliet is in a church instead of the crypt that she is in, in the play. In what is scene three of the play, the film leaves out a number of characters. Firstly Paris is left out presumably for the same reasons as he was left out of the Zeffirelli film. Secondly Tybalt's body is not present in this film. This is probably because this last scene is set in a church and not in a crypt so there would not be any other bodies there. Another possible reason why Tybalt's body was left out is that Baz Luhrmann perhaps did not want to remind the audience that Romeo had killed someone as he did not want the audience to lose any sympathy for Romeo. The final character omitted from the Luhrmann film is Friar Lawrence, which means his long speech explaining everything to the Prince and Romeo and Juliet's parents is also omitted. But the most major thing that Baz Luhrmann changes is the timing of Juliet's wakening. In the play Juliet wakens a few minutes after Romeo has taken the poison. ...read more.

Conclusion

Shakespeare only ever refers to the stars, the heavens and fate. In the Baz Luhrmann film some different camera effects are used in the last scene of the last act. For example when Juliet picks up the gun with which she shoots herself and puts it to her head, the film is in slow motion. This is quite affective in that it builds up the suspense before Juliet kills herself. Also after Romeo and Juliet have died there are flashbacks of their time together and showing how happy they were. These are very effective in that they really highlight the tragedy of their deaths. Taking all of this into account I have come to the conclusion that Baz Luhrmann is more successful in his presentation of the last act of Romeo and Juliet. I think that Baz Luhrmann brings out the tragedy more in his production. The acting is superior and the music more varied. I think the flashbacks at the end are a very good touch, which really appeal to the emotions. I also think that it was very clever that Baz Luhrmann managed to successfully bring Romeo and Juliet into the present day and although Baz Luhrmann makes many changes to the story and even dares to make the major change in the timing of Juliet's wakening I think Shakespeare would not have been against these changes; he may even have been pleased with them as they were clever and he himself made many changes to the original source of Romeo and Juliet, Romeus and Juliet. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were made by ...

    instead he chose something that now a days people like to do when there is a party or holiday. At this point when we see the fireworks Romeo has just taken the ecstasy pill. The ecstasy pill is a social influence that made the movie more modern and made Baz

  2. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    the church bells ring which makes it very ironic because the bells are symbolic of religion which does not promote violence. It is also put across instantly that Tybalt starts the fight and he looks very aggressive. Already just by focusing on the costumes of the characters in the Baz

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    These happy masks that kiss fair laidies' brow, Being black, puts us in mind they hide the fair. He that is strucken blind cannot forget The precious treasure of his eyesight lost. Show me a mistress that is passing fair; What doth her beauty serve but as a note Where I may read who passed the passing fair?

  2. Auteur research study. Auteur? - Baz Luhrmann

    dreams of a multicultural kingdom and all sorts of mother issues will be perfect territory for Luhrmann, a great chance to unleash his personality. Luhrmann works outside mainstream Hollywood and fails to buckle under the pressure supplied by the majority of filmmakers.

  1. How effectively do Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli interpret Act I Scene VI when ...

    Her hair is put up in a simple way and she is not wearing much make-up, this gives the impression of being very pure and not having much to worry about. Her mother, Lady Capulet, is dressed very differently to Juliet.

  2. Compare and contrast the opening scene of the Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann film ...

    Luhrmann has made visual words and images the basis of his film and so the language is overlooked, but Luhrmann uses words visually by placing them in newspapers, billboards, building covers, adverts, TV screens and even number plates. Lines are shouted.

  1. Analyse the techniques used in the trailer for Baz Lurhmann's film "Romeo and Juliet". ...

    These two different images also help to show us that the families hate each other and try to be as different from each other as possible. Lighting is another very important aspect in this trailer. The way different characters are lit shows us what they are like or what situation they are in.

  2. Discuss this statement in relation to the prologue and Act 1 Scene 5 analysing ...

    "In fair Verona" "A pair of star cross'd lovers" and "take their life" are the lines from the prologue, which are exaggerated the most using visual and sound effects. For example the lines would be written across the screen. I think Luhrmann chose to emphasise the prologue as much as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work